Why is it that Americans will bend over backwards to appease the Islam country's? Why is that we must walk around such issues like the 9/11 Mosque, and the Florida QurÂ’an bonfire? Is it from fear of an attack from a peaceful religion, It's a known fact they have killed Americans before without any provocation in the past. Like some of these attacks from the following link.
In your first question, I'm not sure whether you're referring to US Foreign Policy with respect to Islamic nations or sentiments of the American citizenry towards Muslims here and abroad, although I suspect you're focus is on the latter.
I don't see how anyone is "bending over backwards" to appease Muslims in this country. 'Appeasment' carrys the conotation of yielding to maintain peace at the expense of principles or justice. What American principles are being sacrficed by opposing a book burning event that is offensive and inflammatory by design, or by not opposing the building of a religious facility in Lower Manhattan? From a political perspective, neither can be legitimately rejected, since both actions are constitutionally protected by the 1st Amendment (albeit an argument
COULD be made that the Qur'an burning is a form of hate speech, although I doubt it would hold much water legally, but I digress...).
However, from a social, religious, or ideological perspective, there is a great deal of opposition to and support for the Mosque, resulting in a very heated national discussion, while a rather insignificant, yet extremely vocal, support for the Qu'ran burning amidst a sea of opposition. In the former instance, most supporters (of which I am one) argue that members of a Muslim congregation have the right to build a Mosque in a place of their choosing, and reject the emotional and irrational protests of those against its construction. First, the whole "hallowed ground" argument is nonsense, aside from the fact that it isn't on "ground zero", would the same line of thinking apply to a Baptists that proposed building a church on the ground? Surely not. Second, the "insensitive to the families of 9/11 victims" is equally nonsensical. Not one of those congregation members were in any way involved with the terrorist attacks on 9/11, nor is there any reason to suspect any one of them praised the attacks or otherwise supported them. Therefore, both arguments are necessarily discriminatory towards Muslims simply for being Muslim, which is a direct violation of one of our sacred American principles: "All men are created equal". It has nothing to do with being afraid of further violence or appeasing anyone; it's about fundamental values.
The book burning was pure demagoguery and had the sole intention of inflamming Muslims, the message being "this is what we think of Muslims". That isn't illegal, and nor should it be - and the church should not be prohibited by government from conducting its ridiculous exercise in religious divisiveness, and exhibiting the true stupidity of its congregation and members. Attitudes of intolerance, whether due to blindness or imagined threat, are nothing new to the US and examples go back to the founding. Nevertheless, such intolerance is NOT an inherent part of who we are as Americans. We have no common ancestry to define us, or universal religion, or language, or culture. We are a nation of many different peoples, all bringing their own religions, speaking their own languages, and creating a myriad dissimilar and even conflicting cultures. Nevertheless, we are one nation, bound together by a shared philosophy:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
It has nothing to do with fear or appeasement. It's about our national identity, the fundamental principles that define us; and defending our American philosophy.
E pluribus unum.