Random Truths

[SAYIT]

That form of socialism comes from Religion. Socialism requires social morals for free.
In any case, we have a general welfare clause. Why is there any homeless in Right to Work States; should we enact, "Truth in legislative Advertising laws"?

"Socialism requires social morals for free."

WTF does that mean? If you are saying it requires humans to be something they aren't, you are barking up that utopian "Worker's Paradise" tree which has repeatedly proven to be an abject failure (but it will work this time, right comrade?).

As to your question, there are many reasons some are rich and some are poor (and homeless) and we have homeless in all states. The rich aren't rich because the poor are poor and vice versa.

We need our gov't to provide a level play-field and equal opportunities ... not equal outcomes.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That form of socialism comes from Religion. Socialism requires social morals for free.
In any case, we have a general welfare clause. Why is there any homeless in Right to Work States; should we enact, "Truth in legislative Advertising laws"?

"Socialism requires social morals for free."

WTF does that mean? If you are saying it requires humans to be something they aren't, you are barking up that utopian "Worker's Paradise" tree which has repeatedly proven to be an abject failure (but it will work this time, right comrade?).

As to your question, there are many reasons some are rich and some are poor (and homeless) and we have homeless in all states. The rich aren't rich because the poor are poor and vice versa.

"...there are many reasons some are rich and some are poor..."

What if everyone starts off with the same amount of money?


“…. by the end of the first year, some people will have more than others. Guaranteed. Some people, you see, will be careful with what they have. Others won’t. Some people will gamble, others will save. Some will spend lavishly, others will be frugal.

Besides that, some people simply have more of the kind of wealth that can’t be redistributed. Intelligence; education; ambition. Drive, as opposed to: aw, we’re gonna get what we’re gonna get anyway, so let’s just stay on the couch and watch TV. Some people will put a little giddy-up in their get-alongs, and will find ways to improve their own lives.

Some of that will be “unfair,” because some people have more and better resources to tap. Intelligence; talent; family. Even accounting for such differences, though: some people will turn what they have into more, while others will not. Therefore, by the end of the very first year (not to mention the first five or ten) “haves” and “have-nots” will appear.

I know what you’re thinking. Crap. I thought we had it this time. Fairness! And this return to economic inequity will happen, I daresay, even under the strictest Communist policies.

I’ll come back to that.

After ten, twenty, thirty years, those discrepancies will widen. A middle class will form. An upper economic class, and a lower economic class. These classes will not be dead ends: people will be able to move from one to another and back again. But they’ll reappear, despite the original, radical redistribution of wealth.

So: let’s take this exercise further. Rather than a one-time redistribution of wealth, let’s redistribute every year. Every April 23 – Michael Moore’s birthday – all wealth is redistributed. All wages set by Central Command. Everyone is as equal as it’s possible to make them. Even individual advantages are nullified.

Not really, but we’ll come back to that, too.

Obviously, that system does away with any incentive to create. It removes any incentive to save; to be frugal; to work hard. Because no matter what you do, what you get is predetermined.

And yet, by April 22 of the following year, some people will still have more than others. And they’ll keep it.

How can that be? Simple. Even state-enforced economic “equality” did not – cannot – make everyone “equal.” It can only change the attributes that are most important to getting ahead.

Sucking up to your superiors becomes more important than working hard. Figuring out which bureaucrats can do the most for you, and ingratiating yourself to them.

Using the power of government to get you ahead, instead of creating, making, building, selling. Improving technical or academic skills? What for? Improving political skills. That’s what makes a difference.

You may recognize a little of our current system there. More and more, becoming a “have” in our society requires entering the bureaucracy, or getting the bureaucracy on your side.

Even the hard working entrepreneurs and innovators among us increasingly need the bureaucracy’s help. Vast mazes of regulations give bureaucracies vast power over both you and your competitors. Government can make or break an industry. Make or break a company. It can increase the cost of entry beyond plausibility, or it can make that cost go away.

In the free market, wealth comes from work. The closer we move toward socialism, the more wealth comes from power. That’s the difference. The similarity: wealth still exists in relatively few hands.”
What if we just gave everybody the same amount of wealth? | John Hawkins' Right Wing News

 

[Hutch Starskey]

There are so many conservative commentators, and conversations, that have contributed to these truths....you may recognize some of your words, as well.....

1. The Left survives on demonization of the Right…rather than debating ideas: they teach their drones that the Right is not wrong, but evil…
2. The minute you envy another, your happiness is injured,and breeds unhappiness. Religious folks tend to be happy with what they have. Thus Marx hated that view because the Utopia had to be here and now…
3. Government must be limited in scope Madison: laws must be simple clear few. Must be understood by all: otherwise it is government by experts, bureaucrats and technocrats. a. Sure enough, Liberals snap to attention when they hear 'studies show....'
4. Unlimited opportunity can only come with limited government.
5. What leftism has done to every profession is to put leftism above being good at the task…
   a. Famine under communist rule in the USSR is a perfect example.
   
   6. The danger is not a man like Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting the office of the presidency to a man like Barack Obama
   
   7. The mind of the Liberal: Whatever they imagine, they believe must be imposed.
   
   8. For Liberals, wishful thinking substitutes for an understanding of reality…thus…the view of the Arab Spring as a good thing…and overthrowing of Mubarak in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood
   
   9. We want liberty…but mistakenly say democracy…you can have democracy but deprive people of liberty (see Egypt)
   
   10. If the desire is for a ‘level playing field,’ how to explain progressive income tax?

 

[PoliticalChic]

There are so many conservative commentators, and conversations, that have contributed to these truths....you may recognize some of your words, as well.....

1. The Left survives on demonization of the Right…rather than debating ideas: they teach their drones that the Right is not wrong, but evil…
2. The minute you envy another, your happiness is injured,and breeds unhappiness. Religious folks tend to be happy with what they have. Thus Marx hated that view because the Utopia had to be here and now…
3. Government must be limited in scope Madison: laws must be simple clear few. Must be understood by all: otherwise it is government by experts, bureaucrats and technocrats. a. Sure enough, Liberals snap to attention when they hear 'studies show....'
4. Unlimited opportunity can only come with limited government.
5. What leftism has done to every profession is to put leftism above being good at the task…
   a. Famine under communist rule in the USSR is a perfect example.
   
   6. The danger is not a man like Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting the office of the presidency to a man like Barack Obama
   
   7. The mind of the Liberal: Whatever they imagine, they believe must be imposed.
   
   8. For Liberals, wishful thinking substitutes for an understanding of reality…thus…the view of the Arab Spring as a good thing…and overthrowing of Mubarak in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood
   
   9. We want liberty…but mistakenly say democracy…you can have democracy but deprive people of liberty (see Egypt)
   
   10. If the desire is for a ‘level playing field,’ how to explain progressive income tax?

View attachment 121925

Excellent!

You provide proof that

a. My posts are a burr under your saddle....you donkey

b. You have no cogent way to dispute any of what I post...i.e., I am 100% correct.


Don't ever change.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

There are so many conservative commentators, and conversations, that have contributed to these truths....you may recognize some of your words, as well.....

1. The Left survives on demonization of the Right…rather than debating ideas: they teach their drones that the Right is not wrong, but evil…
2. The minute you envy another, your happiness is injured,and breeds unhappiness. Religious folks tend to be happy with what they have. Thus Marx hated that view because the Utopia had to be here and now…
3. Government must be limited in scope Madison: laws must be simple clear few. Must be understood by all: otherwise it is government by experts, bureaucrats and technocrats. a. Sure enough, Liberals snap to attention when they hear 'studies show....'
4. Unlimited opportunity can only come with limited government.
5. What leftism has done to every profession is to put leftism above being good at the task…
   a. Famine under communist rule in the USSR is a perfect example.
   
   6. The danger is not a man like Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting the office of the presidency to a man like Barack Obama
   
   7. The mind of the Liberal: Whatever they imagine, they believe must be imposed.
   
   8. For Liberals, wishful thinking substitutes for an understanding of reality…thus…the view of the Arab Spring as a good thing…and overthrowing of Mubarak in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood
   
   9. We want liberty…but mistakenly say democracy…you can have democracy but deprive people of liberty (see Egypt)
   
   10. If the desire is for a ‘level playing field,’ how to explain progressive income tax?

View attachment 121925

Excellent!

You provide proof that

a. My posts are a burr under your saddle....you donkey

b. You have no cogent way to dispute any of what I post...i.e., I am 100% correct.


Don't ever change.

You've been dismissed as a fool.

 

[SAYIT]

That form of socialism comes from Religion. Socialism requires social morals for free.
In any case, we have a general welfare clause. Why is there any homeless in Right to Work States; should we enact, "Truth in legislative Advertising laws"?

"Socialism requires social morals for free."

WTF does that mean? If you are saying it requires humans to be something they aren't, you are barking up that utopian "Worker's Paradise" tree which has repeatedly proven to be an abject failure (but it will work this time, right comrade?).

As to your question, there are many reasons some are rich and some are poor (and homeless) and we have homeless in all states. The rich aren't rich because the poor are poor and vice versa.

"...there are many reasons some are rich and some are poor..."

What if everyone starts off with the same amount of money?


“…. by the end of the first year, some people will have more than others. Guaranteed. Some people, you see, will be careful with what they have. Others won’t. Some people will gamble, others will save. Some will spend lavishly, others will be frugal.

Besides that, some people simply have more of the kind of wealth that can’t be redistributed. Intelligence; education; ambition. Drive, as opposed to: aw, we’re gonna get what we’re gonna get anyway, so let’s just stay on the couch and watch TV. Some people will put a little giddy-up in their get-alongs, and will find ways to improve their own lives.

Some of that will be “unfair,” because some people have more and better resources to tap. Intelligence; talent; family. Even accounting for such differences, though: some people will turn what they have into more, while others will not. Therefore, by the end of the very first year (not to mention the first five or ten) “haves” and “have-nots” will appear.

I know what you’re thinking. Crap. I thought we had it this time. Fairness! And this return to economic inequity will happen, I daresay, even under the strictest Communist policies.

I’ll come back to that.

After ten, twenty, thirty years, those discrepancies will widen. A middle class will form. An upper economic class, and a lower economic class. These classes will not be dead ends: people will be able to move from one to another and back again. But they’ll reappear, despite the original, radical redistribution of wealth.

So: let’s take this exercise further. Rather than a one-time redistribution of wealth, let’s redistribute every year. Every April 23 – Michael Moore’s birthday – all wealth is redistributed. All wages set by Central Command. Everyone is as equal as it’s possible to make them. Even individual advantages are nullified.

Not really, but we’ll come back to that, too.

Obviously, that system does away with any incentive to create. It removes any incentive to save; to be frugal; to work hard. Because no matter what you do, what you get is predetermined.

And yet, by April 22 of the following year, some people will still have more than others. And they’ll keep it.

How can that be? Simple. Even state-enforced economic “equality” did not – cannot – make everyone “equal.” It can only change the attributes that are most important to getting ahead.

Sucking up to your superiors becomes more important than working hard. Figuring out which bureaucrats can do the most for you, and ingratiating yourself to them.

Using the power of government to get you ahead, instead of creating, making, building, selling. Improving technical or academic skills? What for? Improving political skills. That’s what makes a difference.

You may recognize a little of our current system there. More and more, becoming a “have” in our society requires entering the bureaucracy, or getting the bureaucracy on your side.

Even the hard working entrepreneurs and innovators among us increasingly need the bureaucracy’s help. Vast mazes of regulations give bureaucracies vast power over both you and your competitors. Government can make or break an industry. Make or break a company. It can increase the cost of entry beyond plausibility, or it can make that cost go away.

In the free market, wealth comes from work. The closer we move toward socialism, the more wealth comes from power. That’s the difference. The similarity: wealth still exists in relatively few hands.”
What if we just gave everybody the same amount of wealth? | John Hawkins' Right Wing News

That is as intuitive as it is well-written but there are those who can not understand its meaning and those who simply close their eyes and cover their ears at even the first hint of non-socialist truths.

I found most significant his conclusion ("In the free market, wealth comes from work. The closer we move toward socialism, the more wealth comes from power. That’s the difference") and the observation that gov't intrusion in our markets and industries often unlevels or so distorts the play-field that it destroys the very things that spur private innovation, invention, and discovery.

 

[SAYIT]

There are so many conservative commentators, and conversations, that have contributed to these truths....you may recognize some of your words, as well.....

1. The Left survives on demonization of the Right…rather than debating ideas: they teach their drones that the Right is not wrong, but evil…
2. The minute you envy another, your happiness is injured,and breeds unhappiness. Religious folks tend to be happy with what they have. Thus Marx hated that view because the Utopia had to be here and now…
3. Government must be limited in scope Madison: laws must be simple clear few. Must be understood by all: otherwise it is government by experts, bureaucrats and technocrats. a. Sure enough, Liberals snap to attention when they hear 'studies show....'
4. Unlimited opportunity can only come with limited government.
5. What leftism has done to every profession is to put leftism above being good at the task…
   a. Famine under communist rule in the USSR is a perfect example.
   
   6. The danger is not a man like Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting the office of the presidency to a man like Barack Obama
   
   7. The mind of the Liberal: Whatever they imagine, they believe must be imposed.
   
   8. For Liberals, wishful thinking substitutes for an understanding of reality…thus…the view of the Arab Spring as a good thing…and overthrowing of Mubarak in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood
   
   9. We want liberty…but mistakenly say democracy…you can have democracy but deprive people of liberty (see Egypt)
   
   10. If the desire is for a ‘level playing field,’ how to explain progressive income tax?

View attachment 121925

Excellent!

You provide proof that

a. My posts are a burr under your saddle....you donkey

b. You have no cogent way to dispute any of what I post...i.e., I am 100% correct.


Don't ever change.

You've been dismissed as a fool.

You have hardly proven fit to be the judge of other's.

 

[PoliticalChic]

147. Blacks voted en masse for Obama:
2008 - 95% of black vote
2012 - 93% of black vote

Why do blacks vote for blacks?
It is irrelevant how many of your skin-folks one has in office. The most successful racial group in America has almost no same race elected officials: Asian-Americans......who have the highest incomes, the highest educational attainment, the lowest crime rates....

Yet.....hardly any 'rabbis' in office.

 

[PoliticalChic]

148. You could not have loved what you wish to fundamentally transform....QED, Democrats/Liberals have been trained not to love this nation, and two famous statements encapsulate the search:
"There are those that look at things the way they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not ?" Attributed to Robert Kennedy.

The other is from the words of John Lennon’s song, “Imagine.” One is asked to imagine that there is no heaven or hell, that everyone lives for today; that there are no countries, nothing to kill for, and no religion; there are no possessions- therefore no greed nor hunger.

1. {Lennon stated: "'Imagine', which says: 'Imagine that there was no more religion, no more country, no more politics,' is virtually the Communist manifesto, even though I'm not particularly a Communist and I do not belong to any movement."}
   Imagine (song) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Conservatives don’t dream of things that never were nearly so much as Liberals do. We usually dream the same dream that our forefathers did: an America that is identified by the “American Trinity” of “Liberty,” “In God We Trust,” and “E Pluribus Unum.” And, judging by history, we have seen that ‘utopian dreams’ are more likely to end up as nightmares.

 

[postman]

147. Blacks voted en masse for Obama:
2008 - 95% of black vote
2012 - 93% of black vote

Why do blacks vote for blacks?
It is irrelevant how many of your skin-folks one has in office. The most successful racial group in America has almost no same race elected officials: Asian-Americans......who have the highest incomes, the highest educational attainment, the lowest crime rates....

Yet.....hardly any 'rabbis' in office.

Let me remind you that nearly 95% of blacks voted for Bill Clinton, the other white meat.

You will find that blacks have voted around 90% democratic, ever since the republicans and democrats switched racial positions in the 1960's (see civil rights act, voting rights act etc)

 

[SAYIT]

147. Blacks voted en masse for Obama:
2008 - 95% of black vote
2012 - 93% of black vote

Why do blacks vote for blacks?
It is irrelevant how many of your skin-folks one has in office. The most successful racial group in America has almost no same race elected officials: Asian-Americans......who have the highest incomes, the highest educational attainment, the lowest crime rates....

Yet.....hardly any 'rabbis' in office.

Shrillary could not turn out the base that elected and reelected Obama. She garnered only 66 mil votes (with 72 mil registered Dems) while Trump received 63 mil (with only 55 mil registered Repubs).

Meanwhile, where the pop vote was the deciding electoral factor:

Repub House & Senate majorities
33 Repub governors
32 Repub majority state legislatures

That represents over 1000 formerly Dem legislative seats lost to the Repubs since 2009.

Woo. Epic. New DNC boss Perez is soon to tour "purple states" with Sanders who is promoting "progressive momentum" as the force to drive the "new & improved" Dem Party. Yeah.

 

[postman]

Shrillary could not turn out the base that elected and reelected Obama. She garnered only 66 mil votes (with 72 mil registered Dems) while Trump received 63 mil (with only 55 mil registered Repubs).
.

Usually somebody getting 66 million to 63 million would be considered the winner.

 

[SAYIT]

Shrillary could not turn out the base that elected and reelected Obama. She garnered only 66 mil votes (with 72 mil registered Dems) while Trump received 63 mil (with only 55 mil registered Repubs).

Meanwhile, where the pop vote was the deciding electoral factor:

Repub House & Senate majorities
33 Repub governors
32 Repub majority state legislatures

That represents over 1000 formerly Dem legislative seats lost to the Repubs since 2009.

Woo. Epic. New DNC boss Perez is soon to tour "purple states" with Sanders who is promoting "progressive momentum" as the force to drive the "new & improved" Dem Party. Yeah..

Usually somebody getting 66 million to 63 million would be considered the winner.

She was!

 

[PoliticalChic]

147. Blacks voted en masse for Obama:
2008 - 95% of black vote
2012 - 93% of black vote

Why do blacks vote for blacks?
It is irrelevant how many of your skin-folks one has in office. The most successful racial group in America has almost no same race elected officials: Asian-Americans......who have the highest incomes, the highest educational attainment, the lowest crime rates....

Yet.....hardly any 'rabbis' in office.

Let me remind you that nearly 95% of blacks voted for Bill Clinton, the other white meat.

You will find that blacks have voted around 90% democratic, ever since the republicans and democrats switched racial positions in the 1960's (see civil rights act, voting rights act etc)

1. "Let me remind you that nearly 95% of blacks voted for Bill Clinton, "
Clearly you continue to bloviate, but know nothing.
84% in '96
83% in '92

2. The truth of my post...
"Why do blacks vote for blacks?
It is irrelevant how many of your skin-folks one has in office."

....is easily verified:

1. Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...st-ground-every-single-economic#ixzz2hihAOpVl


2. (CNSNews.com) – The unemployment rate for black Americans is more than double that of white Americans, according to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).... In the numbers released today, covering the month of June, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for black Americans age 16 and over was 10.7%, reported the BLS. The unemployment rate for white Americans in the same age group and time-frame was 5.3%, said the BLS. Black Unemployment 10.7%, More Than Double White Unemployment 5.3%

3. "CHICAGO (Reuters) - Predominantly African-American neighborhoods in Chicago have seen poverty rise and services diminish even as the nation's third largest city has become less racially segregated,.... black areas are seeing economic stagnation or decline,.... mostly black areas have lost health clinics, social service agencies and other areas of support..." Exclusive: Poverty up, services diminished in Chicago's black neighborhoods - study


4. The National Urban League issued an "excellent" report card for President Obama's eight years, but highlighted numerous and important "failures," so many that they totaled 42 percent of its review.

"While we scored many of the administration's achievements with our highest rating, 'Superior,' President Obama's tenure as a whole had shortcomings due to some notable missed opportunities and outright failures, such as the economic development of urban centers, gun violence and the foreclosure rate and bank closure rate in communities of color and low-income neighborhoods. On these and other issues, we rated the Obama administration 'Fair' or 'Poor,'" wrote Urban League President Marc H. Morial.

The 16-page report card reviewed eight areas of policy impacting urban areas and African Americans, and found that Obama's success to failure rate at 57.5 percent to 42.5 percent.

Morial said Obama received the "second highest" overall grade of "excellent." http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/u...ma-failures-for-black-america/article/2611248

5. Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/IllegImmig_10-14-10_430pm.pdf


6. Record 12,202,000 Black Americans Not in Labor Force
April 3, 2015 - 10:42 AM
Record 12,202,000 Black Americans Not in Labor Force



Now...get both of your cerebral neurons working, and try to memorize this: never doubt me.....

....I am never wrong.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Shrillary could not turn out the base that elected and reelected Obama. She garnered only 66 mil votes (with 72 mil registered Dems) while Trump received 63 mil (with only 55 mil registered Repubs).
.

Usually somebody getting 66 million to 63 million would be considered the winner.

Millions of Bill's wife's votes were cast by illegal aliens....at the behest of the snake, Barack Obama, who told them to go vote.

Trump won the popular and electoral college vote.

 

[bripat9643]

That form of socialism comes from Religion. Socialism requires social morals for free.
In any case, we have a general welfare clause. Why is there any homeless in Right to Work States; should we enact, "Truth in legislative Advertising laws"?

"Socialism requires social morals for free."

WTF does that mean? If you are saying it requires humans to be something they aren't, you are barking up that utopian "Worker's Paradise" tree which has repeatedly proven to be an abject failure (but it will work this time, right comrade?).

As to your question, there are many reasons some are rich and some are poor (and homeless) and we have homeless in all states. The rich aren't rich because the poor are poor and vice versa.

We need our gov't to provide a level play-field and equal opportunities ... not equal outcomes.

Don't waste your time on Daniel. He's totally irrational.

 

[PoliticalChic]

149. A healthy society is on in which there are lots of children....where the constituents are believers in religion and in their future.
The number of children a family has correlates negatively with secularism.

A robust and growing civilization requires a growing population with a view of their own rectitude......exactly the opposite of what Liberalism engenders.
Liberals
a. Blame America First
b. Have fewer and fewer children.

America has held out largely due to the fact that it is more religious than other Western nations.


"An examination of global data also shows that the United States has a higher fertility rate than every country in continental Europe, as well as Australia, Canada and Japan. Fertility levels in those countries have been lower than the U.S. rate for several years, ...

...a strong correlation between religious values and fertility rates. The more frequent the church attendance, the higher the birthrate. "White fundamentalist Protestants" who attend services weekly show a fertility rate 27 percent higher than the national average. Mormons show twice the national birth rate.

The significant difference in fertility between the religious and the secular has some alarmed, notably Phillip Longman, author of The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity and What to Do About It.

In the March 13, 2006, issue of USA Today, he solemnly warns that this disparity will continue to fuel the rise of "fundamentalism and social conservatism," which may herald the end of the culture war and nothing less than the "death of the Enlightenment.”
A Counter Trend—Sort Of

One can only hope.




Israel fits this pattern, for the same reason.

"With a total fertility rate of three children per woman, Israel's total
population will rise to 24 million by the end of the present century. Iran's fertility is around 1.7 and falling, while the fertility for ethnic Turks is only 1.5 (the Kurdish minority has a fertility rate of around 4.5)." Asia Times Online :: Middle East News, Iraq, Iran current affairs



Liberalism, and its 'I'm all that counts' philosophy is a nail in the coffin of Western Civilization.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Shrillary could not turn out the base that elected and reelected Obama. She garnered only 66 mil votes (with 72 mil registered Dems) while Trump received 63 mil (with only 55 mil registered Repubs).
.

Usually somebody getting 66 million to 63 million would be considered the winner.

Millions of Bill's wife's votes were cast by illegal aliens....at the behest of the snake, Barack Obama, who told them to go vote.

Trump won the popular and electoral college vote.

Millions of Bill's wife's votes were cast by illegal aliens....at the behest of the snake, Barack Obama, who told them to go vote.

Trump won the popular and electoral college vote.

^ Complete and utter bullshit.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Shrillary could not turn out the base that elected and reelected Obama. She garnered only 66 mil votes (with 72 mil registered Dems) while Trump received 63 mil (with only 55 mil registered Repubs).
.

Usually somebody getting 66 million to 63 million would be considered the winner.

Millions of Bill's wife's votes were cast by illegal aliens....at the behest of the snake, Barack Obama, who told them to go vote.

Trump won the popular and electoral college vote.

Millions of Bill's wife's votes were cast by illegal aliens....at the behest of the snake, Barack Obama, who told them to go vote.

Trump won the popular and electoral college vote.

^ Complete and utter bullshit.

Exactly the sort of language one would expect from a Liberal government school grad....if that's not a redundancy.



Now...let's remind all:

illegals get driver's licenses that say no voting.....

Really?

I say Democrat's who work the polls ignore that blue bar and simply look at the name on the driver's license.

And guess what?

"It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California
If you take California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the country by 1.4 million votes.
.... if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election."
It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California


Think California is loaded with illegal alien voters??????

You betcha'!!!!





California has the largest number of illegal immigrants in the United States, with an estimated 2.4 million unauthorized immigrants making up about 6.3 percent of the state's total population, according to the Pew Research Center.Sep 14, 2015

Illegal Immigration Statistics in California - Newsmax.com
www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/illegal-immigration-California/2015/09/14/.../691462/

 

[PoliticalChic]

150. Atheism is contrary to reason.

There is a strong current of atheism, due largely to the strength of Marxism in our society, under which some 'scientists' actually claim that the universe was created out of nothing.....NOTHING.

There is prominent scientist, Lawrence Krauss, "... an American theoretical physicist andcosmologist...known as an advocate of the public understanding of science, ...and works to reduce the impact of superstition and religious dogma in pop culture. He is also the author of several bestselling books, includingThe Physics of Star Trek and A Universe from Nothing."
Lawrence M. Krauss - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


Krauss has said "we all, literally, emerged from quantum nothingness..."
Clearly an attempt to avoid the central question of where did the universe come from. Where are the quantum rules that imply a universe that must appear out of the void? Can any come up with a few examples where something has come from nothing?

Of course, the ancient Greek, Parmenides, was correct: nihil fit ex nihilo... "out of nothing, nothing [be]comes."

"Leibniz thought that the fact that there is something and not nothing requires an explanation. The explanation he gave was that God wanted to create a universe – the best one possible – which makes God the simple reason that there is something rather than nothing."
Why is there something rather than nothing?