Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the board was every together in one room it would be very interesting if some of the BA typers would in fact be so brave. I seriously doubt it.
I will admit that Wirebender is very intelligent and has tied co2 to the laws of thermodynamics that are solid. HEAT CAN"T flow from colder to HOTTER and energy can't be made out of nothing. More discussion needs to be had on how it gets around it. The warmer side needs to post journal papers that are peer reviewed as wirebender wishes to be proven wrong. Show how it gets around the LAW of Physics as it should be easy as over 97 percent of scientist appear to be supportive of the theory of global warming...You'll think that there would be solid Physics all over the fucking internet to be posted showing to a T how it works, BUT IN all honesty there is still something causing the warming and it is only human to went to find out what it is. What is "z"? Surely not the sun.
We as humans are trying to figure out how things work...That is good!
There is still that nasty variable that is causing the warming. I will keep track of it too. But we shouldn't be having this back and forth discussion if the science of global warming was so solid. Hell the warmers should be beating the dead horse every time this question come up(A FUCKING TURKEY SHOOT. That's how many papers, peer review papers and blog post that should be out there discussing this topic to post at the skeptics.
Look, I know it's warming and the ice is melting, but we really shouldn't have to defend our case on the defensive every time some one like wirebender comes onto this forum. We must be damn fucking sure we have the science down in a easy to understand way that people can understand! If wirebender is wrong then his science should easily be shown to be WRONG! Hell we warmers should have stuff ready that can utterly destroy people like wirebenders case to the point that even someone that knows very little will agree with us. The basics should honestly be down pat!
WHAT THE FUCK HAVE WE BEEN DOING?
I will admit that Wirebender is very intelligent and has tied co2 to the laws of thermodynamics that are solid. HEAT CAN"T flow from colder to HOTTER and energy can't be made out of nothing. More discussion needs to be had on how it gets around it. The warmer side needs to post journal papers that are peer reviewed as wirebender wishes to be proven wrong. Show how it gets around the LAW of Physics as it should be easy as over 97 percent of scientist appear to be supportive of the theory of global warming...You'll think that there would be solid Physics all over the fucking internet to be posted showing to a T how it works, BUT IN all honesty there is still something causing the warming and it is only human to went to find out what it is. What is "z"? Surely not the sun.
We as humans are trying to figure out how things work...That is good!
There is still that nasty variable that is causing the warming. I will keep track of it too. But we shouldn't be having this back and forth discussion if the science of global warming was so solid. Hell the warmers should be beating the dead horse every time this question come up(A FUCKING TURKEY SHOOT. That's how many papers, peer review papers and blog post that should be out there discussing this topic to post at the skeptics.
Look, I know it's warming and the ice is melting, but we really shouldn't have to defend our case on the defensive every time some one like wirebender comes onto this forum. We must be damn fucking sure we have the science down in a easy to understand way that people can understand! If wirebender is wrong then his science should easily be shown to be WRONG! Hell we warmers should have stuff ready that can utterly destroy people like wirebenders case to the point that even someone that knows very little will agree with us. The basics should honestly be down pat!
WHAT THE FUCK HAVE WE BEEN DOING?
Wirebender has had the fallacies of his twisted understandings exposed and patiently explained to him many times along with long involved personal explanations and discussions explaining the science and precisely where his distortions deviate from reality. Unfortunately, within a matter of weeks (occassionally days) he begins repeating the same previous mistakes as though the earlier discussions had never occurred.
do wirebender's magical EM fields really make it impossible for a CO2 molecule to emit a photon earthward or are we just measuring the preponderance of radiation going in a certain direction?
when the ice melts in a glass of ice water does the water level rise ??
Green represents ice that was present on 09/14/2011 that was not present on 09/14/2007.
Red represents ice that was present on 09/14/2007 that was not present on 09/14/2011.
Bremen however, claims that the ice in 2007 and the ice today are essentially identical. Me thinks shenanigans most foul are afoot.
Nope, but no one said sea ice would rise the sea level. On the other hand melting land ice from ice sheets or glaciers surely will. Greenland, Antarctica. This topic isn't about sea levels either... Well one way you could rise the sea level is more open ocean=more energy being absorbed=expanding oceans. Water expands when you heat it. Part of the rise in sea levels are because of the increasing temperature of the oceans.