Raskin Calls For Impeachment of Elon Musk Who Is NOT in Elected Office

[Lesh]

And Musk is not, under any reasonable interpretation of the Impeachment Clause.

And gee… not even Raskin is calling for Musk to be impeached

Come on. You can do better

 

[Lesh]

Here ya go, moron.


You can search all the fraudulent expenditures in the .gov link.

That was a YUGE fail

But typical

 

[Nostra]

Yet somehow Elmo claims to know the net worth of government employees

Is he lying?

If so that’s an issue all on its own

Are you always this stupid. (rhetorical)

Mitch McConnell- Net Worth - Personal Finances

Mitch McConnell's estimated net worth for 2018 is $34,137,534. Learn more about their investments and assets.

www.opensecrets.org

 

[Nostra]

That was a YUGE fail

But typical

I bring a .gov website confirming the payments and all you have is “Nuh-uh”.

You lose, Loser.

 

[Rawley]

And gee… not even Raskin is calling for Musk to be impeached

"Rep. Jamie Raskin: A guy who is not even eligible to run for president is acting as president. A guy who would be impeached immediately because he is taking billions of dollars in foreign government emoluments from all over the world. And some people have been actually talking about impeaching President Elon Musk right now on the theory that he’s usurped the policies of the president."

Is he talking about a different Elon Musk?

 

[Lesh]

"Rep. Jamie Raskin: A guy who is not even eligible to run for president is acting as president. A guy who would be impeached immediately because he is taking billions of dollars in foreign government emoluments from all over the world. And some people have been actually talking about impeaching President Elon Musk right now on the theory that he’s usurped the policies of the president."

Is he talking about a different Elon Musk?

He wasn’t calling for impeachment… at least not there

Can you read?

 

[Nostra]

He wasn’t calling for impeachment… at least not there

Can you read?

Oooooooops!

 

[WelfareQueen]

"Democrats Are Losing It… Rep. Raskin Calls For Impeachment of Elon Musk Who Is NOT in Elected Office (VIDEO)




Democrats continued their meltdown on Tuesday.

Democrat lawmakers are having such a difficult time with Elon Musk and Donald Trump rooting out waste, fraud and communism in the halls of the US Capitol.

On Tuesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) called for the impeachment of Elon Musk, who is not an elected official.

Democrats are so scared of what Elon is yet to find that they want to “impeach” him."

Democrats Are Losing It... Rep. Raskin Calls For Impeachment of Elon Musk Who Is NOT in Elected Office (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

In a surprising turn of events, Rep. Jamie Raskin calls for the impeachment of Elon Musk, sparking fierce debate over the implications of such a move. What lies behind the Democrats' escalating concerns?

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The scary part is that Democrat voters are stupider than the idiots that they elect. Raskin is a clueless fool for speaking this type of nonsense.

They don't call 'em Dims for nothing.

 

[Rawley]

He wasn’t calling for impeachment… at least not there

Can you read?

Yup. You? If not, you can watch the video. He's calling Musk, "President Musk" and talking about impeachment.

 

[Lesh]

Yup. You? If not, you can watch the video. He's calling Musk, "President Musk" and talking about impeachment.

Are you seriously this stupid or can you just not accept defeat?

His reference to President Musk is clearly sarcasm and he points out that Impeachment is not on the table

 

[WEATHER53]

Raskin had installed bike lanes on dedicated 6 lane state routes in Mont Co reducing them to congested 4 lane and Zero bikes use them because traffic is moving at 40 mph. More liberal folly of punish the productive car owners and let’s all virtue signal and get on our bicycles, Also decreased 6 lane Georgia Ave to 25 mph because illegals walk out into the street too much .Major boob poser

 

[Rawley]

Are you seriously this stupid or can you just not accept defeat?

Backatcha

His reference to President Musk is clearly sarcasm and he points out that Impeachment is not on the table

He does? Did he send you some kind of private message that none of the rest of us are privy to?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Justification for my opinion is all over television, all over social media, all over USMB. Perhaps you could point me to your posts defending or even accepting Elon or, if not that, defending ferreting waste, fraud, graft, inefficiency, ineffectiveness, corruption out of government?

Thank as you will, princess.

 

[WEATHER53]

Lib children very very big on name calling. Absent lying, it’s their sole effort of rebuttal

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Commander-in-chief

The president is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces as well as all federalized United States Militia and may exercise supreme operational command and control over them.

President giving orders to soldiers plainly falls under presidential powers. And it's not some sort a hypothetical - Presidents have ordered killings of individuals before, the only difference is that now they can kill without any reservations of having to face criminal charges if they do so for corrupt or negligent reasons.

7 Pages That Gave President Obama Cover to Kill Americans

A newly released memo from the Office of Legal Counsel calls the wisdom of David Barron's lifetime appointment to a federal judgeship into question.

www.theatlantic.com

So you can stop posting ignorant bullshit and go read the SCOTUS deliberation on the topic.

I've linked you to a summary of it and all you have to do stop your silly fantasies and try to understand it.

I’m fine with declaring that the president ordering the military to kill democrat opposition wouldn’t be covered under the recent ruling, at all.

You’re just parroting CNN/MSNBC doomsday hyperbole. Nobody buys your crazy claims about Trump. He’s already been president for 4 years and noone was murdered or nuked, and if he can do so now why isn’t he having all the democrats gunned down?

Because it’s not allowed (I can’t believe I have to explain this to a supposed adult)

 

[WEATHER53]

I’m fine with declaring that the president ordering the military to kill democrat opposition wouldn’t be covered under the recent ruling, at all.

You’re just parroting CNN/MSNBC doomsday hyperbole. Nobody buys your crazy claims about Trump. He’s already been president for 4 years and noone was murdered or nuked, and if he can do so now why isn’t he having all the democrats gunned down?

Because it’s not allowed (I can’t believe I have to explain this to a supposed adult)

Fear is all they have because facts fail them

 

[jc456]

Here ya go, moron.


You can search all the fraudulent expenditures in the .gov link.

Nostra, that would have meant time to research and that goes against who she is.

 

[jc456]

And gee… not even Raskin is calling for Musk to be impeached

Come on. You can do better

well there is this story

Key House Democrat rips Musk for usurping presidential powers, says some have discussed impeachment

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said Elon Musk was acting as if he were the president of the United States through his DOGE cost-cutting efforts.

www.foxnews.com

 

[AntonToo]

I’m fine with declaring that the president ordering the military to kill democrat opposition wouldn’t be covered under the recent ruling, at all.

You’re just parroting CNN/MSNBC doomsday hyperbole. Nobody buys your crazy claims about Trump.

...again you are posting nonsense - President ordering the millitary to kill IS COVERED BY RECENT RULING - it's a presdiential act and thus immune from criminal investigation and prosecution.


Moving on - what "doomsday hyperbole"? Quote me or retract.

 

[jc456]

That was a YUGE fail

But typical

so you admit you're lazy!