Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ABC gets busted for killing stories that are damaging to the Clintons and begin targeting the person responsible with investigations. Their fellow anti-Trump liberal MSM propaganda pusher fires the ABC Whistle Blower....'ABC has ' No comment'.
Correct, I just said that.
I also said you've schiffted the topic because your original one has been exposed as a fraud. And you not only have no answer for that, you cut it out of the quote entirely hoping it would just go away.
Cute. But ineffective.
ABC gets busted for killing stories that are damaging to the Clintons and begin targeting the person responsible with investigations. Their fellow anti-Trump liberal MSM propaganda pusher fires the ABC Whistle Blower....'ABC has ' No comment'.
Correct, I just said that.
I also said you've schiffted the topic because your original one has been exposed as a fraud. And you not only have no answer for that, you cut it out of the quote entirely hoping it would just go away.
Cute. But ineffective.
'Nothing to see here's says snowflakes...
I love it when snowflakes try to act stupid...
I have provided a link to the article...you have provided rambling opinion....ABC gets busted for killing stories that are damaging to the Clintons and begin targeting the person responsible with investigations. Their fellow anti-Trump liberal MSM propaganda pusher fires the ABC Whistle Blower....'ABC has ' No comment'.
Correct, I just said that.
I also said you've schiffted the topic because your original one has been exposed as a fraud. And you not only have no answer for that, you cut it out of the quote entirely hoping it would just go away.
Cute. But ineffective.
'Nothing to see here's says snowflakes...
I love it when snowflakes try to act stupid...
Once AGAIN you have no source for that.
Prove you do.
I have provided a link to the article...you have provided rambling opinion....ABC gets busted for killing stories that are damaging to the Clintons and begin targeting the person responsible with investigations. Their fellow anti-Trump liberal MSM propaganda pusher fires the ABC Whistle Blower....'ABC has ' No comment'.
Correct, I just said that.
I also said you've schiffted the topic because your original one has been exposed as a fraud. And you not only have no answer for that, you cut it out of the quote entirely hoping it would just go away.
Cute. But ineffective.
'Nothing to see here's says snowflakes...
I love it when snowflakes try to act stupid...
Once AGAIN you have no source for that.
Prove you do.
You gave me your uaeles, biased, parroted, unsubstantiated snowflake opinion.You sure did, and I showed you where all the holes are..
I gave you a steaming heaping dollop of REALITY, Hunior. The fact is your hopelessly biased source, which already ADMITS its bias, cites no source whatsoever beyond some Twit called "Yashar Ali" who has NO credentials, NO employer, NO byline, NO editor, and NO credibility, and I should add, NO named sources. So we have NO credible evidence whatsoever that CBS fired anybody for anything. PERIOD.
That ain't "opinion" ---- it's an accounting of what's in the article and WHAT ISN'T.
Go ahead and show me some. Prove me wrong. Bring it.
...personal, partisan, anti-Trump, biased, UNSUBSTANTIATED OPINION in response to an article / link.
'You Lose'?!
That might be your funniest OPINION yet, lil' snowflake...
Bwuhahahaha...
I'm sorry, I don't acknowledge snowflakes who ignore documented substantiated facts and articles by spewing biased personal UNSUBSTANTIATED OPINION AS IF IT WAS VALID. It immediately disqualifies you from intelligent fact-based discussion.Well LOSER, I invited you like eight times to prove me wrong. YOU CAN'T DO IT.
I'm sorry, I don't acknowledge snowflakes who ignore documented substantiated facts and articles by spewing biased personal UNSUBSTANTIATED OPINION AS IF IT WAS VALID. It immediately disqualifies you from intelligent fact-based discussion.Well LOSER, I invited you like eight times to prove me wrong. YOU CAN'T DO IT.
Thanks for playing, though, lil' snowflake. Have a nice night.
ABC are real journalists and they like evidence and proof for their stories. It's not like your propaganda machine who will say anything and never retract.
so if something "reeks" of what you hate or the like, then it's exactly that?I'm sorry, I don't acknowledge snowflakes who ignore documented substantiated facts and articles by spewing biased personal UNSUBSTANTIATED OPINION AS IF IT WAS VALID. It immediately disqualifies you from intelligent fact-based discussion.Well LOSER, I invited you like eight times to prove me wrong. YOU CAN'T DO IT.
Thanks for playing, though, lil' snowflake. Have a nice night.
So you want more? I hear and obey. Dig this, directly from your link:
>> As James O'Keefe said, "You have all these anon sources inside ABC News, @yashar, and your priority is not to find out who spiked the #EpsteinCoverup story but to use your anon sources to go after who brought it to light. <<
That's the "relative of" a James O'Keefe employee (the article author), citing O'Keefe giving orders to this "Yashar Ali".
I think we figured out who Yashar Ali's employer is, don't you?
You're welcome. Next time VET YOUR SHIT. This is exactly why I expressed skepticism from the beginning ---- it reeks of O'Keefe and his fraud shenanigans. QED.
I'm sorry, I don't acknowledge snowflakes who ignore documented substantiated facts and articles by spewing biased personal UNSUBSTANTIATED OPINION AS IF IT WAS VALID. It immediately disqualifies you from intelligent fact-based discussion.Well LOSER, I invited you like eight times to prove me wrong. YOU CAN'T DO IT.
Thanks for playing, though, lil' snowflake. Have a nice night.
So you want more? I hear and obey. Dig this, directly from your link:
>> As James O'Keefe said, "You have all these anon sources inside ABC News, @yashar, and your priority is not to find out who spiked the #EpsteinCoverup story but to use your anon sources to go after who brought it to light. <<
That's the "relative of" a James O'Keefe employee (the article author), citing O'Keefe giving orders to this "Yashar Ali".
I think we figured out who Yashar Ali's employer is, don't you?
You're welcome. Next time VET YOUR SHIT. This is exactly why I expressed skepticism from the beginning ---- it reeks of O'Keefe and his fraud shenanigans. QED.