Re-Setting The Nuclear Threat Clock

[HUGGY]

OK...I've heard enough.

Too many crazy ******* brain washed assholes have nuclear arms in the world now. It is time to re-set the nuclear threat clock the only way that sends a crystal clear message of the folly of threatening people of the world with nuclear weapons. Use them. Use them NOW on North Korea. Bomb thier idiot leader. Bomb thier brain washed military.

I'm truly sorry that the comon people in North Korea are so stupid and weak that they are willing to believe in such sociopathic leaders. While they are willing to submit to leaders that starve them and keep that tradgedy within the borders of thier country we cannot blow them to nuclear dust.

If they are willing to co-sign a mutual suicide pact by allowing thier leaders to threaten the rest of the world.. specifically the United Staes with nuclear harm then I have to admit that they have crossed a very dangerous line and no longer have my sympathy or protection.

We must bomb them now and make a perfectly clear statement to the rest of the brain washed morons with nukes on the planet. This message will be heard clearly in places like Iran and India and Pakistan.

NO NEGOTIATING with these stupid *****. Kill them now. I would say that if there is no one in North Korea willing to step up and kill thier leader NOW while there is still time then there is no one left in thier country left worth saving from themselves.

I am sorry to come to this conclusion. The cancer must be cut away from the body of humanity. The North Koreans must be eliminated from the future of humanity and it must be removed with no warning and no more discussion. This must be done immediately. Our elected leaders of both parties must meet secretly and agree to this course of action and Obama must order a complete destruction of North Korea and the order must be carried out. After the strike the leadership of the United States of America must show complete support for Obama publicly or be arrested for treason. This IS THAT IMPORTANT!

Sean Corey.

 

[Mr. H.]

I was thinking of this yesterday. Surprised there's not been an announcement to that effect.

 

[HUGGY]

Obama should by Presidential order cancel all hotel and motel reservations for the next 6 months in California, Oregon and Washington and have those states ready to issue new EBT cards for refugees.

Then....

We should start evacuating any Japonese that don't want to get poisoned by nuclear winter immediately. Then have the president of S. Korea evacuate all it's citizens and military 50 miles South.

I wouldn't want to be a psychic reading the minds of the military personnel standing on the border of North Korea watching all the tail lights going south out of sight.

 

[waltky]

Do we really need to advertise to the terrorists where our weaknesses are???...

Report: U.S. nuclear plants remain vulnerable to terrorists
Thu August 15, 2013 > Report warns of vulnerability to terrorists, sabotage; It says reactors near coasts are particularly at risk; Government agency challenges the findings

None of the 107 nuclear facilities in the United States are protected against a high-force terrorist attack, and some are still vulnerable to the theft of bomb-grade nuclear fuel, or sabotage intended to cause a nuclear meltdown, a new report says. The Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Project (NPPP) at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas released the report Thursday. It wants to shine a light on the security gaps that still exist more than 10 years after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. "It would be a tragedy if the United States had to look back after such an attack on a nuclear reactor and say that we could have and should have done more to prevent the catastrophe," said Prof. Alan J. Kuperman, co-author of the report. The study was done at the request of the Defense Department after the Pentagon commissioned an academic study of the security vulnerabilities of the nation's 104 commercial nuclear power reactors and three civilian research reactors.

The federal agency charged with overseeing the safety of civilian nuclear facilities challenged the report. "The report released today by the Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Project is a rehash of arguments from a decade ago when the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the country were reconsidering nuclear power plant security in the wake of the September 11 attacks," David McIntyre, a spokesman with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said in a statement. "The report contains no new information or insight. The NRC has strengthened security requirements for commercial nuclear power plants and remains confident that these important facilities are adequately protected," McIntyre said. Among the shortcomings cited in the report are the lack of regulations to protect against shipborne attacks at nuclear reactors situated near the coasts of California, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina and Virginia.

The study released Thursday was done at the request of the Defense Department.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, along with the Departments of Energy and Defense follow some form of Design Basis Threat (DBT) analysis in devising the physical security plans of the nation's nuclear facilities. According to the report, there have been upgrades to the DBT scenarios since 9/11, but still fall short the authors say, because they only account for a scenario where a facility is assaulted by five to six attackers. The report criticizes what it says are differing levels of DBT approach to the facilities by the agencies that oversee them, leading to varying levels of security at facilities that contain an identical amount of nuclear assets. "Less than two dozen miles from the White House and Capitol Hill, a nuclear reactor contains bomb-grade uranium but is not required to protect against even lesser 'design basis threat' of terrorism," Kuperman said. "It would be the height of irresponsibility to fail to take action now."

Greater attention to the possibility of insiders working at such facilities, who could possibly assist in the execution of sabotage, should also be taken into account in any upgrade of security, the report said. The report calls for a uniform level of DBT for all U.S. nuclear facilities that pose catastrophic risks if attacked, while also calling on the federal government to fill any funding gaps in security preparedness that utility companies are unable to cover. From its role as an academic research organization, the NPPP says it does not take a position on nuclear power but rather pursues an agenda focused on combatting nuclear terrorism.

Nuclear facility security lacking, report says - CNN.com

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

The Russians know where our nuclear facilities are - they have been given tours of NORAD, given our defense secrets - per Obama - they have all the information necessary including the capability now to strike the United States. The North Koreans are saber rattlers. The nuclear attack will come from Russia. Not NK. NK soldiers are down in Mexico training with Chinese, Cubans, Nicaraguans. Locals down in Mexico say these troops are training on the beaches of Mexico and fisherman there have seen them.

When asked what are these soldiers training for they say the same thing: They are planning for the invasion of America.

There are 12 chinese bases in Mexico. Google maps have revealed that these bases are being used to store tanks, helicopters, jeeps, trucks, military equipment. What are they storing these weapons down in Mexico for? The ground invasion of America. That is the reality of the situation and where we stand right now.

 

[sambino510]

I'm gonna go ahead and say this is probably not the best idea. I understand your frustration with countries like North Korea, but frankly, we just don't know what kind of side effects sending dozens of nuclear missiles into a relatively small area would have. I'm no scientist, but I have a funny feeling that would have repercussions not just for Japan but for much of Asia, even parts of Europe, India, and who knows, maybe the whole world. Not to mention the fact that if we went and used weapons, other people who you have cited as irrational, nervous countries would get even MORE nervous and maybe use some of their own on us.

A nuclear strike would have consequences far too complex for us to simply decide that North Korea must be wiped off the map. We have no idea how it'll effect the environment, and even less of an idea how it will effect international politics for years to come. Not to mention the damage it could potentially do to our buddies up north (China) or down south (South Korea).

 

[Mushroom]

There are 12 chinese bases in Mexico. Google maps have revealed that these bases are being used to store tanks, helicopters, jeeps, trucks, military equipment. What are they storing these weapons down in Mexico for? The ground invasion of America. That is the reality of the situation and where we stand right now.

No, there are no Chinese bases in Mexico. This is yet another of those nonsense rumors that have been floating around for over a decade now, and not a single scrap of evidence has ever surfaced, and most of it all seems to come from the same nutcase, Steve Quayle.

Of course this is the same guy that has claimed that the government was going to seize everybody's gold, and was caught in a raffle scam, in addition to attacking everybody who does not agree with him. Even the nutcase fringe thinks he is a nutcase.

And this is where the stories of "Chinese Bases in Mexico" keep coming from.