Racist WaPo Columnist fired for spewing venom against white men

[SweetTea]

Isn’t that the essence of Charlie Kirk’s campus tours?

He sits there beneath a banner that says “prove me wrong”, pretending to want things explained to him.

And nobody I ever saw had any facts to dispute what he said. That includes professors who gleam themselves "experts".

 

[OODA_Loop]

What exactly do you mean by "offing?"

Traveling to Canada for the long deep night. Trudeau is waiting - open arms

 

[Marener]

And nobody I ever saw had any facts to dispute what he said. That includes professors who gleam themselves "experts".

Easy to say when you’re a fundamentalist who is closed off to any facts that don’t fit your narrative.

 

[WEATHER53]

Not much of an argument there, just a flat denial with no substantiation.

Prove me wrong.

A word salad non rebuttal. You proved you own self wrong. I did not need to

 

[Marener]

A word salad non rebuttal. You proved you own self wrong. I did not need to

I’m sorry but I thought we could have a legitimate conversation and debate but I guess that’s not possible.

 

[WEATHER53]

I’m sorry but I thought we could have a legitimate conversation and debate but I guess that’s not possible.

Proved his own self wrong but far too stupid snd overwrought to figure it out
Now add your usual question-“what do you mean…explain this further ”

 

[Marener]

Proved his own self wrong but far too stupid snd overwrought to figure it out
Now add your usual question-“what do you mean…explain this further ”

Imagine being triggered by asking you to substantiate your own argument.

That’s not how legitimate adult debate occurs.

Do you think Charlie Kirk should have been attacked for asking people to substantiate their argument?

 

[Lisa558]

What vile terms?

All she did was accurately report what Charlie said and stood for.

People are now getting fired for simply quoting Charlie's words.

That's how much of a scumbag he was, that if you just quote his own words, after his death, that gets you canceled.

What a ******* world we live in.

If you read the article, you’d see she made broad, sweeping negative remarks about white men in general.

 

[Lisa558]

Proved his own self wrong but far too stupid snd overwrought to figure it out
Now add your usual question-“what do you mean…explain this further ”

That’s another sneaky way lefties debate: they send you down a rabbit hole.

Her racist remarks about white men are right there in her article. If a white made similar remarks about black men, the lefties would be the first to recognize the racism.

 

[Marener]

If you read the article, you’d see she made broad, sweeping negative remarks about white men in general.

What did she say exactly?

I find it odd you don’t want to discuss her words.

 

[Concerned American]

Easy to say when you’re a fundamentalist who is closed off to any facts that don’t fit your narrative.

Pot meet Kettle. Your hypocrisy is raising it's ugly head again, moron-er

 

[Darkwind]

Easy to say when you’re a fundamentalist who is closed off to any facts that don’t fit your narrative.

However, enough about you and the left.

 

[Lisa558]

What did she say exactly?

I find it odd you don’t want to discuss her words.

It’s right in the article! Are you so blind to anti-white racism you don’t see it?

 

[Marener]

It’s right in the article! Are you so blind to anti-white racism you don’t see it?

So you’re going to scream she’s racist without being willing to identify what she said that is racist?

Funny how you were accusing the left of doing that very thing a few days ago. Quite ironic that you’re exactly what you complain about.

 

[Concerned American]

Quite ironic that you’re exactly what you complain about.

Projecting again moron-er

 

[MarcATL]

Traveling to Canada for the long deep night. Trudeau is waiting - open arms

Okay, well keep waiting.

 

[Lisa558]

So you’re going to scream she’s racist without being willing to identify what she said that is racist?

Funny how you were accusing the left of doing that very thing a few days ago. Quite ironic that you’re exactly what you complain about.

It’s the sentence that goes “Part of the what keeps America so violent is that people insist on [tolerance] for white men who espouse hatred and violence.”

What if someone wrote: Part of the reason our cities are so violent is because people insist on [tolerance] for black men who beat up innocent victims, scare people in subways, and steal cars.”

 

[MarcATL]

If you read the article, you’d see she made broad, sweeping negative remarks about white men in general.

Such as what?

You read it, right?

So you can share.

 

[Marener]

It’s the sentence that goes “Part of the what keeps America so violent is that people insist on [tolerance] for white men who espouse hatred and violence.”

Thank you. This in no way resembles your statement that she made broad negative generalizations about white men.

 

[Lisa558]

Thank you. This in no way resembles your statement that she made broad negative generalizations about white men.

Sure it does, and it’s a lie: white men do not espouse violence.

That would be YOUR side, with the Summer of Love as a prime example.