The paper is a joke.Check links to the authors of this information. They are from Thailand and China.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The paper is a joke.Check links to the authors of this information. They are from Thailand and China.
Some posters give off the appearance of actually understanding this. I am not among them. When claims are made the James Webb Space Telescope solved the questions contained in quantum physics, it brings out the skeptic in me.
That and the paper came to us from Thailand and China. Seems important physicists would be leaping up to embrace it were it true.
I do not have the education needed to raise invalid points.You raise valid points.
Do you have reference? This won't be the first theory to go down in flames.I do not have the education needed to raise invalid points.
I had checked with Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder first to see if she is in on this herself. She spent time debunking it.
Link sucks....Not enough original content for a legit OP....Best clean that up, dude.
Now, onto the topic....
The concept of time is three dimensional: Newtonian & Einsteinian...Quantum physics has no concept of time: it transcends what we can see, even with the most high tech instrument of measurment.
You might as well be trying to reconcile baseball with SCUBA diving.
You misunderstand. The planck length is itself a constant. Its expressed in meters, not "in other constants". Multiplying those constants you mentioned is how it is calculated. The article is stating that even those constants can be expressed using a combination of the two constants planck length and planck time.Planck length appears to be a circular definition:
Planck units are a system of units of measurementdefined exclusively in terms of four universal physical constants: c, G, ħ, and kB
See wiki.
If there are now TWO constants but one of those constants is measured in terms of FOUR constants, then the math no add up.
Your sense of humor is legendary.You misunderstand. The planck length is itself a constant. Multiplying those constants is how it is calculated. The article is stating that even those constants can be expressed using a combination of the two constants planck length and planck time.
" In recent years, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has observed several phenomena, including galaxies that had already existed 300 Myr after the big bang, which have never been thought to exist [1,2]. However, our proposed theory suitably explains this phenomenon"See sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927650524001130
Could be some very big news.
This is not a section for your minimal ability to comprehend.This is not the section for your trolling. Read again.
Or … and try to follow along here … you could just play it for a moment or two. She guts the paper.So are you going to sum up why any of us should watch that video?
not me.......~S~Both these links now work for me
She does? How so?Or … and try to follow along here … you could just play it for a moment or two. She guts the paper.
She guts the paper.
Where is the link?So are you going to sum up why any of us should watch that video?
Just tap the video, then tap the youtube logo.Where is the link?
Sabine is a traditionalist, she's already been wrong a lot.
I'll watch the video though, if someone can please post a current link.