Question For Lefties, What Is Abortion?

Making the issue personal is exactly what your problem is.
When the Rubber Meets the Road

Except for birth control. Then the Protestant hypocrites are all pro-choice. They used to oppose contraception; they will soon give up on this Puritanical prohibitionist bossiness. When someone is having fun outside of singing praises to his own virtue in church, they are horrified.
 
Hofare

Exactly. Mandatory abortions for sluts who get pregnant only so they can get a paycheck the next 18 years. Or force the Christofascists to pay the nappy heads for us if they want to outlaw abortions.

If these frauds know how to bring up children, how come so many of their daughters and sons wind up with illegitimate children? Like Sarah Palin's choir girl leg-spreader.
They don’t have white trash baby mommas on meth in the holler???
 
Is that because analogies and metaphors are so much more significant than actual scientific facts are?

Is that why?

Take off your blinders and Gestalt the issue. Science is only one factor.
So, when actual science destroys the metaphor. . .

Your response is "Science is only one factor?"

How much Gestalting does one need to see the problem with that self PWNing response?

1761696249253.webp
 
So, when actual science destroys the metaphor. . .

Your response is "Science is only one factor?"

How much Gestalting does one need to see the problem with that self PWNing response?

View attachment 1178436
Punch yourself in the face all you want , it's not going to help you. Your Obsession needs to be treated by a professional.
 
Still the answer to the OP


Not your choice.
 
Punch yourself in the face all you want , it's not going to help you. Your Obsession needs to be treated by a professional.
That was alang1216 punching himself in the face.

Not me.

The difference between you and him (her?).

alang1216 is intellectually honest enough to admit the mistake.

At least I think he/ she is.
 
So, when actual science destroys the metaphor. . .

Your response is "Science is only one factor?"

How much Gestalting does one need to see the problem with that self PWNing response?

View attachment 1178436
I should have been more clear, and given prior written notice, that I was referring to biology since, I guess, psychology is a science. Of course values are moral, not scientific.
 
I should have been more clear, and given prior written notice, that I was referring to biology since, I guess, psychology is a science. Of course values are moral, not scientific.
Some moral values are immoral. Better to live your life based on ethics.
 
Some moral values are immoral TO YOU.
Moral values are subject to change and can easily go down a dark path justifying practically anything. Ethics are constant and not subject to people's whims and hatreds
 
Moral values are subject to change and can easily go down a dark path justifying practically anything. Ethics are constant and not subject to people's whims and hatreds
Ethics are constant and not subject to people's whims and hatreds ACCORDING TO YOU.

The statement that ethics are constant and not subject to whims and hatreds is a foundational principle of moral realism. It is, however, a topic of extensive philosophical debate. While many find comfort in the idea of stable moral truths, subjectivists and cultural relativists offer strong challenges by arguing that morality is rooted in individual feelings, cultural conventions, or is not based on facts at all. There is no simple resolution, and the question of whether ethics is constant or variable remains a core inquiry in philosophy
 
15th post
Ethics are constant and not subject to people's whims and hatreds ACCORDING TO YOU.

The statement that ethics are constant and not subject to whims and hatreds is a foundational principle of moral realism. It is, however, a topic of extensive philosophical debate. While many find comfort in the idea of stable moral truths, subjectivists and cultural relativists offer strong challenges by arguing that morality is rooted in individual feelings, cultural conventions, or is not based on facts at all. There is no simple resolution, and the question of whether ethics is constant or variable remains a core inquiry in philosophy
However , ethics never did or could never justify slavery , homophobia and much , much more. I'll stick with ethics.
 
However , ethics never did or could never justify slavery , homophobia and much , much more. I'll stick with ethics.
You don't think Thomas Jefferson, a slave owner, was an ethical man, just with different ethics than you have?

There are homophobic passages in the Bible. Do you think all believers are unethical?
 
You don't think Thomas Jefferson, a slave owner, was an ethical man, just with different ethics than you have?

There are homophobic passages in the Bible. Do you think all believers are unethical?
Only in those respects , not entirely. No one is perfect in this world , even Jesus had his flaws. He was HUMAN like the rest of US.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom