Question for "objective" right-wingers.....

[Procrustes Stretched]

and one that insinuates President Bush orchestrated 9/11

who insinuates that?

 

[OKTexas]

I don't know, perhaps those that testified before the 9-11 committee were more forthcoming?

Or the executive branch didn't take years to release subpoenaed information.

Uhm, yes they did...for 4 years

The crux of the issue is a January 25, 2001, memo on al-Qaeda from counterterrorism coordinator Richard Clarke to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, the first terrorism strategy paper of the Bush administration. The document was central to the debate over pre-9/11 Bush administration policy on terrorism and figured prominently in the 9/11 hearings held in 2004. A declassified copy of the Clarke memo was first posted on the Web by the National Security Archive in February 2005. Bush Administration's First Memo on al-Qaeda Declassified

Let's break this down, hearing held in 2004, document released in early 2005, I'd say that's less than a year. But what do I know, you're the math wizard. LMAO

BTW all the hildabeast emails still haven't been released.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

I don't know, perhaps those that testified before the 9-11 committee were more forthcoming?

Or the executive branch didn't take years to release subpoenaed information.

Uhm, yes they did...for 4 years

The crux of the issue is a January 25, 2001, memo on al-Qaeda from counterterrorism coordinator Richard Clarke to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, the first terrorism strategy paper of the Bush administration. The document was central to the debate over pre-9/11 Bush administration policy on terrorism and figured prominently in the 9/11 hearings held in 2004. A declassified copy of the Clarke memo was first posted on the Web by the National Security Archive in February 2005. Bush Administration's First Memo on al-Qaeda Declassified

Let's break this down, hearing held in 2004, document released in early 2005, I'd say that's less than a year. But what do I know, you're the math wizard. LMAO

BTW all the hildabeast emails still haven't been released.

Truth hidden since 2001
Dante understands all the national security concerns, but some in the Bush/Cheney admin helped feed the myth that Clinton was to blame for 9/11

 

[OKTexas]

I don't know, perhaps those that testified before the 9-11 committee were more forthcoming?

Or the executive branch didn't take years to release subpoenaed information.

Uhm, yes they did...for 4 years

The crux of the issue is a January 25, 2001, memo on al-Qaeda from counterterrorism coordinator Richard Clarke to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, the first terrorism strategy paper of the Bush administration. The document was central to the debate over pre-9/11 Bush administration policy on terrorism and figured prominently in the 9/11 hearings held in 2004. A declassified copy of the Clarke memo was first posted on the Web by the National Security Archive in February 2005. Bush Administration's First Memo on al-Qaeda Declassified

Let's break this down, hearing held in 2004, document released in early 2005, I'd say that's less than a year. But what do I know, you're the math wizard. LMAO

BTW all the hildabeast emails still haven't been released.

Truth hidden since 2001
Dante understands all the national security concerns, but some in the Bush/Cheney admin helped feed the myth that Clinton was to blame for 9/11

It's really simple, Clinton built the firewall between the intel agencies that kept them form connecting the dots. In the early months of the Bush administration all they had was a bunch of disjointed information, who would you blame?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

It's really simple, Clinton built the firewall between the intel agencies that kept them form connecting the dots. In the early months of the Bush administration all they had was a bunch of disjointed information, who would you blame?

What does that have to do with ignoring Clarke?

and why the deflection?

 

[Tehon]

It's really simple, Clinton built the firewall between the intel agencies that kept them form connecting the dots. In the early months of the Bush administration all they had was a bunch of disjointed information, who would you blame?

Everything you conservatives are spoon fed from the likes of Limbaugh is kept real simple. Keep it simple and the message will reverberate. And none of you it seems has the intellectual honesty to question anything you hear. Despite what you believe, Clinton didn't build a firewall between intel agencies. The Gorelick memo, which you will next submit as proof of your beliefs, is not a smoking gun. It did not prevent the alphabet agencies from sharing national security intel.

 

[nat4900]

Citing a leftist website which has "real liberal politics" in its name

If that website was spouting an OPINION, I'd agree......But, the website was simply CITING the transcript of what Jeb stated on CNN.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Citing a leftist website which has "real liberal politics" in its name

If that website was spouting an OPINION, I'd agree......But, the website was simply CITING the transcript of what Jeb stated on CNN.

Lol. Nice try, but no.

 

[Iceweasel]

Any loss of American lives is a tragedy......

That stated, it should raise some skepticism in any objective mind as the WHY it has taken the Benghazi select committee, about 2 additional months (and they're still going strong in their so-called investigation) to find out more about the loss of 4 American live.......than it took the 9-11 commission to investigate the loss of almost 3,000 American lives......???

Well, they just had Hillary's secretary testify so for someone sober it would indicate they didn't have all the facts and still don't. The Dems stonewall and blame Republicans for the cost.

There's nothing objective about the left, they lie and obfuscate about everything.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

George Bush was in office barely 8 months when America was attacked on 9/11/2001. Bill Clinton was using American planes to attack civilians in a defenseless European country while the same terrorists that he dismissed in the first attack on the World Trade center were attending flight school under his freaking nose. Clinton's idiot Attorney General even issued an order that prevented the FBI from sharing information with the CIA under threat of arrest and imprisonment. If President Bush made any errors it was not firing every dumb assed political appointee in the Clinton administration but he thought he would be a nice guy and keep the idiots on.

So, your conclusion is that 9-11 was all Clinton's fault.......Interesting.

I dont get that from what he posted.
Both Clinton and Bush ignored the facts that they had to indicate an attack would happen.
Clinton however should have been at least curious why muslims were learning to fly but not interested in how to land.

 

[Kosh]

Since there are no objective far left drones on this board, not sure why one is asking for anything dealing objectivity..

 

[Maryland Patriot]

It is interesting to note that in both the World Trade Center attack and in the Benghazi attack, there is only one common factor shared between the two of them.
that would be the name Clinton being involved in both. If not raising it, that should at least bring the flag to the pole for the average person.

 

[nat4900]

Citing a leftist website which has "real liberal politics" in its name

If that website was spouting an OPINION, I'd agree......But, the website was simply CITING the transcript of what Jeb stated on CNN.

Lol. Nice try, but no.

Its rather interesting that you're labeling whatever Jeb Bush actually STATES, as "leftist propaganda."...Who knows, you may be correct.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Bush left Clinton's intelligence people in place because he knew 9/11 was inevitable and wanted to make sure Dems had some skin in the game

 

[nat4900]

The Dems stonewall and blame Republicans for the cost.

The criticism for the "cost" has been rather minimal....However, the criticism for the soon to be TWO years of investigation, is a legitimate criticism that smacks of partisanship.

 

[nat4900]

Bush left Clinton's intelligence people in place because he knew 9/11 was inevitable and wanted to make sure Dems had some skin in the game

Even I would judge the above to be a bit too callous,

 

[Iceweasel]

The Dems stonewall and blame Republicans for the cost.

The criticism for the "cost" has been rather minimal....However, the criticism for the soon to be TWO years of investigation, is a legitimate criticism that smacks of partisanship.

True, the Democrats have stonewalled from day one. The president dropped the ball and blamed some poor schmuck for a movie no one saw in order to convince the public he had terrorism under control right before the election. That's an abuse of power and the kind of corruption we as a free people need to safeguard against. You expect the Democrats to investigate Democrat corruption?

 

[healthmyths]

George Bush was in office barely 8 months when America was attacked on 9/11/2001. Bill Clinton was using American planes to attack civilians in a defenseless European country while the same terrorists that he dismissed in the first attack on the World Trade center were attending flight school under his freaking nose. Clinton's idiot Attorney General even issued an order that prevented the FBI from sharing information with the CIA under threat of arrest and imprisonment. If President Bush made any errors it was not firing every dumb assed political appointee in the Clinton administration but he thought he would be a nice guy and keep the idiots on.

So, your conclusion is that 9-11 was all Clinton's fault.......Interesting.

It's actually a lie.

Maybe you should tell it to this guy.
By the way when you say something is a LIE maybe you'd be more believable if you substantiated your claim.
Here is the Gorelick Memo...
Gorelick Memo that created the wall between FBI & CIA thus no knowledge of the 9/11 bombers shared with the FBI!!!
looks especially imprudent 10 years later.
1995 memo she wrote, stated explicitly that they would “go beyond what is legally required, [to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation.” GORELICK WALL!
Here read what NOT my words but other sources:
Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall.
Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
So, a year before the 9/11 attacks, a special unit in the U.S. military was aware of the presence of an al-Queda cell in Brooklyn, New York, and sought to share its information with the FBI but was stopped cold.Why?Because (as described in the April 16, 2004 Washington Times piece) “on March 4, 1995, [Jamie Gorelick, the then number 2 official in the Clinton Justice Department, sent a 4-page directive] to FBI Director Louis Freeh and Mary Jo White, the New York-based U.S. attorney investigating the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
In the memo, Ms. Gorelick ordered Mr. Freeh and Ms. White to follow information-sharing procedures that ‘go beyond what is legally required,’ in order to avoid ‘any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance’ that the Justice Department was using Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants, instead of ordinary criminal investigative procedures, in an effort to undermine the civil liberties of terrorism suspects.”
Could 9/11 Have Been Prevented? The Gorelick Memo and What We Knew

There that easy to prove you are NOT believable and there was a legal obstacle.
Oh and the reason for the Gorelick Memo.

(CNSNews.com) - A senior U.S. government official has told CNSNews.com that the 1995 memo written by former Assistant Attorney General Jamie Gorelick and currently at issue in the 9/11 Commission's investigation of U.S. intelligence failures, also created "a roadblock" to the probe of the 1996 Clinton re-election campaign fundraising scandal.

The memo's relevance in the investigation of the fundraising scandal has received scant attention in the media, but four different sources, including the government official, have explained and corroborated details of the connection for CNSNews.com.

The CNSNews.com sources question whether the guidelines purportedly put in place by Gorelick in 1995 for Justice Department investigations were actually intended to shield President Bill Clinton, Vice President Al Gore and top Democratic campaign fundraisers from the subsequent congressional investigations of the illegal fundraising activities.

However, there appears to be no evidence at this point that the Gorelick memo was written for that express purpose.

Because the memo created a barrier for U.S. intelligence agencies to share information with the FBI, one of its unintended consequences may have been to prevent the FBI from receiving the necessary intelligence to stop the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the worst in American history.
Gorelick Memo Allegedly Impeded Probe of Clinton Fundraising Scandal

 

[Wildman]

So, your conclusion is that 9-11 was all Clinton's fault.......Interesting.

EXACTLY!! who else had control of the nation for the 8 years prior to the September 11, 2001AD, attack on America, Bubba approved the student visas for the terrorist to obtain flight training, denying theses facts makes one a foolish idiot.

 

[Wildman]

You're the one struggling with hypocrisy.

AND......

TRUTH!!