Raskin Calls For Impeachment of Elon Musk Who Is NOT in Elected Office

Last edited:
A story in which he doesn’t call for Misk to be impeached?

That one?
When one can't even read the title.

Elon Musk

Key House Democrat rips Musk for usurping presidential powers, says some have discussed impeachment

 
When one can't even read the title.

Elon Musk

Key House Democrat rips Musk for usurping presidential powers, says some have discussed impeachment

Not Riskin… according to your link
 
Not Riskin… according to your link
right after the title. Whose name?

Musk has usurped the powers of the presidency, said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md.​

 
right after the title. Whose name?

Musk has usurped the powers of the presidency, said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md.​

Where does he call for impeachment stupid?

Damn. You’re on a bad roll
 
Raskin had installed bike lanes on dedicated 6 lane state routes in Mont Co reducing them to congested 4 lane and Zero bikes use them because traffic is moving at 40 mph. More liberal folly of punish the productive car owners and let’s all virtue signal and get on our bicycles, Also decreased 6 lane Georgia Ave to 25 mph because illegals walk out into the street too much .Major boob poser
Progs love pain. Raskin knows that others pay for his power king theatrics. So arrogant that he relies on the Republicans support of Israel while he shits on them purposely to support other things as a Progressive. If the Republicans suddenly changed their views on Israel, it would be interesting to see if Raskin changes his rhetoric. Trust until you do not.
 
Progs love pain. Raskin knows that others pay for his power king theatrics. So arrogant that he relies on the Republicans support of Israel while he shits on them purposely to support other things as a Progressive. If the Republicans suddenly changed their views on Israel, it would be interesting to see if Raskin changes his rhetoric. Trust until you do not.
He thinks it’s social justice advocacy to close road lanes we pay for so bikes can ride in the right lane which they Never Do because the two lanes next to them are going 40+ mph but boy is he a virtuous one saving the planet.
 
Last edited:
...again you are posting nonsense - President ordering the millitary to kill IS COVERED BY RECENT RULING - it's a presdiential act and thus immune from criminal investigation and prosecution.
A “presidential act” has to be within the confines of a presidential duties. It’s not “anything the president says goes”

My goodness


 
A “presidential act” has to be within the confines of a presidential duties. It’s not “anything the president says goes”

My goodness
POWERS, it is within presidential POWERS.

It is OF COURSE within Presidential POWERS to issue orders to our military, a president therefore cannot be criminally investigated for issuing them, his motives for such presidential act cannot be questioned by the prosecutors.

Again, read the POTUS deliberation and take your ignorant spin elsewhere.
 
"Democrats Are Losing It… Rep. Raskin Calls For Impeachment of Elon Musk Who Is NOT in Elected Office (VIDEO)




Democrats continued their meltdown on Tuesday.

Democrat lawmakers are having such a difficult time with Elon Musk and Donald Trump rooting out waste, fraud and communism in the halls of the US Capitol.

On Tuesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) called for the impeachment of Elon Musk, who is not an elected official.

Democrats are so scared of what Elon is yet to find that they want to “impeach” him."




The scary part is that Democrat voters are stupider than the idiots that they elect. Raskin is a clueless fool for speaking this type of nonsense.

Dumbocrats dont think anyways, THEY FEEL. You win their vote by how you make them FEEL.
Trump has high approval ratings which means his activities are resonating with the Masses whom are waking up.
 
POWERS, it is within presidential POWERS.

It is OF COURSE within Presidential POWERS to issue orders to our military, a president therefore cannot be criminally investigated for issuing them, his motives for such presidential act cannot be questioned by the prosecutors.

Again, read the POTUS deliberation and take your ignorant spin elsewhere.
Dude, you’re just too obtuse. It’s like im explaining obvious things to a freshman in high school. I won’t stop you from worrying about boogeymen that don’t exist. Carry on
 
Just to repeat an FYI….

You don’t have to be elected to be able to be impeached.

WW
You do have to be the president, vice president, a civil officer, or federal judge, which he is not.

The Constitution states:
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

He is none of those.
 
I’m fine with declaring that the president ordering the military to kill democrat opposition wouldn’t be covered under the recent ruling, at all.

You’re just parroting CNN/MSNBC doomsday hyperbole. Nobody buys your crazy claims about Trump. He’s already been president for 4 years and noone was murdered or nuked, and if he can do so now why isn’t he having all the democrats gunned down?

Because it’s not allowed (I can’t believe I have to explain this to a supposed adult)
I can 't believe an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court would say that the President is now immune from murder charges if he ordered Navy's Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival.
 
The only reason I think why people don't just ignore you, is probably the same reason I don't. You are one seriously funny dude! It is sad however that it is not an act and you really are that stupid!

Funny?

but I'm funny how, I mean funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? I make you laugh, I'm here to fucking amuse you? What do you mean funny, funny how? How am I funny?
 
Trump Executive Order to end birthright citizenship - already ruled as brazen violation of Constitution.

Can you refute that fact?


Trump's immediate firing of 18 AG's brazenly violated law that required 30 days notice to Congress with specific reasoning.

Can you refute that fact?
What fact is there of a brazen violation of the constitution as opposed to a mere pedestrian violation? The USSC is the final arbiter of violations so link us to the USSC ruling on your claimed “brazen violation”.
 
Back
Top Bottom