Putin makes his true ambitions known.

All you lefties do is spew anti-Russian propaganda and accuse anyone who doesn’t buy it as a “Russian stooge” or some shit.

You can’t debate any point.
LMAO again!!

This time at "anti Russian propaganda"

laughing1.gif
 
That's the point. This is exactly why Russia will prefer to nuke the USA first to allow them deploy IRBMs in Europe (especially in Ukraine).
Lol, toss them nukes what does your dumb ducking ass think is going to happen?
 
It’s w
FAKE NEWS , old socks

Pooters is simply carrying out what he promised .

As he has already decimated three UAF armies it does not really matter what his enemies think or say .

They can bluster and threaten until the proverbial cows return home , but there is nothing that the bankrupt US and WEF run western countries can do about it .

Moscow sets the agenda and will decide when to stop --- if at all .
It is what Putin said.

He has no interest in peace, only conquest.
 
It’s w

It is what Putin said.

He has no interest in peace, only conquest.
We are interested in safety and wealth of Russian people. We don't need a ceasefire. What we need is good peace, lasting and reliable peace. Not a third Minsk agreement, that will give the EU opportunity to get themselves prepared to the war. We need to eradicate the very roots of the war.
 
Nukes right back. We won't enter directly and they won't toss nukes.
It depends mostly on definitions of "directly"
At least we all better hope. Or we are all dead.
Not "all". May be few million after Russian counter-force strike. And then Russia, highly likely, will suggest a peace treaty (which will include returning of Alaska and independence of California).
 
Putin says that if we do not knuckle under to his demands that he will take more of Ukraine. Of course, that is humorous as he is already doing all that he can to do that. What we really need to do is to double our support of Ukraine, and lend Ukraine the use of a couple of divisions of Marines. You know, that military force that Putrid Pete is trying to eliminate.

You seriously want to put US boots on the ground in a war between two countries halfway around the world?

That's all Russia needs to rally what must be a deflated
 
^^^The lefty warmongers are getting hard thinking about more dead American soldiers.
Same line you isolationists used prior to Pearl Harbor. Any gain that Russia gets out of it's aggression will be incentitive for further aggression. And we will be involved.
 
You seriously want to put US boots on the ground in a war between two countries halfway around the world?

That's all Russia needs to rally what must be a deflated
Let's see, the isolationists of the 20th century let us avoid getting involved in a two front war in Europe and the Pacific. Didn't they?
 
Let's see, the isolationists of the 20th century let us avoid getting involved in a two front war in Europe and the Pacific. Didn't they?
The war where the hawks got us involved enough to take the pressure off of Russia (from Germany) who still got a lot of territory after the wary anyway?

That two front war?
 
I tend to agree. But the problem is, the left think its okay for Putin to push back as long as it is Trump they are pushing back against.

Me, I would have already reduced Moscow to rubble.
First of all, it is the right wing that is constantly defending Putin. Just look at this thread to see who is defending Russia's aggression. We lefties realize from the history of the 20th century and Sudetenland what letting an aggressive dictator have his way results in. And I second the idea of reducing Moscow to rubble or at least until the Russians realize they must bring their troops back within their legal borders. However, reducing Moscow to rubble may not be necessary. Destroy all the pipelines from their arctic oil wells, and they freeze up, requiring a long time to repair. No fuel for the home front or military, and winters are cold in Russia.
 
The war where the hawks got us involved enough to take the pressure off of Russia (from Germany) who still got a lot of territory after the wary anyway?

That two front war?
Yes, two front war. Europe and the Pacific war against Japan. Had uncles in both fronts.
 
Lol, toss them nukes what does your dumb ducking ass think is going to happen?
Most of Russia is West of the Urals. That is a much smaller area than the US, the EU, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The nukes get used, there will be no Russia. And Russia knows it.
 
15th post
Yes, two front war. Europe and the Pacific war against Japan. Had uncles in both fronts.
Who cares who was in them. I had family too. Not relevant to the point.

At least one front didn't need to come into being when it did. Several historians have written about what colasal screw up it was.

Of course, we then handed all of eastern Europe over to Russia because she was close by and we were spent fighting on two fronts.

Stalin would not go against the Japs until Russia was defeated. We, spent ourselves on that end. He probably lost next to noboody and expanded Soviet Control thanks to our bloodletting.

Great job.
 
Most of Russia is West of the Urals. That is a much smaller area than the US, the EU, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The nukes get used, there will be no Russia. And Russia knows it.
Now you are talking nuclear war. Wonderful.

Are you drunk? She doesn't go down without a fight and we probably lose several million.

Good think you are not in charge.
 
Uncle Vlad needs attention. He is not happy that Maduro is receiving all the attention.
 
It may be time for the US to take a direct hand in this.

It appears that the European cowards are not willing to protect their own.
Right, the American ones will.
Where's my rusty old tomahawk?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom