Racist WaPo Columnist fired for spewing venom against white men

She was fired for telling the truth.

The cancel culture party is up to their usual antics again, this time on steroids.
No, she was fired for her very hateful article about white men.

You wouldn’t be so tolerant if a white WaPo columnist wrote about black men with such vile terms.
 
What exactly did she say that was racist?

I heard we aren’t supposed to call people racist without actual proof because that means you’re inciting violence against them.
If you read the article that is contained in the OP, you’d know.

Just switch out the terms and use “black men” and “a black man” instead of “white men” and “a white man” - and tell me you wouldn’t consider it racist.
 
If you read the article that is contained in the OP, you’d know.

Just switch out the terms and use “black men” and “a black man” instead of “white men” and “a white man” - and tell me you wouldn’t consider it racist.

What do you consider racist about it?
 
No, she was fired for her very hateful article about white men.

You wouldn’t be so tolerant if a white WaPo columnist wrote about black men with such vile terms.
What vile terms?

All she did was accurately report what Charlie said and stood for.

People are now getting fired for simply quoting Charlie's words.

That's how much of a scumbag he was, that if you just quote his own words, after his death, that gets you canceled.

What a ******* world we live in.
 
What vile terms?

All she did was accurately report what Charlie said and stood for.

People are now getting fired for simply quoting Charlie's words.

That's how much of a scumbag he was, that if you just quote his own words, after his death, that gets you canceled.

What a ******* world we live in.

You and your entire ilk/cult are the scumbags. Most Americans are aware of this.
 
I was looking at this article, she wasn't fired because she was Black, she wasn't fired because
she's a skirt, and she wasn't fired because of her age.
She worked for a private company, and her mouth had her removed. She has nothing
to defend her being canned. I am assuming that she is a 'her'.
Libs offer they are not responsible for what they say or do. They say others drive them to it and it’s others fault. Its their unintended admissions that they are solely driven by Feelings. Thought does not occur with them,
 
What exactly did she say that was racist?

I heard we aren’t supposed to call people racist without actual proof because that means you’re inciting violence against them.
We won’t do your reading for you. Fake.!
 
What vile terms?

All she did was accurately report what Charlie said and stood for.

People are now getting fired for simply quoting Charlie's words.

That's how much of a scumbag he was, that if you just quote his own words, after his death, that gets you canceled.

What a ******* world we live in.
Do you feel all warm inside that your precious N is restricted and protected speech here? Denial of free speech and pandering and actually encouragement for you all to speak and behave like mad baboons.
 
You’re not engaging in honest, civil debate if you can’t defend your own position.
Being the incessant liars they are, they never engage in honest, or civil debate.
 
You’re not engaging in honest, civil debate if you can’t defend your own position.
You pretend you want things explained to you. Go somewhere where your comprehension ability does not necessitate that
 
You pretend you want things explained to you. Go somewhere where your comprehension ability does not necessitate that

Isn’t that the essence of Charlie Kirk’s campus tours?

He sits there beneath a banner that says “prove me wrong”, pretending to want things explained to him.
 
Thinkers
Which is worse ?
Calling Ni@@er or calling for celebration of murder?
It’s easy for me but a real problem for demented lib loons
 
15th post
Isn’t that the essence of Charlie Kirk’s campus tours?

He sits there beneath a banner that says “prove me wrong”, pretending to want things explained to him.
Nothing to do with his discussion tours that your ilk felt was influencing too many young voters.
 
Being the incessant liars they are, they never engage in honest, or civil debate.

That is exactly what Charlie did and one of your nuts killed him for it.

Face it, Democratic polices are void of logic and are juxtaposed to what made American the greatest country on the planet. Instead of lashing out when faced with facts that contradict your teachings, why not just wise up accept that you have been fed a load of garbage?
 
Nothing to do with his discussion tours that your ilk felt was influencing too many young voters.

Not much of an argument there, just a flat denial with no substantiation.

Prove me wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom