Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
No, the video shows a 7% reading for a mystery something at an unspecified time. An honest person would not instantly declare that 7% meant the container during the experiment. A dishonest person would. Thus, you and jc do.
Meanwhile, they do say they addressed the problem of reproducing atmospheric levels of 350 ppm CO2 and 1800 ppb methane. Since that's what they say they use, an honest person would assume they did indeed use those levels.
So they set out the cases, purged them all with a non-greenhouse gas, added 350 ppm CO2 to one, 1800 ppb methane to another, and left the other two as controls with no greenhouse gases. Though there would have been water vapor inside all of them, due to the ice sculptures. I suggest you retreat to a "I asked for 120 ppm, not 350 ppm!" defense, being your previous objections are so dumb.
Again you fail... miserably..
According to the Mythbusters site and Discovery Channel , they did indeed place CO2 at 7% of atmosphere for their experiment. The point of the experiment was to show "global warming is plausible". The problem is, they had to place levels never seen on earth into the 3' x 3' x 4' boxes to obtain their results. They also stated that they had to go above current CO2 levels in order to show the plausibility.
Their original show in season 2003 was done using glass cylinders but was unsuccessful at proving significant warming vs the control cylinders. They added just enough CO2 to reach 800ppm where it had little to no effect and was then cut from airing.
I have yet to receive a reply from my email asking Discovery Channel to come clean and provide the data for all of their experiments to the general public. Also to explain why they would place 70,000ppm in an experiment knowing it has no basis in reality for the earth.
Not going to hold my breath waiting either..