Real Science…Not Darwin

[Grumblenuts]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

 

[alang1216]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

Maybe Noah could explain.

 

[alang1216]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

 

[esalla]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

 

[Blues Man]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

And, on you three.....the indoctrination worked.

As long as there are weak-minded, easily led folks, Militant Secularism will succeed.

I have never once called Evolution a fact. If you think I have then please find that quote and post it.

When you can't find that quote, will you have the integrity to admit you just lied about my stance?

I bet not.

In the meanwhile you have not provided any proof that any text books used in US public schools state that evolution is a proven scientific fact.

Didn't you ask me to find Darwinist propaganda in textbooks?

I sure put a cork in your pie hole, huh?

You need to learn to read

I asked you for evidence that the public school text books call the Theory of evolution a scientifically proven fact.

That is after all what you are whining about isn't it??????????????????????????????????

 

[alang1216]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

Dinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?

 

[esalla]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

Dinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?

Wrong question. You should be asking where did the code that evolves come from as code does not spontaneously generate

 

[PoliticalChic]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

And, on you three.....the indoctrination worked.

As long as there are weak-minded, easily led folks, Militant Secularism will succeed.

I have never once called Evolution a fact. If you think I have then please find that quote and post it.

When you can't find that quote, will you have the integrity to admit you just lied about my stance?

I bet not.

In the meanwhile you have not provided any proof that any text books used in US public schools state that evolution is a proven scientific fact.

Didn't you ask me to find Darwinist propaganda in textbooks?

I sure put a cork in your pie hole, huh?

You need to learn to read

I asked you for evidence that the public school text books call the Theory of evolution a scientifically proven fact.

That is after all what you are whining about isn't it??????????????????????????????????

You need to learn to read: I gave you two examples the texts used to 'prove' Darwin.

Both are lies.

 

[esalla]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

And, on you three.....the indoctrination worked.

As long as there are weak-minded, easily led folks, Militant Secularism will succeed.

I have never once called Evolution a fact. If you think I have then please find that quote and post it.

When you can't find that quote, will you have the integrity to admit you just lied about my stance?

I bet not.

In the meanwhile you have not provided any proof that any text books used in US public schools state that evolution is a proven scientific fact.

Didn't you ask me to find Darwinist propaganda in textbooks?

I sure put a cork in your pie hole, huh?

You need to learn to read

I asked you for evidence that the public school text books call the Theory of evolution a scientifically proven fact.

That is after all what you are whining about isn't it??????????????????????????????????

You need to learn to read: I gave you two examples the texts used to 'prove' Darwin.

Both are lies.

Kid if you do this every day for 16 hours a day for the next 50 years you will not prove or disprove anything

Just sayin

 

[Blues Man]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

Dinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?

Wrong question. You should be asking where did the code that evolves come from as code does not spontaneously generate

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

And, on you three.....the indoctrination worked.

As long as there are weak-minded, easily led folks, Militant Secularism will succeed.

I have never once called Evolution a fact. If you think I have then please find that quote and post it.

When you can't find that quote, will you have the integrity to admit you just lied about my stance?

I bet not.

In the meanwhile you have not provided any proof that any text books used in US public schools state that evolution is a proven scientific fact.

Didn't you ask me to find Darwinist propaganda in textbooks?

I sure put a cork in your pie hole, huh?

You need to learn to read

I asked you for evidence that the public school text books call the Theory of evolution a scientifically proven fact.

That is after all what you are whining about isn't it??????????????????????????????????

You need to learn to read: I gave you two examples the texts used to 'prove' Darwin.

Both are lies.

And in neither example were the words "scientifically proven fact" present. And the second one was some 19th century crap that you have not proven is still being taught in public schools today.

The fact is we do see both animal and plant species change over time due to many external factors. You agreed that speciation can happen in plants and I posted a link to what biologists believe to be the onset of speciation in a bird population.

So are you denying these things too?

So please post something from a widely used public school text that definitively states Darwin's Theory of evolution is a scientifically proven fact. That is you argument is it not?

Maybe you don't realize that saying we can see changes in animal species over time is not the same as saying Darwin's theory has been scientifically proven to be fact



The Big Bang is also a theory taught in schools and while it is widely accepted it still is not fact.

 

[alang1216]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

Dinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?

Wrong question. You should be asking where did the code that evolves come from as code does not spontaneously generate

Wrong analogy. Molecules spontaneously assemble and break apart. If there were some fundamental law, like maybe only the fittest survive, you may yourself some evolution.

 

[esalla]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

Dinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?

Wrong question. You should be asking where did the code that evolves come from as code does not spontaneously generate

Wrong analogy. Molecules spontaneously assemble and break apart. If there were some fundamental law, like maybe only the fittest survive, you may yourself some evolution.

Molecules do not have dna, also molecules do not do anything spontaneously they break or join as their charges and weights determine

 

[Hollie]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

And, on you three.....the indoctrination worked.

As long as there are weak-minded, easily led folks, Militant Secularism will succeed.

I have never once called Evolution a fact. If you think I have then please find that quote and post it.

When you can't find that quote, will you have the integrity to admit you just lied about my stance?

I bet not.

In the meanwhile you have not provided any proof that any text books used in US public schools state that evolution is a proven scientific fact.

Didn't you ask me to find Darwinist propaganda in textbooks?

I sure put a cork in your pie hole, huh?

You need to learn to read

I asked you for evidence that the public school text books call the Theory of evolution a scientifically proven fact.

That is after all what you are whining about isn't it??????????????????????????????????

You need to learn to read: I gave you two examples the texts used to 'prove' Darwin.

Both are lies.

Such silly melodrama.

The problem you have with the science of biological evolution is that your only exposure has been through your fundamentalist ministries. Fundamentalist hacks have an agenda to press which is why they react as they do to knowledge and learning. That is why your cutting and pasting consists of ''quotes'' from fundie ministries. I honestly don't know why you would cut and paste the nonsense you dump into these threads and expect to be taken seriously.

Regarding your ignorant and uninformed claims about Darwin and Origin of Species actually theorized, neither the pattern of the fossil record or the existence of intermediate fossil forms was considered controversial amongst the scientists of the time. Darwin came up with an alternative explanation for these facts that did not rely on the supernatural. So the question is not what do intermediate forms in the fossil record (or the pattern of the fossil record) "prove", but rather how do we explain the existence of intermediate forms in the fossil record (and the pattern of fossil record)?

Biological evolution is the current best scientific explanation for this evidence; as well as that from many other biological fields. What modern anti-evolutionists tend to do is to simply deny that the evidence even exists rather than attempt to scientifically explain it. But then they are usually doing apologetics for their sectarian beliefs, not science.

Origin of Species put forth the theory of adaptation by species to an environment. And yes, that is documented fact.

 

[alang1216]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

Dinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?

Wrong question. You should be asking where did the code that evolves come from as code does not spontaneously generate

Wrong analogy. Molecules spontaneously assemble and break apart. If there were some fundamental law, like maybe only the fittest survive, you may yourself some evolution.

Molecules do not have dna, also molecules do not do anything spontaneously they break or join as their charges and weights determine

Molecules do not have dna, so? A molecule does not do anything spontaneously they break or join as their charges and weights determine. Many molecules however behave more randomly. If you heat up water, not all the molecules will turn from liquid to vapor at the same time.

 

[esalla]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

Dinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?

Wrong question. You should be asking where did the code that evolves come from as code does not spontaneously generate

Wrong analogy. Molecules spontaneously assemble and break apart. If there were some fundamental law, like maybe only the fittest survive, you may yourself some evolution.

Molecules do not have dna, also molecules do not do anything spontaneously they break or join as their charges and weights determine

Molecules do not have dna, so? A molecule does not do anything spontaneously they break or join as their charges and weights determine. Many molecules however behave more randomly. If you heat up water, not all the molecules will turn from liquid to vapor at the same time.

State changes do not involve code

 

[Grumblenuts]

RNA has "code." When non-repetitive basic nucleotide molecules (adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil) combine, do they have a choice about being "Code" or "Not Code"?

Which parts of the processes described here require supernatural planning or intervention? For example, was the following part of the original plan or is the creator still working on it through us?

In 2014 the same team from the Scripps Research Institute reported that they synthesized a stretch of circular DNA known as a plasmid containing natural T-A and C-G base pairs along with the best-performing UBP Romesberg's laboratory had designed and inserted it into cells of the common bacterium E. coli that successfully replicated the unnatural base pairs through multiple generations.[9] The transfection did not hamper the growth of the E. coli cells and showed no sign of losing its unnatural base pairs to its natural DNA repair mechanisms. This is the first known example of a living organism passing along an expanded genetic code to subsequent generations.[20][21] Romesberg said he and his colleagues created 300 variants to refine the design of nucleotides that would be stable enough and would be replicated as easily as the natural ones when the cells divide.

 

[esalla]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

Dinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?

Wrong question. You should be asking where did the code that evolves come from as code does not spontaneously generate

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

And, on you three.....the indoctrination worked.

As long as there are weak-minded, easily led folks, Militant Secularism will succeed.

I have never once called Evolution a fact. If you think I have then please find that quote and post it.

When you can't find that quote, will you have the integrity to admit you just lied about my stance?

I bet not.

In the meanwhile you have not provided any proof that any text books used in US public schools state that evolution is a proven scientific fact.

Didn't you ask me to find Darwinist propaganda in textbooks?

I sure put a cork in your pie hole, huh?

You need to learn to read

I asked you for evidence that the public school text books call the Theory of evolution a scientifically proven fact.

That is after all what you are whining about isn't it??????????????????????????????????

You need to learn to read: I gave you two examples the texts used to 'prove' Darwin.

Both are lies.

And in neither example were the words "scientifically proven fact" present. And the second one was some 19th century crap that you have not proven is still being taught in public schools today.

The fact is we do see both animal and plant species change over time due to many external factors. You agreed that speciation can happen in plants and I posted a link to what biologists believe to be the onset of speciation in a bird population.

So are you denying these things too?

So please post something from a widely used public school text that definitively states Darwin's Theory of evolution is a scientifically proven fact. That is you argument is it not?

Maybe you don't realize that saying we can see changes in animal species over time is not the same as saying Darwin's theory has been scientifically proven to be fact



The Big Bang is also a theory taught in schools and while it is widely accepted it still is not fact.

Cars evolve over time too, god merely created a way so that his designs improve themselves. Evolution is based upon changing code so without the code there is nothing to evolve thus god becomes a scientific need, just like dark matter

 

[Blues Man]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

Dinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?

Wrong question. You should be asking where did the code that evolves come from as code does not spontaneously generate

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

And, on you three.....the indoctrination worked.

As long as there are weak-minded, easily led folks, Militant Secularism will succeed.

I have never once called Evolution a fact. If you think I have then please find that quote and post it.

When you can't find that quote, will you have the integrity to admit you just lied about my stance?

I bet not.

In the meanwhile you have not provided any proof that any text books used in US public schools state that evolution is a proven scientific fact.

Didn't you ask me to find Darwinist propaganda in textbooks?

I sure put a cork in your pie hole, huh?

You need to learn to read

I asked you for evidence that the public school text books call the Theory of evolution a scientifically proven fact.

That is after all what you are whining about isn't it??????????????????????????????????

You need to learn to read: I gave you two examples the texts used to 'prove' Darwin.

Both are lies.

And in neither example were the words "scientifically proven fact" present. And the second one was some 19th century crap that you have not proven is still being taught in public schools today.

The fact is we do see both animal and plant species change over time due to many external factors. You agreed that speciation can happen in plants and I posted a link to what biologists believe to be the onset of speciation in a bird population.

So are you denying these things too?

So please post something from a widely used public school text that definitively states Darwin's Theory of evolution is a scientifically proven fact. That is you argument is it not?

Maybe you don't realize that saying we can see changes in animal species over time is not the same as saying Darwin's theory has been scientifically proven to be fact



The Big Bang is also a theory taught in schools and while it is widely accepted it still is not fact.

Cars evolve over time too, god merely created a way so that his designs improve themselves. Evolution is based upon changing code so without the code there is nothing to evolve thus god becomes a scientific need, just like dark matter

No cars rust over time.

There is no comparison between an inanimate object and a living thing.

And when you can give me scientific proof that some supreme being exists and that same supreme being snapped his fingers and created everything let me know.

DNA could have existed long before life itself

The idea that life began with RNA – simpler than DNA – looks less certain now that a DNA-like molecule has been made from basic compounds

www.newscientist.com

Chemists are close to demonstrating that the building blocks of DNA can form spontaneously from chemicals thought to be present on the primordial Earth.


After decades of trying, in 2009 researchers finally managed to generate RNA using chemicals that probably existed on the early Earth. Matthew Powner, now at University College London, and his colleagues synthesised two of the four nucleotides that make up RNA. Their achievement suggested that RNA may have formed spontaneously – powerful support for the idea that life began in an “RNA world”.

Did life emerge in the 'primordial soup' via DNA or RNA? Maybe both

Scientists have long debated which genetic information carrier—DNA or RNA—started life on Earth, but a new study suggests life could have begun with a bit of both. The research, led by scientists from the Medical Research Council (MRC) Laboratory of Molecular Biology (LMB), in Cambridge, shows...

phys.org

 

[Grumblenuts]

Cars evolve over time too, god merely created a way so that his designs improve themselves. Evolution is based upon changing code so without the code there is nothing to evolve thus god becomes a scientific need, just like dark matter

What if "dark matter" created "the code"? Could "dark matter" not be "god"?

 

[alang1216]

Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.

No true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.

Define "fact."

Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or something

All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!

If there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.

They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.

Just like human designers reuse workable body plans

Dinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?

Wrong question. You should be asking where did the code that evolves come from as code does not spontaneously generate

Wrong analogy. Molecules spontaneously assemble and break apart. If there were some fundamental law, like maybe only the fittest survive, you may yourself some evolution.

Molecules do not have dna, also molecules do not do anything spontaneously they break or join as their charges and weights determine

Molecules do not have dna, so? A molecule does not do anything spontaneously they break or join as their charges and weights determine. Many molecules however behave more randomly. If you heat up water, not all the molecules will turn from liquid to vapor at the same time.

State changes do not involve code

Everything is code.