Reasons To Vote For Trump

[gusto]

I can think of a few reasons to vote for Trump. They don't, however, override the nearly 200 reasons I can think of for not voting for him.

The few reasons I gave to vote for Trump overrides 10,000 reasons you can think of to not vote for him.

 

[320 Years of History]

I can think of a few reasons to vote for Trump. They don't, however, override the nearly 200 reasons I can think of for not voting for him.

The few reasons I gave to vote for Trump overrides 10,000 reasons you can think of to not vote for him.

When I grant you the right to cast my vote, maybe they will, but right now you don't have that imprimatur.

 

[owebo]

I can think of a few reasons to vote for Trump. They don't, however, override the nearly 200 reasons I can think of for not voting for him.

The few reasons I gave to vote for Trump overrides 10,000 reasons you can think of to not vote for him.

When I grant you the right to cast my vote, maybe they will, but right now you don't have that imprimatur.

No one gives a fuck about your vote....

We give a fuck knowing there are fascists like you living amongst us Americans.....

 

[The VOR]

Reasons To Vote For Trump

There are only 2 posssible reasons to vote for trump:

1. You are an absolute moron
2. You are a partisan hack who will vote the straight ticket for your party regardless of who is on the ballot

 

[longknife]

Reasons To Vote For Trump

There are only 2 posssible reasons to vote for trump:

1. You are an absolute moron
2. You are a partisan hack who will vote the straight ticket for your party regardless of who is on the ballot

Tsk. Tsk. You really had to dig deep for that, didn't you?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

1. Bill and Hillary (Billary) already had their chance. It's time for some new blood.
2. When Ross Perot was running against Bill Clinton, What Ross predicted would happen if Bill was elected did happen. Basically, a huge sucking sound was heard as jobs left the U.S. Not only leaving many Americans with nothing better to do than flip each other's burgers, but giving China MUCH MORE economic, political and military clout.
3. Hillary was ultimately responsible for a U.S. ambassador being murdered in Libya.
4. Hillary will probably continue to support the muslim extremist rebels in Syria. Probably even get us more deeply involved. ON THE WRONG SIDE!!!
5. As I said in another thread, Hillary will likely let even more enemy muslim refugees (invaders) into this country.
6. Trump is already a multi-billionaire. That would make him much harder to bribe. Hillary on the other hand has already shown herself ready, willing and able to support any special interest as long as they have the cash. Etc. etc. etc.

If you are thinking for Hillary, it's not too late to do the right thing and vote for TRUMP!!!

Basically, a huge sucking sound was heard as jobs left the U.S. Not only leaving many Americans with nothing better to do than flip each other's burgers, but giving China MUCH MORE economic, political and military clout.

China wasn't part of NAFTA.

If not, maybe it was GATT. Whatever it was a part of, our jobs sure were sucked over there fast enough.

If not, maybe it was GATT.

Ross Perot whined about NAFTA in 1992, he never whined about GATT.

In looking it up, apparently China was just able to crash the NAFTA party. As to what Ross Perot did or didn't specifically "whine" about, I don't know. But he didn't like the idea of jobs being sucked out of the U.S. by cheap foreign labor. And for good reason.

apparently China was just able to crash the NAFTA party.

Love to hear your theory. Spell it out.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Reasons I voted for Trump:

1. He's not Hillary.
2. Hillary is a criminal.
3. Hillary is a compulsive liar.
4. Hillary is a power hungry psychopath.
5. He isn't Hillary.

amazing how this troll can see the facts about how evil Hillery is but he ignores them when people post evidence that 9/11 was an inside job or that that oswald was innocent.

9-11 was an inside job. Inside Saudi Arabia. Not the U.S. And Oswald was guilty.

great comedy relief from you troll,you should get married to predfan.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I can think of a few reasons to vote for Trump. They don't, however, override the nearly 200 reasons I can think of for not voting for him.

The few reasons I gave to vote for Trump overrides 10,000 reasons you can think of to not vote for him.

When I grant you the right to cast my vote, maybe they will, but right now you don't have that imprimatur.

No one gives a fuck about your vote....

We give a fuck knowing there are fascists like you living amongst us Americans.....

facists like gusto and uncensored yes.

 

[there4eyeM]

A good reason to vote for either of the two-party dictatorship's candidates is that one does not like America.

 

[gusto]

I can think of a few reasons to vote for Trump. They don't, however, override the nearly 200 reasons I can think of for not voting for him.

The few reasons I gave to vote for Trump overrides 10,000 reasons you can think of to not vote for him.

When I grant you the right to cast my vote, maybe they will, but right now you don't have that imprimatur.

You have my permission to vote for Trump.

 

[gusto]

Reasons To Vote For Trump

There are only 2 posssible reasons to vote for trump:

1. You are an absolute moron
2. You are a partisan hack who will vote the straight ticket for your party regardless of who is on the ballot

How about instead if giving me your insipid reasons for not voting for Trump, you refute some of the reasons I gave to vote for him in my thread. Better yet, try to refute something in my thread "A vote for Hillary is a vote against women" or my thread "Voting for Hillary is voting for rape."

 

[gusto]

1. Bill and Hillary (Billary) already had their chance. It's time for some new blood.
2. When Ross Perot was running against Bill Clinton, What Ross predicted would happen if Bill was elected did happen. Basically, a huge sucking sound was heard as jobs left the U.S. Not only leaving many Americans with nothing better to do than flip each other's burgers, but giving China MUCH MORE economic, political and military clout.
3. Hillary was ultimately responsible for a U.S. ambassador being murdered in Libya.
4. Hillary will probably continue to support the muslim extremist rebels in Syria. Probably even get us more deeply involved. ON THE WRONG SIDE!!!
5. As I said in another thread, Hillary will likely let even more enemy muslim refugees (invaders) into this country.
6. Trump is already a multi-billionaire. That would make him much harder to bribe. Hillary on the other hand has already shown herself ready, willing and able to support any special interest as long as they have the cash. Etc. etc. etc.

If you are thinking for Hillary, it's not too late to do the right thing and vote for TRUMP!!!

Basically, a huge sucking sound was heard as jobs left the U.S. Not only leaving many Americans with nothing better to do than flip each other's burgers, but giving China MUCH MORE economic, political and military clout.

China wasn't part of NAFTA.

If not, maybe it was GATT. Whatever it was a part of, our jobs sure were sucked over there fast enough.

If not, maybe it was GATT.

Ross Perot whined about NAFTA in 1992, he never whined about GATT.

In looking it up, apparently China was just able to crash the NAFTA party. As to what Ross Perot did or didn't specifically "whine" about, I don't know. But he didn't like the idea of jobs being sucked out of the U.S. by cheap foreign labor. And for good reason.

apparently China was just able to crash the NAFTA party.

Love to hear your theory. Spell it out.

"Theory" my ass. And I don't need to spell it out. If you don't believe me, look it up yourself. Just enter into your browser something like, "Was China included in the NAFTA agreement." One of the websites that should come up is one that talks about China crashing the NAFTA party. Or if that doesn't satisfy you, the next time you are in some store, look to see how many of the products are made in China.

 

[gusto]

I can think of a few reasons to vote for Trump. They don't, however, override the nearly 200 reasons I can think of for not voting for him.

The few reasons I gave to vote for Trump overrides 10,000 reasons you can think of to not vote for him.

When I grant you the right to cast my vote, maybe they will, but right now you don't have that imprimatur.

No one gives a fuck about your vote....

We give a fuck knowing there are fascists like you living amongst us Americans.....

facists like gusto and uncensored yes.

Interesting that you should bring up fascism. Go to the search box near the top of the page and enter into it "Why vote National Socialist. (nazi party)" Then press the search button. When you find it, read it. Leave a reply and let me know that you did. I will be glad to go to that thread and debate you over whatever you said in your reply.

 

[gusto]

A good reason to vote for either of the two-party dictatorship's candidates is that one does not like America.

The U.S. isn't a dictatorship. It is a plutocracy. Also, if you are saying that Hillary doesn't like America, I agree. It is sure evident that she doesn't like the idea of us making our own products.

 

[jwoodie]

I can think of a few reasons to vote for Trump. They don't, however, override the nearly 200 reasons I can think of for not voting for him.

The few reasons I gave to vote for Trump overrides 10,000 reasons you can think of to not vote for him.

When I grant you the right to cast my vote, maybe they will, but right now you don't have that imprimatur.

It appears that you are confusing imprimatur with non sequitur.

 

[jwoodie]

I can think of a few reasons to vote for Trump. They don't, however, override the nearly 200 reasons I can think of for not voting for him.

The few reasons I gave to vote for Trump overrides 10,000 reasons you can think of to not vote for him.

When I grant you the right to cast my vote, maybe they will, but right now you don't have that imprimatur.

It appears that you have confused imprimatur with your own non sequitur. Besides, "too many reasons to list them" is intellectually vapid response..

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Basically, a huge sucking sound was heard as jobs left the U.S. Not only leaving many Americans with nothing better to do than flip each other's burgers, but giving China MUCH MORE economic, political and military clout.

China wasn't part of NAFTA.

If not, maybe it was GATT. Whatever it was a part of, our jobs sure were sucked over there fast enough.

If not, maybe it was GATT.

Ross Perot whined about NAFTA in 1992, he never whined about GATT.

In looking it up, apparently China was just able to crash the NAFTA party. As to what Ross Perot did or didn't specifically "whine" about, I don't know. But he didn't like the idea of jobs being sucked out of the U.S. by cheap foreign labor. And for good reason.

apparently China was just able to crash the NAFTA party.

Love to hear your theory. Spell it out.

"Theory" my ass. And I don't need to spell it out. If you don't believe me, look it up yourself. Just enter into your browser something like, "Was China included in the NAFTA agreement." One of the websites that should come up is one that talks about China crashing the NAFTA party. Or if that doesn't satisfy you, the next time you are in some store, look to see how many of the products are made in China.

"Theory" my ass.

China crashing NAFTA isn't a theory? What is it?

And I don't need to spell it out.

I agree. You can make stupid claims and don't need to back them up.

Just enter into your browser something like, "Was China included in the NAFTA agreement."

It would say, of course not, NAFTA involves the US, Canada and Mexico, not China.

the next time you are in some store, look to see how many of the products are made in China.

Good idea. Still doesn't involve NAFTA.

 

[gusto]

If not, maybe it was GATT. Whatever it was a part of, our jobs sure were sucked over there fast enough.

If not, maybe it was GATT.

Ross Perot whined about NAFTA in 1992, he never whined about GATT.

In looking it up, apparently China was just able to crash the NAFTA party. As to what Ross Perot did or didn't specifically "whine" about, I don't know. But he didn't like the idea of jobs being sucked out of the U.S. by cheap foreign labor. And for good reason.

apparently China was just able to crash the NAFTA party.

Love to hear your theory. Spell it out.

"Theory" my ass. And I don't need to spell it out. If you don't believe me, look it up yourself. Just enter into your browser something like, "Was China included in the NAFTA agreement." One of the websites that should come up is one that talks about China crashing the NAFTA party. Or if that doesn't satisfy you, the next time you are in some store, look to see how many of the products are made in China.

"Theory" my ass.

China crashing NAFTA isn't a theory? What is it?

And I don't need to spell it out.

I agree. You can make stupid claims and don't need to back them up.

Just enter into your browser something like, "Was China included in the NAFTA agreement."

It would say, of course not, NAFTA involves the US, Canada and Mexico, not China.

the next time you are in some store, look to see how many of the products are made in China.

Good idea. Still doesn't involve NAFTA.

Go to any store and see how many products are made in China. Is the product saying so only a "theory?" Next, you have to be an idiot if you think I am going to "back that up."

Next, don't tell me about what it would say. Type into your browser what I told you to for your "back up." One of the websites should talk about how China crashed the NAFTA party. Whether or not they were invited doesn't matter.

Next, NAFTA got the ball rolling with "free trade." China got in on the action. NAFTA is the reason why. So it does involve NAFTA.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If not, maybe it was GATT.

Ross Perot whined about NAFTA in 1992, he never whined about GATT.

In looking it up, apparently China was just able to crash the NAFTA party. As to what Ross Perot did or didn't specifically "whine" about, I don't know. But he didn't like the idea of jobs being sucked out of the U.S. by cheap foreign labor. And for good reason.

apparently China was just able to crash the NAFTA party.

Love to hear your theory. Spell it out.

"Theory" my ass. And I don't need to spell it out. If you don't believe me, look it up yourself. Just enter into your browser something like, "Was China included in the NAFTA agreement." One of the websites that should come up is one that talks about China crashing the NAFTA party. Or if that doesn't satisfy you, the next time you are in some store, look to see how many of the products are made in China.

"Theory" my ass.

China crashing NAFTA isn't a theory? What is it?

And I don't need to spell it out.

I agree. You can make stupid claims and don't need to back them up.

Just enter into your browser something like, "Was China included in the NAFTA agreement."

It would say, of course not, NAFTA involves the US, Canada and Mexico, not China.

the next time you are in some store, look to see how many of the products are made in China.

Good idea. Still doesn't involve NAFTA.

Go to any store and see how many products are made in China. Is the product saying so only a "theory?" Next, you have to be an idiot if you think I am going to "back that up."

Next, don't tell me about what it would say. Type into your browser what I told you to for your "back up." One of the websites should talk about how China crashed the NAFTA party. Whether or not they were invited doesn't matter.

Next, NAFTA got the ball rolling with "free trade." China got in on the action. NAFTA is the reason why. So it does involve NAFTA.

Go to any store and see how many products are made in China. Is the product saying so only a "theory?"

No, the product is saying, imported from a non-NAFTA country.

Next, you have to be an idiot if you think I am going to "back that up."

I agree, you can't back up your idiocy.

Next, NAFTA got the ball rolling with "free trade." China got in on the action.

We still don't have a free trade agreement with China, over 20 years after NAFTA...which didn't include China.

 

[there4eyeM]

A good reason to vote for either of the two-party dictatorship's candidates is that one does not like America.

The U.S. isn't a dictatorship. It is a plutocracy. Also, if you are saying that Hillary doesn't like America, I agree. It is sure evident that she doesn't like the idea of us making our own products.

Perhaps, as often happens, my post has been misunderstood. The "one" in the post is meant as 'you', 'a person', not one of the (so-called) candidates.