Question for those on the Left who constantly speak of Israeli Genocide against Gazans

One wonders what body could persuade the holocaust deniers to accept reality.

I reckon if Nutty came out and confessed to all they'd say the context was inappropriate.
 
One wonders what body could persuade the holocaust deniers to accept reality.
No "body" will convince. Evidence will convince us. Appeal to authority or appeal to popularity are just logical fallacies. Atrocities happen because people follow authority or popularity rather than following sound moral core values and evidence.

Distinctive definitions of war vs. genocide would be the place to start. These definitions and parameters already exist. People just don't seem to be able to apply these parameters to Israel.
 
There is no evidence

Israel is using other methods as well as starvation and thirst in its UN panel determined genocide. Obviously because it wants to.

No "body" will convince. Evidence will convince us


We're continually being told no evidence is good enough when 124 countries (literally the world) agrees on evidence presented to them

but this is just in the USofA..... because of AIPAC.... which Congress just disenfranchised......they can no longer hide foreign policy behind bigotry

Greater Israel , and their zionist policies to achieve it being one of them

Further still, we (the USofA) are the only viable ally Israel has , they'll simply cease to exist w/out us , and are surrounded by a world of hands down insane mullahs(evident to anyone who can read a map) that are all about exterminating every last of of them

AGREED???

When our president (or any US POTUS) tells them to back off......and Bibi refuses, his total lack of respect , ingratitude ,allegiance ...... and yes bigotry is a tad hard to swallow

AGREED????;)

He needs to go, even his own people want him and his rabid right Likud party out......

~S~
 
We're continually being told no evidence is good enough when 124 countries (literally the world) agrees on evidence presented to them.
Wait, what? Was there a trial held before 124 countries that I am not aware of? Wherein all 124 countries had representatives who collectively heard the arguments from both sides, evaluated the evidence, and made a determination that Israel is indeed guilty of the crime of genocide? Link, please.
 
We're continually being told no evidence is good enough
So far, the evidence is not good enough. That a child has a gunshot wound is NOT EVIDENCE of anything except that the child suffered a gunshot wound. The gunshot wound alone is not evidence to know the circumstances of the shooting, to identify the shooter, and especially not to determine the intent of the shooter at the time of the shooting. You can't convict people based on assumptions. You need evidence.

The charge is that the IDF has the intent to exterminate the people of Gaza. It is a heavy charge demanding much more than simply the fact that children were harmed in combat in urban warfare. This is especially true when there is significant evidence of mitigation of harm, especially to children.
 
Back
Top Bottom