Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
Racheal is the best informed, most comprehensive and smartest broadcast personality on TV.
Racheal Maddow
- Thread starter Wry Catcher
- Start date
WillowTree
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2008
- 84,532
- 16,101
- 2,180
driveby
Gold Member
- Sep 6, 2008
- 8,848
- 2,339
- 183
Oddball
Unobtanium Member
...and pro rasslin' is the last true and untainted sport. 
Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,102
- 245
You spend way too much time watching Glenn Beck.
Tom Clancy
Clancy for Ron Paul
See now, this is the point where I can't stand Liberals..
They complain and complain about how Glenn Beck and Hannity are the worst people ever but then come around out of nowhere saying Maddow and Olbermann are the most informed anchors around..
Hypocrites..
xsited1
Agent P
He really is a great broadcast personality. I like how he questions his guests. Outstanding!
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #8
Ah yes, the willfully ignorant speak, all with one voice. Almost as if they echo each other. Independent thinkers, I think not.
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 27
By Chris Ariens on May 28, 2010 04:45 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)
Total day: FNC: 395 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129
Prime: FNC: 700 | CNN: 246 | MSNBC: 239 | HLN: 225
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
503 343 428 873 629 596 531
CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: KingUSA: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
283 280 221 237 222 280 246
MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:
142 131 163 296 217 203 185
HLN Showbiz: Prime: Issues: Grace: Behar: Grace: Showbiz:
48 50 164 341 127 226 152
C'mon..........this is a joke right??? Look at the Maddow # ( highlighted in red)........and this is in the 25-54 demographic, so total rating is even going to be lower. The show barely has 1 million viewers/night and many nights falls under that and it is estimated that a vast majority of those viewers are committed liberal viewers. So........in other words..............
Nobody watches that show!!!!!
By Chris Ariens on May 28, 2010 04:45 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)
Total day: FNC: 395 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129
Prime: FNC: 700 | CNN: 246 | MSNBC: 239 | HLN: 225
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
503 343 428 873 629 596 531
CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: KingUSA: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
283 280 221 237 222 280 246
MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:
142 131 163 296 217 203 185
HLN Showbiz: Prime: Issues: Grace: Behar: Grace: Showbiz:
48 50 164 341 127 226 152
C'mon..........this is a joke right??? Look at the Maddow # ( highlighted in red)........and this is in the 25-54 demographic, so total rating is even going to be lower. The show barely has 1 million viewers/night and many nights falls under that and it is estimated that a vast majority of those viewers are committed liberal viewers. So........in other words..............
Nobody watches that show!!!!!
- Banned
- #10
The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 27
By Chris Ariens on May 28, 2010 04:45 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)
Total day: FNC: 395 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129
Prime: FNC: 700 | CNN: 246 | MSNBC: 239 | HLN: 225
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
503 343 428 873 629 596 531
CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: KingUSA: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
283 280 221 237 222 280 246
MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:
142 131 163 296 217 203 185
HLN Showbiz: Prime: Issues: Grace: Behar: Grace: Showbiz:
48 50 164 341 127 226 152
C'mon..........this is a joke right??? Look at the Maddow # ( highlighted in red)........and this is in the 25-54 demographic, so total rating is even going to be lower. The show barely has 1 million viewers/night and many nights falls under that and it is estimated that a vast majority of those viewers are committed liberal viewers. So........in other words..............
Nobody watches that show!!!!!
and do you honestly believe that ratings have any sort of direct correlation with the intelligence of the host?
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 27
By Chris Ariens on May 28, 2010 04:45 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)
Total day: FNC: 395 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129
Prime: FNC: 700 | CNN: 246 | MSNBC: 239 | HLN: 225
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
503 343 428 873 629 596 531
CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: KingUSA: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
283 280 221 237 222 280 246
MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:
142 131 163 296 217 203 185
HLN Showbiz: Prime: Issues: Grace: Behar: Grace: Showbiz:
48 50 164 341 127 226 152
C'mon..........this is a joke right??? Look at the Maddow # ( highlighted in red)........and this is in the 25-54 demographic, so total rating is even going to be lower. The show barely has 1 million viewers/night and many nights falls under that and it is estimated that a vast majority of those viewers are committed liberal viewers. So........in other words..............
Nobody watches that show!!!!!
and do you honestly believe that ratings have any sort of direct correlation with the intelligence of the host?
and irrelevant post................
California Girl
Rookie
- Oct 8, 2009
- 50,337
- 10,059
- 0
- Banned
- #13
You are entitled to your opinion - no matter how little evidence there is to support it. I respect your view.
Mad Scientist
Feels Good!
- Sep 15, 2008
- 24,196
- 5,434
- 270
Yes. That guy, Rachel Madnow, though well educated, has no clue how to get people, liberal or conservative to watch her show. Buy hey, MSNBC has no clue how to get people to watch their entire network either.
Her only defense would be that someone else is pulling the strings on her show. Maybe she could flash her tits or something.
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
YIKES..............no thanks. Her face is hideous enough!!
But I suspect that if she did, you'd know why shes such an uber-feminist!!del
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #17
i watch her occasionally. she's very bright, although calling her the best informed really isn't saying much. she's honest within the context of her biases, but sometimes comes across to me as smarmy. she's certainly lightyears better than olbermann, matthews, and oreilly. i've never watched beck except on clips here, posted by his supporters. as far as i can tell, he's an even bigger asshat than the rest of them.
bodecea
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #18
The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 27
By Chris Ariens on May 28, 2010 04:45 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)
Total day: FNC: 395 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129
Prime: FNC: 700 | CNN: 246 | MSNBC: 239 | HLN: 225
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
503 343 428 873 629 596 531
CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: KingUSA: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
283 280 221 237 222 280 246
MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:
142 131 163 296 217 203 185
HLN Showbiz: Prime: Issues: Grace: Behar: Grace: Showbiz:
48 50 164 341 127 226 152
C'mon..........this is a joke right??? Look at the Maddow # ( highlighted in red)........and this is in the 25-54 demographic, so total rating is even going to be lower. The show barely has 1 million viewers/night and many nights falls under that and it is estimated that a vast majority of those viewers are committed liberal viewers. So........in other words..............
Nobody watches that show!!!!!
and do you honestly believe that ratings have any sort of direct correlation with the intelligence of the host?
Usually, it's an inverse correlation.
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #19
Obviously the willfully ignorant have not and will not watch anything which might cause them discomfort - avoiding cognitive dissonance seems to be a common factor in their belief system, and why they hold so firmly to the talking points of the right.
WillowTree
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2008
- 84,532
- 16,101
- 2,180
I don't know so much about Beck. He can only be tolerated by me in small doses. You are very wrong about O'Reilly. He actually puts his money where is mouth is. You know he was instrumental in getting OJ's stupid book "Why I Did it" shit canned. You know he was instrumental in getting Jessica's law passed don't you. He doesn't just sit there and bitch and talk. He actively works to improve this country. You do know that he has a site that sells merchandise? Every penny goes to charity. You do know he has a wounded warrior program. Raises thousands upon thousands of dollars for our wounded vets. And last but not least.. he took on Bawney Fwank and called him out for the dirty scoundrel he is and was in re to Fannie and Freddie.
Similar threads
