No coincidence that whites here won't mention this.
Holden Matthews Arrested in String of Louisiana Church Fires
Holden Matthews has been arrested in connection with fires that destroyed three Louisiana churches in the span of two weeks, local news outlet KATC reports.
Matthews, 21, is the son of a St. Landry Parish sheriff’s deputy, and he was booked in to St. Landry Parish jail at about 5:30 Wednesday evening. (His family declined to comment to The Daily Beast.) Louisiana authorities will hold a press conference at 10 a.m. local time.
Holden Matthews Arrested in String of Louisiana Church Fires
"It's all made up by democrats to keep blacks voting democrat."
If they had been historically white churches your Norway stretch would have had more credibility.
But they weren't. He chose all black churches. Does this "black metal" have something to do with blacks or black churches? I'm guessing it does not, given your analogy of peanut butter and chocolate.
And how is a report of an arson arrest "propaganda"? Seems to me trying to stretch out to Nosebook associations and Norfuckingway is far more propagandist than simply reporting the facts.
If he wasn't OBVIOUSLY a fan of black metal then yes, linking his arsons to the notorious Varg Vikernes would be a stretch. As it stands, the connection is a fucking no-brainer which the media will no doubt downplay.
If they had been historically white churches your Norway stretch would have had more credibility.
But they weren't. He chose all black churches. Does this "black metal" have something to do with blacks or black churches? I'm guessing it does not, given your analogy of peanut butter and chocolate.
And how is a report of an arson arrest "propaganda"? Seems to me trying to stretch out to Nosebook associations and Norfuckingway is far more propagandist than simply reporting the facts.
If he wasn't OBVIOUSLY a fan of black metal then yes, linking his arsons to the notorious Varg Vikernes would be a stretch. As it stands, the connection is a fucking no-brainer which the media will no doubt downplay.
So you're going with the propaganda stretch over the facts, even if it requires peanut butter with chocolate.
Here's the thing: you don't get to plug in connections for some perp that the perp didn't make himself.
If they had been historically white churches your Norway stretch would have had more credibility.
But they weren't. He chose all black churches. Does this "black metal" have something to do with blacks or black churches? I'm guessing it does not, given your analogy of peanut butter and chocolate.
And how is a report of an arson arrest "propaganda"? Seems to me trying to stretch out to Nosebook associations and Norfuckingway is far more propagandist than simply reporting the facts.
If he wasn't OBVIOUSLY a fan of black metal then yes, linking his arsons to the notorious Varg Vikernes would be a stretch. As it stands, the connection is a fucking no-brainer which the media will no doubt downplay.
So you're going with the propaganda stretch over the facts, even if it requires peanut butter with chocolate.
Here's the thing: you don't get to plug in connections for some perp that the perp didn't make himself.
I reserve the right to make logical assumptions. Edgy black metal kids have been vandalizing churches and shit for a few decades now. More than likely, he had no idea about the church demographics, unless he visited them himself which seems unlikely.
If they had been historically white churches your Norway stretch would have had more credibility.
But they weren't. He chose all black churches. Does this "black metal" have something to do with blacks or black churches? I'm guessing it does not, given your analogy of peanut butter and chocolate.
And how is a report of an arson arrest "propaganda"? Seems to me trying to stretch out to Nosebook associations and Norfuckingway is far more propagandist than simply reporting the facts.
If he wasn't OBVIOUSLY a fan of black metal then yes, linking his arsons to the notorious Varg Vikernes would be a stretch. As it stands, the connection is a fucking no-brainer which the media will no doubt downplay.
So you're going with the propaganda stretch over the facts, even if it requires peanut butter with chocolate.
Here's the thing: you don't get to plug in connections for some perp that the perp didn't make himself.
I reserve the right to make logical assumptions. Edgy black metal kids have been vandalizing churches and shit for a few decades now. More than likely, he had no idea about the church demographics, unless he visited them himself which seems unlikely.
I uh, don't think one would need to wait for a Sunday and physically visit a church to know if it's historically black, especially with this Al Gore thing called the internets. So you're saying it's just coincidence that each one was a black church, yet the tenuous association with some fringe Norwegian guy is to be taken as no pun intended, gospel?
You may be right that some obscure "black metal" church burning thing exists in Norway --- where the congregations are presumably white by default ---- and dates all the way back to the 1990s, but the burning of black churches as an intimidation tactic in the South goes back just about two hundred years.
Neither of those amounts to evidence of causation but one is more glaring than the other.
On the contrary, I immediately noted that the title makes no sense. Can you read?
Then there's his closing line:
""It's all made up by democrats [sic] to keep blacks voting democrat [sic]."
Again --- makes no sense.
Not to mention his opening line --- "whites won't mention" a story that he himself just put up for the first time. OP must be a mongoloid idiot.
If they had been historically white churches your Norway stretch would have had more credibility.
But they weren't. He chose all black churches. Does this "black metal" have something to do with blacks or black churches? I'm guessing it does not, given your analogy of peanut butter and chocolate.
And how is a report of an arson arrest "propaganda"? Seems to me trying to stretch out to Nosebook associations and Norfuckingway is far more propagandist than simply reporting the facts.
If he wasn't OBVIOUSLY a fan of black metal then yes, linking his arsons to the notorious Varg Vikernes would be a stretch. As it stands, the connection is a fucking no-brainer which the media will no doubt downplay.
So you're going with the propaganda stretch over the facts, even if it requires peanut butter with chocolate.
Here's the thing: you don't get to plug in connections for some perp that the perp didn't make himself.
I reserve the right to make logical assumptions. Edgy black metal kids have been vandalizing churches and shit for a few decades now. More than likely, he had no idea about the church demographics, unless he visited them himself which seems unlikely.
I uh, don't think one would need to wait for a Sunday and physically visit a church to know if it's historically black, especially with this Al Gore thing called the internets. So you're saying it's just coincidence that each one was a black church, yet the tenuous association with some fringe Norwegian guy is to be taken as no pun intended, gospel?
You may be right that some obscure "black metal" church burning thing exists in Norway --- where the congregations are presumably white by default ---- and dates all the way back to the 1990s, but the burning of black churches as an intimidation tactic in the South goes back just about two hundred years.
Neither of those amounts to evidence of causation but one is more glaring than the other.
The black clothes, long hair, Mjolnir pendant, and his being in a black metal band is no "tenuous association". It's a blatant red flag, he might as well get "I burn churches for satan" tattooed on his forehead. black metal edgelord personified.
