- Dec 29, 2008
- 36,335
- 19,222
- 1,905
I just want to make sure I have this straight.
White guy trying to prove whites are superior makes up a test. This test totally ignores the concept of impartiality by the results of the test being based on a unagreeded upon concept of what intelligence actually is. It ignores any mental impediments such as anger, anxiety, or confidence. It ignores relevance or the reward factor for doing good on this test. It ignores that people that have scored low on this test have been wildly successful.
Now a obviously lowbrow white guy latches onto the results of these tests and breaks the first rule of intelligent thinking. Correlation does not equal causation. Not to forget we are operating in a playground of this madman's choosing and definition. Psychotic white guy then combines genetics with this information and declares that some "races" are inferior. When you point out to him that he is pretty stupid himself and blatant proof that he missed the intelligent gene (or the many combination of genes and factors he is unaware of) he wants you to pretend that is not important. When you point out there are people in the very "race" he claims is inferior that can lap him in any intelligent endeavor he calls unfair posting especially if it includes visuals. Again lest we forget we are operating in a world of his choosing this whole time. Now if i can prove his theory is stupid in his world, why does he think he can prove it holds any water in the real world? Did I miss anything here?
No one cares about your opinion, and even if they did, they wouldn't take it seriously.