Rand Paul Calls Out Stephanapo—whatever On Journalism

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
25,351
Reaction score
6,644
Points
280
Location
Middle class, suburban ghetto.

Angelo

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
27,522
Reaction score
13,164
Points
1,100
Location
_Arkansas~_The Natural State_
Rand Paul is never afraid to be honest, like his dad.

Stephanopoulos began by asking Paul to admit the "election was not stolen" - to which Paul responded by saying "The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur. We never had any presentation in court where we ever looked at the evidence..."
 

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
470
Reaction score
206
Points
143
Rand Paul is never afraid to be honest, like his dad.

Stephanopoulos began by asking Paul to admit the "election was not stolen" - to which Paul responded by saying "The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur. We never had any presentation in court where we ever looked at the evidence..."
Paul's relationship with the truth is like every other Republican's relationship.

Some bastard child they only talk about in private.

That is why there is a term for when Republicans screw up in public.

It's called "TRUTHING."
 

Angelo

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
27,522
Reaction score
13,164
Points
1,100
Location
_Arkansas~_The Natural State_
Paul's relationship with the truth is like every other Republican's relationship.

Some bastard child they only talk about in private.

That is why there is a term for when Republicans screw up in public.

It's called "TRUTHING."
No.
I'm a very good judge of character and Rand Paul is
a truthful person. The last Senator with his balls was Russ Feingold -- the only Senator to vote against the Patriot Act.
 
OP
RoshawnMarkwees

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
25,351
Reaction score
6,644
Points
280
Location
Middle class, suburban ghetto.
Rand Paul is never afraid to be honest, like his dad.

Stephanopoulos began by asking Paul to admit the "election was not stolen" - to which Paul responded by saying "The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur. We never had any presentation in court where we ever looked at the evidence..."
Paul's relationship with the truth is like every other Republican's relationship.

Some bastard child they only talk about in private.

That is why there is a term for when Republicans screw up in public.

It's called "TRUTHING."
Do you have a response per the thread?
 

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
23,390
Reaction score
19,250
Points
2,445
Location
The Southwestern Desert
George Snuffleupagus wants so much to be Rush Limbaugh: a commentator and not a journalist. He wants to stick his nose where it doesn't belong.

View attachment 448508
I believe with Liberals like Georgie, we should just replace "journalist" with "gerbalist". That seems fair.
 

eagle7-31

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2020
Messages
1,171
Reaction score
1,772
Points
1,908
Rand Paul pushes back against Stephanopoulos narrative - American Thinker

sticks it to Boy George


Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) appeared on ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos. The latter tried to bully Paul into accepting the Democrat narrative that Joe Biden, a corrupt, debauched old man who periodically emerged from the basement to "campaign" for president, won more votes than any candidate in presidential history, including Obama, the first sort of Black president, and Hillary, the first genetically female presidential candidate. Sen. Paul not only refused to be bullied, but he pushed back, exposing to viewers the fact that Stephanopoulos is not a journalist but is, instead, a Democrat party activist.

Stephanopoulos entered politics early, working for Michael Dukakis's 1988 presidential campaign when Stephanopoulos was in his mid-20s. In 1992, he was back again working for Bill Clinton's campaign, making his name as a spokesman for Clinton both during and after the election. Beginning in 1996, Stephanopoulos left the White House for ABC, and he's been there ever since.

Although technically a "journalist," Stephanopoulos is famously partisan, routinely serving as an attack dog for the Democrat party. He certainly showed that side of himself in the interview with Sen. Paul.

What Stephanopoulos hadn't counted on is that Paul has an advantage compared to many of the elected officials, bureaucrats, and assorted famous people whom Stephanopoulos bullies...er, interviews on his show. Paul is a principled man. His values do not change depending on where he sees an advantage to himself. That gives him a moral clarity that makes it impossible to bully him, as Stephanopoulos discovered to his cost.


In the clip that's making the rounds on the internet, Stephanopoulos opened by demanding that Paul recite the current leftist catechism, which is that Slow Joe, AKA Basement Biden, won the election fair and square: "Ah, Sen. Paul. Let me begin with a threshold question for you. This election was not stolen. Do you accept that fact?"

The message behind that aggressive question is clear: in Biden World, we must all accept the party line. Dissent will not be tolerated.

Paul was not intimidated. Instead, he said something important: there has never been an evidentiary hearing about fraud. Instead, the courts shut fraud claimants out on procedural grounds without addressing the merits. Moreover, we know there was fraud, and we know that several secretaries of state unconstitutionally and unilaterally amended voting laws, something the courts may still consider.

Stephanopoulos wasn't going to let it go. He interrupted Sen. Paul to say Trump and his allies lost all 86 challenges, completely ignoring what Sen. Paul had just said about the lack of any substantive judicial review. Stephanopoulos then went over the same old evidence — state certification (irrelevant if it was covering for fraud), recounts (irrelevant if fraudulent ballots were simply recounted), and Bill Barr's fact-free assurance that everything was fine, followed by his running away from Trump.

And then, again, the insistence that Sen. Paul parrot the official line: "Can't you just say the words that this election was not stolen?"

Sen. Paul pointed to something important, which is that we need greater confidence in our elections. He noted that 75% of Republicans agree with him, only to have Stephanopoulos interrupt to say that's only because Trump fed them a "Big Lie" (note, please, the subliminal Nazi allusion). In fact, Trump-supporters figured out on their own that crazy things happened before, during, and after the election, all of which were inconsistent with election integrity or the victory of a corrupt, debauched, increasingly demented old man who didn't campaign.

It was at this point that Sen. Paul called out the fact that Stephanopoulos is not a journalist — he's a political shill:

George, where you make a mistake is people coming from the liberal side like you, you immediately say everything's a lie instead of saying there's two sides to everything. Historically what would happen if I said I thought there were fraud, you would interview someone who said there wasn't. Now you insert yourself in the middle and say the absolute fact is everything I'm saying is a lie.
The debate between the two men continued in this vein for a few more minutes. Stephanopoulos manifestly couldn't grasp that there could be a viewpoint different from his. The only truth was his truth. His religion — not Greek Orthodoxy, but leftist orthodoxy — left him incapable of contemplating the possibility that he might be wrong.

To take the religious metaphor farther, for Stephanopoulos, there's an Inquisition going on, and heresy (in this case, the claim that there was election fraud sufficient to change the outcome) cannot be examined. Instead, it must be snuffed out as brutally and completely as possible. If he could have, Stephanopoulos would have gathered the branches and lit the matches for the most extreme form of auto-da-fe.

Please cheer Sen. Paul's valiant stand for truth and journalistic integrity, but understand that he's the heretic and that, for the time being, American power is lodged with the doctrinal purists who will brook no dissent.
 

TroglocratsRdumb

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2017
Messages
18,619
Reaction score
9,275
Points
950
Rand Paul is never afraid to be honest, like his dad.

Stephanopoulos began by asking Paul to admit the "election was not stolen" - to which Paul responded by saying "The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur. We never had any presentation in court where we ever looked at the evidence..."
Paul's relationship with the truth is like every other Republican's relationship.

Some bastard child they only talk about in private.

That is why there is a term for when Republicans screw up in public.

It's called "TRUTHING."
geez what cultist crackpot lol
 

Natural Citizen

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
13,608
Reaction score
6,692
Points
430
Rand will absolutely follow through on what he said there in the interview. The problem with the legislative bodies tht operated outside of their constitutional authority needs addressed first and foremost.

I was gonna say it's refreshing to see a representative get back in the faces of some of these obtuse talking heads, but with Rand and company it's expected.
 

Votto

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
27,450
Reaction score
10,954
Points
900
In before the lock. lol.

But yeah, one of the very few principled representatives.

He has a bright future.
Bright future?

He is an outcast in the Swamp like his father and the media hates him

The press picks their future.
 

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
122,295
Reaction score
21,970
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
Paul explains journalism to an ABC democrat propagandist...
Paul is making a completely dishonest argument by changing what Stephanopolous says. That's a strawman. And Stephanopolous calls him on it, over and over.

Watch the video.

He's also trying to snowjob the issue with this malarkey about cases not having standing and if they were looked at, they'd find.... whatever. If you don't have standing, you're not qualified to make the argument. For example Texas has no standing to tell Pennsylvania how to run its own elections. It ain't rocket surgery. Therefore whatever Texas thinks Pennsylvania did -------- IS IRRELEVANT.
 

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
470
Reaction score
206
Points
143
Paul's relationship with the truth is like every other Republican's relationship.

Some bastard child they only talk about in private.

That is why there is a term for when Republicans screw up in public.

It's called "TRUTHING."
No.
I'm a very good judge of character and Rand Paul is
a truthful person. The last Senator with his balls was Russ Feingold -- the only Senator to vote against the Patriot Act.
Bull on both counts.

If Paul were being honest he'd say:
"Honestly, we've got to do something to keep these Democrats from voting or Republicans are going to go the way of the Whigs.
Seriously, we've lost Virginia and Georgia, North Carolina and Florida are next and then Texas.
At that point any hope of a majority in either house or the presidency will be gone forever."


If he were being honest.

And, in truth, you most likely know this too. So your excusing his dishonesty shows your own.
 

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
470
Reaction score
206
Points
143
Rand Paul is never afraid to be honest, like his dad.

Stephanopoulos began by asking Paul to admit the "election was not stolen" - to which Paul responded by saying "The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur. We never had any presentation in court where we ever looked at the evidence..."
Paul's relationship with the truth is like every other Republican's relationship.

Some bastard child they only talk about in private.

That is why there is a term for when Republicans screw up in public.

It's called "TRUTHING."
Do you have a response per the thread?
I responded to a post.
If you've a problem take it up with the person to whom I responded.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top