Public school children forced to pray to Allah

which religion advocates pissing on women for sport?

None , that I'm aware of. Which advocates being a 57 y/o dumb shit who behaves like he's 12?

so you're an atheist i take it?

Nope, just a human who sometimes makes mistakes. None of which ever included blowing up innocent civilians, so tell me again how Christians are as bad as Muslims?

I would be ashamed of my dad if he behaved like you to. For real.
 
None , that I'm aware of. Which advocates being a 57 y/o dumb shit who behaves like he's 12?

so you're an atheist i take it?

Nope, just a human who sometimes makes mistakes. None of which ever included blowing up innocent civilians, so tell me again how Christians are as bad as Muslims?

I would be ashamed of my dad if he behaved like you to. For real.
Ahhhhh, give del a break....He obviously got into the youngin's stash again.
 
None , that I'm aware of. Which advocates being a 57 y/o dumb shit who behaves like he's 12?

so you're an atheist i take it?

Nope, just a human who sometimes makes mistakes. None of which ever included blowing up innocent civilians, so tell me again how Christians are as bad as Muslims?

I would be ashamed of my dad if he behaved like you to. For real.

i don't believe i ever said christians are as bad as muslims. what i agreed with is that there is no qualitative difference in terrorist acts based on the religion of the perpetrators.

i realize that nuanced thinking isn't in your skill set, so i don't expect you to be able to follow this line of reasoning, but i thought i'd lay it out for other, more intelligent posters.

as i've stated before, the opinion of someone who thinks urinating on another human being is humorous really is de minimis.
 
i don't believe i ever said christians are as bad as muslims. what i agreed with is that there is no qualitative difference in terrorist acts based on the religion of the perpetrators.

Obviously Christians are NOT in the Modern Day...

There are no Christian Leaders around the World, aside from Fuckstain, Inbred Yokels like Phelps, who would Advocate for Terror.

But the Middle East is FULL of Islamic Leaders who Advocate for it... Countries that are Ruled under Islamic Law, that not only Advocates for Terror Against others, but Against their own People.

In the Modern Day, Islam is the Problem and a Handful of Westernized Muslims don't Negate this Fact.

A Healthy Analogy would be this...

Muslims that Denounce Terror and the Stoning of Women for having been Raped and all of the other Ills of Islam are about as Rare as the Fred Phelps Christians of the World are.

Islam is FAR Worse than Christianity in the Modern Day and is Dire Need of a Reformation.

:)

peace...
 
so in your benighted opinion, a christian terrorist is not as bad as a muslim terrorist, because he/she is a christian?

that's world class stupidity

kudos

I never said that. You did. Is your argument so weak and lame that you have to put words in my mouth? Pathetic.

What is Al-taqiyya?

so you didn't say this?

Jack Fate is now lying because I have been beating his rhetorical butt in another thread.

I have been asking JF if American Christians who embrace terrorism are as bad as Muslim Americans who embrace terrorism.

He won't answer the question.

I have stated flatly that I believe religious terrorism is wrong, wrong, wrong. Answer the question, Jack.

Your premise is wrong. You assume that Christian terrorism is equal to Islamic Terrorism. When you have a premise that is dishonest then you're pretty much a dishonest person to begin with.

how else should one take this if not as a defense of terrorists who are christian?

keep swinging, corky :thup:

Do you consider Christian terrorism equal to Islamic terrorism?
 
I never said that. You did. Is your argument so weak and lame that you have to put words in my mouth? Pathetic.

What is Al-taqiyya?

so you didn't say this?

Your premise is wrong. You assume that Christian terrorism is equal to Islamic Terrorism. When you have a premise that is dishonest then you're pretty much a dishonest person to begin with.

how else should one take this if not as a defense of terrorists who are christian?

keep swinging, corky :thup:

Do you consider Christian terrorism equal to Islamic terrorism?

qualitatively? absolutely.

next?
 
so you're an atheist i take it?

Nope, just a human who sometimes makes mistakes. None of which ever included blowing up innocent civilians, so tell me again how Christians are as bad as Muslims?

I would be ashamed of my dad if he behaved like you to. For real.

i don't believe i ever said christians are as bad as muslims. what i agreed with is that there is no qualitative difference in terrorist acts based on the religion of the perpetrators.

i realize that nuanced thinking isn't in your skill set, so i don't expect you to be able to follow this line of reasoning, but i thought i'd lay it out for other, more intelligent posters.

as i've stated before, the opinion of someone who thinks urinating on another human being is humorous really is de minimis.

Ah double dishonesty from your dumb ass in one post, excellent.

A) No one was making the argument that qualitatively Islamic terrorism was worse than Christian terrorism, rather the argument was made that quantitatively Islamic terrorism is FAR worse than Christian terrorism. You are the dumb shit that either purposefully, or just out of sheer stupidity misread the statement. I tend to lead towards the former since it was already explained to you once and you ignored it, but I am fully prepared to accept the possibility that you are so ******* stupid that you didn't even get it after having it explained to you once. Hopefully it doesn't just go in one ear and out your Depends this time.

B) I said the story was funny, I never said the act itself was funny, and in fact I posted that I feel horrible for doing it. Kinda like you laugh when you see someone get hurt after you realize they weren't injured.

I know those two probably stretched your thinking capabilities right to their limits, so I will wait for the smoke to clear before posting more.
 
Last edited:
Nope, just a human who sometimes makes mistakes. None of which ever included blowing up innocent civilians, so tell me again how Christians are as bad as Muslims?

I would be ashamed of my dad if he behaved like you to. For real.

i don't believe i ever said christians are as bad as muslims. what i agreed with is that there is no qualitative difference in terrorist acts based on the religion of the perpetrators.

i realize that nuanced thinking isn't in your skill set, so i don't expect you to be able to follow this line of reasoning, but i thought i'd lay it out for other, more intelligent posters.

as i've stated before, the opinion of someone who thinks urinating on another human being is humorous really is de minimis.

Ah double dishonesty from your dumb ass in one thread, excellent.

A) No one was making the argument that qualitatively Islamic terrorism was worse than Christian terrorism, rather the argument was made that quantitatively Islamic terrorism is FAR worse than Christian terrorism. You are the dumb shit that either purposefully, or just out of sheer stupidity misread the statement. I tend to lead towards the former since it was already explained to you once and you ignored it, but I am fully prepared to accept the possibility that you are so ******* stupid that you didn't even get it after having it explained to you once. Hopefully it doesn't just go in one ear and out your Depends this time.

B) I said the story was funny, I never said the act itself was funny, and in fact I posted that I feel horrible for doing it. Kinda like you laugh when you see someone get hurt after you realize they weren't injured.

I know those two probably stretched your thinking capabilities right to their limits, so I will wait for the smoke to clear before posting more.

:rofl:

yeah, that's gonna happen

as far as i know, there's been no differentiation expressed prior to my post between qualitative and quantitative in this thread. sorry, i don't read minds-not even really small ones.

see previous posts re: your opinion and its impact.
 
Last edited:
qualitatively? absolutely.

next?

Funny stuff. Pathetic.

<shrug>

i'm sorry you're not too bright, but there's naught i can do about it.


if you want to believe that terrorist acts perpetrated by christians are somehow *better* than those perpetrated by muslims, you're welcome to it.

I have a question for you del:

What acts of christian terror are you referring to specifically .
 
15th post
Funny stuff. Pathetic.

<shrug>

i'm sorry you're not too bright, but there's naught i can do about it.


if you want to believe that terrorist acts perpetrated by christians are somehow *better* than those perpetrated by muslims, you're welcome to it.

I have a question for you del:

What acts of christian terror are you referring to specifically .

i'm not referring to any specific act, christian or islamic.

just terrorism in general. i see no point in trying to keep score.
 
i don't believe i ever said christians are as bad as muslims. what i agreed with is that there is no qualitative difference in terrorist acts based on the religion of the perpetrators.

i realize that nuanced thinking isn't in your skill set, so i don't expect you to be able to follow this line of reasoning, but i thought i'd lay it out for other, more intelligent posters.

as i've stated before, the opinion of someone who thinks urinating on another human being is humorous really is de minimis.

Ah double dishonesty from your dumb ass in one thread, excellent.

A) No one was making the argument that qualitatively Islamic terrorism was worse than Christian terrorism, rather the argument was made that quantitatively Islamic terrorism is FAR worse than Christian terrorism. You are the dumb shit that either purposefully, or just out of sheer stupidity misread the statement. I tend to lead towards the former since it was already explained to you once and you ignored it, but I am fully prepared to accept the possibility that you are so ******* stupid that you didn't even get it after having it explained to you once. Hopefully it doesn't just go in one ear and out your Depends this time.

B) I said the story was funny, I never said the act itself was funny, and in fact I posted that I feel horrible for doing it. Kinda like you laugh when you see someone get hurt after you realize they weren't injured.

I know those two probably stretched your thinking capabilities right to their limits, so I will wait for the smoke to clear before posting more.

:rofl:

yeah, that's gonna happen

as far as i know, there's been no differentiation expressed prior to my post between qualitative and quantitative in this thread. sorry, i don't read minds-not even really small ones.

see previous posts re: your opinion and its impact.

It takes a lot to get Turd Ferguson to renig.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: del

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom