And it was comey that tanked irNo that was up to the DOJ to take the case. Comey bombed Hillary when he made a public speach about it two weeks before the election and fueled trumps lock her up movement
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And it was comey that tanked irNo that was up to the DOJ to take the case. Comey bombed Hillary when he made a public speach about it two weeks before the election and fueled trumps lock her up movement
Yes Comey tanked her campaign. What are you missing here? The DOJ didn’t take the case. Trumps FBI and DOJ didn’t take the case either. They could have. You’re a victim of being gullible and buying into campaign propaganda. Wake upAnd it was comey that tanked ir
Comey tanked the case against her, but letting her off the hook....granted he was likely order by Obama to do that.Yes Comey tanked her campaign. What are you missing here? The DOJ didn’t take the case. Trumps FBI and DOJ didn’t take the case either. They could have. You’re a victim of being gullible and buying into campaign propaganda. Wake up
Trump ran on blocking her up. Thousands of people chanting it while he cheered them on and literally said he would do it. So why not open the case and seek out justice while fulfilling a campaign promise??Comey tanked the case against her, but letting her off the hook....granted he was likely order by Obama to do that.
The FBI is part of the DOJ you idiot. Yes, they weren't going to prosecute her, Obama made that clear while the investigation was active.
Trump wasn't going to reopen the case after it was closed. It was done, he wanted to move on, and wanted the country to move on.
nah, he ran on making America great again....some folks liked to say that during the campaign. It was sort of funny, a majority of Americans knew she was corrupt and the Obama admin was fast and loose with the truth prior to it being exposed.Trump ran on blocking her up. Thousands of people chanting it while he cheered them on and literally said he would do it. So why not open the case and seek out justice while fulfilling a campaign promise??
Because it was all hot air. You fell for it
No evidence was withheld. A political appointee dropped the case because that’s what Trump wanted. The career prosecutors disagreed and refused to go along with it. His guilt was never in doubt.He withdrew his plea before the court accepted it, the DOJ then dismissed the case
Mueller’s team had withheld evidence
The FEC found nothing wrong.He was paying Cohen to pay Daniels. The money Daniels received was Trump’s money, laundered thru Cohen to hide the source.
Even if you deny this fact (which was proven at trial), Trump would still have had to note the attorney fees on his campaign disclosures which he didn’t.
The FEC found nothing wrong..Exactly. Cohen was reimbursed for the NDA. They hid this fact by creating false invoices, which is where the fraudulent business records comes in.
The fact that Trump reimbursed Cohen’s expenses later is indicative of his attempt to hide these payments.
Furthermore, since all of this was a campaign expense, it is legally required to be reported as such, which they didn’t.
Incorrect, all the evidence wasn’t turned over until after he withdrew his plea and got to new counselNo evidence was withheld. A political appointee dropped the case because that’s what Trump wanted. The career prosecutors disagreed and refused to go along with it. His guilt was never in doubt.
As opposed to Clinton, where no political appointees were involved and every individual in the DoJ team was unanimous about the decision not to prosecute.
The FEC found nothing wrong.True! But they have to document that work appropriately.
Trump didn’t.
He created false business records to hide the fact that he paid for the NDA.
He hid the payments from the FEC as required by law.
That is why he’s convicted of felonies.
Lies.You're lying. Trump's criminal underlings went to jail because they lied about their associations with Russians in an effort to steal the 2016 election.
Describe this “evidence”.Incorrect, all the evidence wasn’t turned over until after he withdrew his plea and got to new counsel
Once all was released it was obvious he wasn’t guilty and the charges dismissed
Link.The FEC found nothing wrong..
Sure it showed he didn’t violate the lawDescribe this “evidence”.
I didn't ask what it showed. I asked you to describe it. What are the relevant facts that show he didn't violate the law.Sure it showed he didn’t violate the law
By telling you what it showed I’m providing more detail then simply describing itI didn't ask what it showed. I asked you to describe it. What are the relevant facts that show he didn't violate the law.
No, you're providing a conclusion and demanding I accept it.By telling you what it showed I’m providing more detail then simply describing it
That's not the same as "finding nothing wrong". It just means they didn't pursue charges.Here is your link to no charges or fines....