Yarddog
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2014
- 17,507
- 11,784
- 1,255
Well I can tell the odds are they never got it. More likely they have the aggressive gene. History will bear me out. White people excelled at making weapons of war.Race Evolution Behavior abidged version J. Philippe Rushton Free Download Streaming Internet Archive
The left says "racism" and lack of government spending are what make non-whites poor and violent.
The right says "lack of family values" are what make non-whites poor and violent.
Neither are correct.
NATURE is what makes non-whites poor and violent.
Ey, did anyone have an answer for what year whites got the passive gene or whatever we are applauding?
Come one guys. Someone has to have an answer. Perhaps this thread is about something else?
I agree white people have a history of making war weapons as well as more advanced technology but there is a reason for this other than genetics i believe.
Ive thought about this and I think in the case of westerrn Europe for example, consider living there during the Ice ages ... and even without that, you had less land available with less resources for the people who lived there In comparison to the continent of Africa. They had to learn to cross bodies of water very efficiently and they lived in a cold climate. this forced them to develop technology quickly. During the Ice ages in many instaances they were probably facing starvation, they had to learn to build ships and eventually ships that could fiight or defend, develop tools to do all this. develop walls and castles to keep out invaders
Then if you look at Africa, there was really no need to do any of this for the most part because they had the most resources available to anyone at the time.. All they really needed to do was be a real efficient hunter or farmer and life was good . Who can blame them for that? Im not saying this of All Africa but its true in very large areas. Egypt is an anomaly to that, but then again look... you have a river system society where goods can be transported over water.
Russians by the way are the descendants of the vikings who conquered their way inland up the river systems maybe has something to do with their warlike tendencies.
The book link I posted earlier at the beginning of this thread pretty much agrees with your theory. However, it is genetic because it continues to this day. Egypt was not an anomaly. It was the culmination of the Black civilization that inhabited the Sahara before it dried up. There are finds that have discovered water craft that transported goods in Africa where ever there is a water way.
Well I can tell the odds are they never got it. More likely they have the aggressive gene. History will bear me out. White people excelled at making weapons of war.Race Evolution Behavior abidged version J. Philippe Rushton Free Download Streaming Internet Archive
The left says "racism" and lack of government spending are what make non-whites poor and violent.
The right says "lack of family values" are what make non-whites poor and violent.
Neither are correct.
NATURE is what makes non-whites poor and violent.
Ey, did anyone have an answer for what year whites got the passive gene or whatever we are applauding?
Come one guys. Someone has to have an answer. Perhaps this thread is about something else?
I agree white people have a history of making war weapons as well as more advanced technology but there is a reason for this other than genetics i believe.
Ive thought about this and I think in the case of westerrn Europe for example, consider living there during the Ice ages ... and even without that, you had less land available with less resources for the people who lived there In comparison to the continent of Africa. They had to learn to cross bodies of water very efficiently and they lived in a cold climate. this forced them to develop technology quickly. During the Ice ages in many instaances they were probably facing starvation, they had to learn to build ships and eventually ships that could fiight or defend, develop tools to do all this. develop walls and castles to keep out invaders
Then if you look at Africa, there was really no need to do any of this for the most part because they had the most resources available to anyone at the time.. All they really needed to do was be a real efficient hunter or farmer and life was good . Who can blame them for that? Im not saying this of All Africa but its true in very large areas. Egypt is an anomaly to that, but then again look... you have a river system society where goods can be transported over water.
Russians by the way are the descendants of the vikings who conquered their way inland up the river systems maybe has something to do with their warlike tendencies.
The book link I posted earlier at the beginning of this thread pretty much agrees with your theory. However, it is genetic because it continues to this day. Egypt was not an anomaly. It was the culmination of the Black civilization that inhabited the Sahara before it dried up. There are finds that have discovered water craft that transported goods in Africa where ever there is a water way.
looks like it might be a good book to pick up. this is a complicated subject because the world is in constant flux, Im gone for the rest of the day, ill check out the thread when im back