Psych exams for gun purchases

[Hollie]

Yawn... I'm all for a less sweeping law that keeps guns out of the hands of people like Salvador Ramos...

but if you think the only way to keep guns out of his hands is to take them out of yours, too... I'm down with that.

My point was, the NRA used to support sensible gun control. Today, they go around suing any town that even tries MODERATE laws to keep guns out of the hands of the crazies.



Those Asian cultures accept suicide as normal... we don't.

Most of us are getting pretty sick and tired of being held hostage to the Ammosexuals.

The NRA and, for that matter, responsible, legal gun owners support sensible gun control. It's senseless to presume that the rabid leftist version of gun confiscation and outright bans is in any way sensible.

If you think the only way to impose leftist authoritarianism is to strip away portions of the Constitution, you can flail your ''I'll confiscate your Firearms" Pom Poms before the Supreme court. I'm down with that.

 

[JoeB131]

The NRA and, for that matter, responsible, legal gun owners support sensible gun control. It's senseless to presume that the rabid leftist version of gun confiscation and outright bans is in any way sensible.

If you think the only way to impose leftist authoritarianism is to strip away portions of the Constitution, you can flail your ''I'll confiscate your Firearms" Pom Poms before the Supreme court. I'm down with that.

What sensible gun control is that.

An 18 year old kid with mental problems and a juvenile record was able to walk into a gun store and LEGALLY buy two military grade weapons, which he used to murder 21 people.

What part of that is sensible to you?

 

[Hollie]

What sensible gun control is that.

An 18 year old kid with mental problems and a juvenile record was able to walk into a gun store and LEGALLY buy two military grade weapons, which he used to murder 21 people.

What part of that is sensible to you?

Leftists / gun fetishists insist that legal, responsible gun owners be punished for the crimes of the mentally disturbed. That is not a principle of law that applies in this country.

It's a failing of those same Leftists / gun fetishists who use terms such as ''military grade'' weapons when they hear slogans spewed from the wailing, screeching liberal media talking heads. What, exactly, is ''military grade'' about an AR-15? Describe what makes any commonly purchased civilian firearm ''military grade''. You can't. You simply repeat leftist slogans because you know nothing of firearms and the leftist script is not to be veered from.

Why isn't your dtivers license suspended until you take a drivers education course because someone else was drinking and driving and caused an accident?

 

[2aguy]

Yawn... I'm all for a less sweeping law that keeps guns out of the hands of people like Salvador Ramos...

but if you think the only way to keep guns out of his hands is to take them out of yours, too... I'm down with that.

My point was, the NRA used to support sensible gun control. Today, they go around suing any town that even tries MODERATE laws to keep guns out of the hands of the crazies.



Those Asian cultures accept suicide as normal... we don't.

Most of us are getting pretty sick and tired of being held hostage to the Ammosexuals.

The NRA actually supports sensible gun laws....no guns for violent felons, no guns for the dangerously mentally ill.......

You want to take guns from people who committed no crime...

I know, you play games with the suicide rate and pretend that Japan having a higher suicide rate vs. the U.S. is related to their culture...while denying the criminal culture of the U.S........but you can't explain how it is they commit suicide more often without guns than Americans do with guns.....

 

[2aguy]

What sensible gun control is that.

An 18 year old kid with mental problems and a juvenile record was able to walk into a gun store and LEGALLY buy two military grade weapons, which he used to murder 21 people.

What part of that is sensible to you?

He didn't have a juvenile record...you liar...if he had, it would have popped on the Federal Background check that they did on him.....

You just lied right there....because the truth doesn't support anything you believe.

 

[JoeB131]

Leftists / gun fetishists insist that legal, responsible gun owners be punished for the crimes of the mentally disturbed. That is not a principle of law that applies in this country.

Really, then why do I have to put my shoes in an X-ray machine every time I go through the airport because 20 years ago, some idiot tried to light his shoes on fire?
Why do I have to pull off three levels of protective seals because 40 years ago, some idiot poisoned some Tylenol.

It's a failing of those same Leftists / gun fetishists who use terms such as ''military grade'' weapons when they hear slogans spewed from the wailing, screeching liberal media talking heads. What, exactly, is ''military grade'' about an AR-15? Describe what makes any commonly purchased civilian firearm ''military grade''. You can't. You simply repeat leftist slogans because you know nothing of firearms and the leftist script is not to be veered from.

Here's what makes it "military grade" - other than a sear that keeps it from firing on full automatic, the AR-15 is IDENTICAL to the M-16 I used to carry in the army. It was specifically designed to meet standards put down by the US Army.

He didn't have a juvenile record...you liar...if he had, it would have popped on the Federal Background check that they did on him.....

You just lied right there....because the truth doesn't support anything you believe.

Salvador Ramos Arrested 4 Years Ago for Planning Attack at 18—Texas Rep.

Texas Rep. Tony Gonzales claimed the Uvalde shooter had been arrested for planning a school shooting once he turned 18.

www.newsweek.com

 

[2aguy]

Really, then why do I have to put my shoes in an X-ray machine every time I go through the airport because 20 years ago, some idiot tried to light his shoes on fire?
Why do I have to pull off three levels of protective seals because 40 years ago, some idiot poisoned some Tylenol.



Here's what makes it "military grade" - other than a sear that keeps it from firing on full automatic, the AR-15 is IDENTICAL to the M-16 I used to carry in the army. It was specifically designed to meet standards put down by the US Army.

Salvador Ramos Arrested 4 Years Ago for Planning Attack at 18—Texas Rep.

Texas Rep. Tony Gonzales claimed the Uvalde shooter had been arrested for planning a school shooting once he turned 18.

www.newsweek.com

Wrong....the M-16 you carried had the ability to fire fully automatic.......big fucking difference.....

The AR-15 is no different from any other rifle in this country.....it fires one bullet, for each pull of the trigger, just like every other rifle that is a semi-auto rifle....

You assholes think you can use it to scare uninformed Americans into giving you the power to ban guns....

The FOIA request itself was prompted from a Nov. 2017 article in The Atlantic in which the magazine, unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with its anti-gun bent, attempted to bolster a claim that “these rifles were meant for the military, not civilians.”

“Colt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the ‘Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle’ began on Jan 2, 1964,”

one critic of the article contended. “The M16 wasn’t issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasn’t standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didn’t officially replace the M14 until 1969.”




Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians

 

[JoeB131]

Wrong....the M-16 you carried had the ability to fire fully automatic.......big fucking difference.....

The AR-15 is no different from any other rifle in this country.....it fires one bullet, for each pull of the trigger, just like every other rifle that is a semi-auto rifle....

Except it has a longer range than most firearms, and a higher rate of fire, and can do more damage when it hits someone, which is why it's the gun of choice for mass shooters.

The M-16's ability to fire full auto wasn't really that useful, which is why it was replaced by the M249 for the auto-gunners in infantry squads.

 

[2aguy]

Except it has a longer range than most firearms, and a higher rate of fire, and can do more damage when it hits someone, which is why it's the gun of choice for mass shooters.

The M-16's ability to fire full auto wasn't really that useful, which is why it was replaced by the M249 for the auto-gunners in infantry squads.

It isn't longer range than most firearms you idiot......it is a rifle......just like any other rifle...you doofus....in fact, it is less accurate than bolt action rifles at long distances..which is why you will come for bolt action rifles too...

The M-16's ability to fire full auto wasn't really that useful, which is why it was replaced by the M249 for the auto-gunners in infantry squads.

It doesn't matter ........ the AR-15 is a regular rifle just like all the other rifles out there...it was patented as a civilian rifle and like a lot of technology first created for civilian use, the military adopted a modified version of it.....

Ever Watch the show Practical to Tactical on cable....where the host takes you through civilian things the military took on and vice versa...you moroon...

 

[Hollie]

Really, then why do I have to put my shoes in an X-ray machine every time I go through the airport because 20 years ago, some idiot tried to light his shoes on fire?
Why do I have to pull off three levels of protective seals because 40 years ago, some idiot poisoned some Tylenol.



Here's what makes it "military grade" - other than a sear that keeps it from firing on full automatic, the AR-15 is IDENTICAL to the M-16 I used to carry in the army. It was specifically designed to meet standards put down by the US Army.

Salvador Ramos Arrested 4 Years Ago for Planning Attack at 18—Texas Rep.

Texas Rep. Tony Gonzales claimed the Uvalde shooter had been arrested for planning a school shooting once he turned 18.

www.newsweek.com

I have no reason to believe you ever got close to an M-16. At any rate your stuttering and mumbling about airport security has no connection with this thread.

''Other than a sear''... Well, yeah. Other than a sear and other an FFL is required for a civilian to own an automatic weapon and other than they look similar.....

What other nonsensical attempts at comparisons can you offer?

You offered nothing about ''military grade'' weapons that magically tranforns an AR-15 to a M-16. Its just a nonsensical attempt at a pointless comparison.

I suppose a .308 Remington magically transforms into an M-40 because it kinda', sorta' looks the same.

 

[2aguy]

I have no reason to believe you ever got close to an M-16. At any rate your stuttering and mumbling about airport security has no connection with this thread.

''Other than a sear''... Well, yeah. Other than a sear and other an FFL is required for a civilian to own an automatic weapon and other than they look similar.....

What other nonsensical attempts at comparisons can you offer?

You offered nothing about ''military grade'' weapons that magically tranforns an AR-15 to a M-16. Its just a nonsensical attempt at a pointless comparison.

I suppose a .308 Remington magically transforms into an M-40 because it kinda', sorta' looks the same.

Yeah......if joe isn't lying he isn't posting.....

The AR-15 has never been used by the military.....bolt action rifles and pump action shotguns...the guns we are told are o.k.? They are actual, current military weapons used by militaries all round the world....

And that fact will be how the anti-gun fanatics go after them after they get semi-automatic rifles....

 

[JoeB131]

It isn't longer range than most firearms you idiot......it is a rifle......just like any other rifle...you doofus....in fact, it is less accurate than bolt action rifles at long distances..which is why you will come for bolt action rifles too...

Bolt rifles don't have that kind of fire rate..

Which is why the army hasn't used them since WWII.

It doesn't matter ........ the AR-15 is a regular rifle just like all the other rifles out there...it was patented as a civilian rifle and like a lot of technology first created for civilian use, the military adopted a modified version of it.....

Ever Watch the show Practical to Tactical on cable....where the host takes you through civilian things the military took on and vice versa...you moroon...

I don't watch Ammosexual Porn like you do... frankly, how much time do you spend thinking about guns?

 

[Hollie]

Except it has a longer range than most firearms, and a higher rate of fire, and can do more damage when it hits someone, which is why it's the gun of choice for mass shooters.

The M-16's ability to fire full auto wasn't really that useful, which is why it was replaced by the M249 for the auto-gunners in infantry squads.

That was terrible.

Did you know the Army has contracted with Sig Sauer for a new rifle and cartridge intended to address some perceived shortcomings of the M-16 cartridge in terms of range and 'knock down' power?

Did you know the M-16 is not a 'long range' firearm due to reasons which preceded the Army's decision?

 

[JoeB131]

That was terrible.

Did you know the Army has contracted with Sig Sauer for a new rifle and cartridge intended to address some perceived shortcomings of the M-16 cartridge in terms of range and 'knock down' power?

Did you know the M-16 is not a 'long range' firearm due to reasons which preceded the Army's decision?

Actually, the M16 is an awesome weapon. I've talked to Special Forces guys who can't stop praising it for it's efficiency.

Now that said, we are talking about a 50 year old design. I honestly can't think of any other assault rifle that has had that long of a service life. I'm actually kind of surprised that the Army hasn't looked towards replacing it.

By comparison, the M-14 rifle was the standard issue for the army for only about five years. The M-1 Garand was only standard issue for 22 years.

 

[2aguy]

Bolt rifles don't have that kind of fire rate..

Which is why the army hasn't used them since WWII.



I don't watch Ammosexual Porn like you do... frankly, how much time do you spend thinking about guns?

The army uses bolt action rifles.........every branch of the services.......

I don't think about guns.....I think about human rights and the way idiots like you are willing to take them away.

 

[2aguy]

Actually, the M16 is an awesome weapon. I've talked to Special Forces guys who can't stop praising it for it's efficiency.

Now that said, we are talking about a 50 year old design. I honestly can't think of any other assault rifle that has had that long of a service life. I'm actually kind of surprised that the Army hasn't looked towards replacing it.

By comparison, the M-14 rifle was the standard issue for the army for only about five years. The M-1 Garand was only standard issue for 22 years.

The reason they were replaced was weight, difficulty cleaning them, and the weight of the ammo.

The army went with the lighter rifle, and the lighter ammo....

They are now looking to replace the M-4 with a weapon with more firepower...

So soon....the M-4 will no longer be a military weapon....what will you assholes say then....?

 

[Hollie]

Actually, the M16 is an awesome weapon. I've talked to Special Forces guys who can't stop praising it for it's efficiency.

Now that said, we are talking about a 50 year old design. I honestly can't think of any other assault rifle that has had that long of a service life. I'm actually kind of surprised that the Army hasn't looked towards replacing it.

By comparison, the M-14 rifle was the standard issue for the army for only about five years. The M-1 Garand was only standard issue for 22 years.

"Assault rifle". Now that's pretty darn funny. Typical for leftist wind-up dolls. Pull a string and a monotone voice recites a slogan.

What is an "assault rifle"? I never saw one a section for those in a firearms store.

Otherwise, yes, your nonsense claim about an AR-15 being a long range rifle suggests you have no experience with that rifle.

I've also spoken with special forces guys. They never recall speaking with you.

 

[JoeB131]

I don't think about guns.....

 

[JoeB131]

Otherwise, yes, your nonsense claim about an AR-15 being a long range rifle suggests you have no experience with that rifle.

You mean other than 11 years in the Army firing the M16?

Maximum Effective range of 420 meters... That's a number that sticks with me, even 40 years later.

 

[Hollie]

You mean other than 11 years in the Army firing the M16?

Maximum Effective range of 420 meters... That's a number that sticks with me, even 40 years later.

Aren't the interwebs great? A poser like you who thinks an AR is a long range rifle can make believe he knows the first thing about firearms.

Do you also spend your weekends commanding the French forces at Waterloo?