PROVEN: Hillary Clinton DID COMPROMISE U.S. National Security

[Redfish]

No she should not, because we HAD INVESTIGATION and then RE-INVESTIGATION OF INVESTIGATION...

....By proven criminally biased

Hate to break it to you, but that's a total fantasy. You are so hopped up on politico coolaid you can't tell fact from wishful fiction.

Neither Comey nor Inspector General were proven to be criminally biased.

wrong, that was the IG conclusion, the facts that were presented say otherwise. The fix was/is in. The establishment cannot afford for their members to be brought to justice.

 

[easyt65]

Lack of actual convictions allow the Democrats, snowflakes, and most importantly Obama and his criminal administration to deny the already-proven crimes they committed (which includes Obstruction, Conspiracy, Sedition, and Treason).

Allowing this to go forward and them to be actually held accountable would destroy Obama, the Democratic Party and make the US look like a 3rd World country led by a 3rd World Dictator -Wannabe under Obama .. and they will never let that happen.

 

[Redfish]

Lack of actual convictions allow the Democrats, snowflakes, and most importantly Obama and his criminal administration to deny the already-proven crimes they committed (which includes Obstruction, Conspiracy, Sedition, and Treason).

Allowing this to go forward and them to be actually held accountable would destroy Obama, the Democratic Party and make the US look like a 3rd World country led by a 3rd World Dictator -Wannabe under Obama .. and they will never let that happen.

well said and 100% correct.

 

[AntonToo]

Link to where it’s illegal to e-mail classified information.

The law was broken as soon as the information was removed from a secure place or system.

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material


.

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the **** do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The ***** set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The ***** and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The ***** and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The ***** and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The ***** communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the ***** to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

Hey dipshit, what part of I hate Trump in texts by investigators do you not get?


you really are retarded....he lists tons of bias.....read the report not the summary.

You can hate whoever you want, thats your private right so long as you conduct yourself PROFESSIONALLY at work.

IG has seen no evidence of bias in Strzok’s descision making in Clinton case and reported as much in black and white.

 

[AntonToo]

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the **** do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The ***** set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The ***** and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The ***** and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The ***** and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The ***** communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the ***** to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

What did you fail to understand that the IG said there was no DOCUMENTED bias, meaning no one was stupid enough to put in writing or personally tell someone they were tanking the investigation, there was no smoking gun. There is adequate proof that bias existed, more than 50 FBI officials leaking to the press, multiple people were disparaging Trump and his supporters. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence.


.

Stop posting bullshit, the exact quote is:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations. Rather we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assesment of the facts, the law, and past department practice"

It doesn't get any clearer than that and you'll have to find a more sane way to deal.

wow it only takes a d by their name to convince you.......what a moron.

What ******* d?

 

[francoHFW]

Do you ever get tired of being wrong about everything, and of nothing in the real world ever coming from any of the nonsense you post?

how was he wrong? Do you ever get tired of posting nonsense, with no specific rebuttal of other's posts?

Also not true. You guys should get along well.

See you have to learn how to reply

what was also not true?

his post?
my saying you post nonsense?

I mean dude, I gave you an opportunity to say what was wrong about his post

you didn't

so I'll ask again, what is wrong about his post?

If it is not reported by NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSLSD, NYT, WAPO, etc....many Americans won't accept it.

These same Americans will do well in our Orwellian future.

Probably because it and the memo are GOP BS, doop. All investigated multiple times and nothing.... Except as propaganda to make Hillary lose.

 

[gipper]

Do you ever get tired of being wrong about everything, and of nothing in the real world ever coming from any of the nonsense you post?

how was he wrong? Do you ever get tired of posting nonsense, with no specific rebuttal of other's posts?

Also not true. You guys should get along well.

See you have to learn how to reply

what was also not true?

his post?
my saying you post nonsense?

I mean dude, I gave you an opportunity to say what was wrong about his post

you didn't

so I'll ask again, what is wrong about his post?

If it is not reported by NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSLSD, NYT, WAPO, etc....many Americans won't accept it.

These same Americans will do well in our Orwellian future.

Probably because it and the memo are GOP BS, doop. All investigated multiple times and nothing.... Except as propaganda to make Hillary lose.

If you don't think Cankles is a criminal, you are incapable of thinking. She is the worst of the worst. That is pretty bad when you KNOW that the entire political class are criminals.

...but partisans like you, are unable to see the truth. You reflexively believe whatever DNC media tell you.

You would never take your news from the Rs, why do you accept it from the Ds?

 

[LeftofLeft]

[1 “secret” level e-mail, huh?

'President Obama himself declared the documents were SO classified that 'to release them in any format would cause grave damage to our national security'.

So are you saying Obama was stupid or just lied to keep all of her criminal documents (in violation of the FOOIA and Federal Records Act) hidden / suppressed?

Classified Documents were found on the server, Obama said no way these could be released due to National Security risk yet all of the Democrats are certain Hillary’s server was not exfiltrated but the DNCs servers were hacked as per Trump
Collusion with Russia but the DNC does not want to turn the servers over for Forensics.

Everyone got that?

 

[Redfish]

The law was broken as soon as the information was removed from a secure place or system.

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material


.

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the **** do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The ***** set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The ***** and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The ***** and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The ***** and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The ***** communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the ***** to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

Hey dipshit, what part of I hate Trump in texts by investigators do you not get?


you really are retarded....he lists tons of bias.....read the report not the summary.

You can hate whoever you want, thats your private right so long as you conduct yourself PROFESSIONALLY at work.

IG has seen no evidence of bias in Strzok’s descision making in Clinton case and reported as much in black and white.

are you a total fricken loon? The email exchanges between him and his girlfriend show clear bias in decision making. He was in charge of both the Clinton email investigation and the Russia investigation. He wanted Trump to lose, that is crystal clear, and that bias was reflected in his decisions as to which investigation to pursue and which to ignore.

I don't know how the IG missed what all of us can see clearly, the only possible explanation is that they were afraid that putting out the truth would bring down the entire house of cards that is the DC establishment, including Obama and the Clintons.

 

[buckeye45_73]

The law was broken as soon as the information was removed from a secure place or system.

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material


.

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the **** do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The ***** set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The ***** and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The ***** and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The ***** and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The ***** communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the ***** to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

Hey dipshit, what part of I hate Trump in texts by investigators do you not get?


you really are retarded....he lists tons of bias.....read the report not the summary.

You can hate whoever you want, thats your private right so long as you conduct yourself PROFESSIONALLY at work.

IG has seen no evidence of bias in Strzok’s descision making in Clinton case and reported as much in black and white.

yeah , that never happens....people bring shit to work all the time. and there is no way with that much hate you'll act professionally or that much love for Hillary you'll be objective, which according to the texts, they had plans......to get rid of Trump....I wonder how???

 

[buckeye45_73]

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The ***** set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The ***** and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The ***** and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The ***** and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The ***** communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the ***** to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

What did you fail to understand that the IG said there was no DOCUMENTED bias, meaning no one was stupid enough to put in writing or personally tell someone they were tanking the investigation, there was no smoking gun. There is adequate proof that bias existed, more than 50 FBI officials leaking to the press, multiple people were disparaging Trump and his supporters. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence.


.

Stop posting bullshit, the exact quote is:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations. Rather we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assesment of the facts, the law, and past department practice"

It doesn't get any clearer than that and you'll have to find a more sane way to deal.

wow it only takes a d by their name to convince you.......what a moron.

What ******* d?

d = democrat....if they have that,, they're a saint in your eyes.

 

[AntonToo]

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

What did you fail to understand that the IG said there was no DOCUMENTED bias, meaning no one was stupid enough to put in writing or personally tell someone they were tanking the investigation, there was no smoking gun. There is adequate proof that bias existed, more than 50 FBI officials leaking to the press, multiple people were disparaging Trump and his supporters. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence.


.

Stop posting bullshit, the exact quote is:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations. Rather we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assesment of the facts, the law, and past department practice"

It doesn't get any clearer than that and you'll have to find a more sane way to deal.

wow it only takes a d by their name to convince you.......what a moron.

What ******* d?

d = democrat....if they have that,, they're a saint in your eyes.

it's D, Democrat. d, democrat is simply someone who subscribes to democratic principles.

With that out of the way, again, what ******* Democrat?

 

[AntonToo]

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the **** do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The ***** set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The ***** and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The ***** and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The ***** and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The ***** communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the ***** to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

Hey dipshit, what part of I hate Trump in texts by investigators do you not get?


you really are retarded....he lists tons of bias.....read the report not the summary.

You can hate whoever you want, thats your private right so long as you conduct yourself PROFESSIONALLY at work.

IG has seen no evidence of bias in Strzok’s descision making in Clinton case and reported as much in black and white.

The email exchanges between him and his girlfriend show clear bias in decision making.

Which decision specifically? Because IG found ZERO in Clinton case.

 

[buckeye45_73]

What did you fail to understand that the IG said there was no DOCUMENTED bias, meaning no one was stupid enough to put in writing or personally tell someone they were tanking the investigation, there was no smoking gun. There is adequate proof that bias existed, more than 50 FBI officials leaking to the press, multiple people were disparaging Trump and his supporters. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence.


.

Stop posting bullshit, the exact quote is:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations. Rather we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assesment of the facts, the law, and past department practice"

It doesn't get any clearer than that and you'll have to find a more sane way to deal.

wow it only takes a d by their name to convince you.......what a moron.

What ******* d?

d = democrat....if they have that,, they're a saint in your eyes.

it's D, Democrat. d, democrat is simply someone who subscribes to democratic principles.

With that out of the way, again, what ******* Democrat?

Clinton
Strozk
you know the whole gang.....

Read the IG report, not the summary.......tell me how many instances of bias you see......

 

[buckeye45_73]

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The ***** set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The ***** and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The ***** and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The ***** and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The ***** communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the ***** to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

Hey dipshit, what part of I hate Trump in texts by investigators do you not get?


you really are retarded....he lists tons of bias.....read the report not the summary.

You can hate whoever you want, thats your private right so long as you conduct yourself PROFESSIONALLY at work.

IG has seen no evidence of bias in Strzok’s descision making in Clinton case and reported as much in black and white.

The email exchanges between him and his girlfriend show clear bias in decision making.

Which decision specifically? Because IG found ZERO in Clinton case.

Wrong, he just said in the CYA summary they aren't prosecuting........we'll see

 

[AntonToo]

Stop posting bullshit, the exact quote is:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations. Rather we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assesment of the facts, the law, and past department practice"

It doesn't get any clearer than that and you'll have to find a more sane way to deal.

wow it only takes a d by their name to convince you.......what a moron.

What ******* d?

d = democrat....if they have that,, they're a saint in your eyes.

it's D, Democrat. d, democrat is simply someone who subscribes to democratic principles.

With that out of the way, again, what ******* Democrat?

Clinton
Strozk
you know the whole gang.....

Read the IG report, not the summary.......tell me how many instances of bias you see......

Idiot, I QUOTED IG to which you responded with d nonsense as if I'm taking his word because he is a Democrat. I have no idea who he is politically.

 

[OKTexas]

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The ***** set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The ***** and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The ***** and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The ***** and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The ***** communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the ***** to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

Hey dipshit, what part of I hate Trump in texts by investigators do you not get?


you really are retarded....he lists tons of bias.....read the report not the summary.

You can hate whoever you want, thats your private right so long as you conduct yourself PROFESSIONALLY at work.

IG has seen no evidence of bias in Strzok’s descision making in Clinton case and reported as much in black and white.

The email exchanges between him and his girlfriend show clear bias in decision making.

Which decision specifically? Because IG found ZERO in Clinton case.

Actually he didn't, he just couldn't document any. Then in congressional testimony he said that bias put a cloud over the whole damn thing. Go figure.


.

 

[AntonToo]

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

Hey dipshit, what part of I hate Trump in texts by investigators do you not get?


you really are retarded....he lists tons of bias.....read the report not the summary.

You can hate whoever you want, thats your private right so long as you conduct yourself PROFESSIONALLY at work.

IG has seen no evidence of bias in Strzok’s descision making in Clinton case and reported as much in black and white.

The email exchanges between him and his girlfriend show clear bias in decision making.

Which decision specifically? Because IG found ZERO in Clinton case.

Actually he didn't, he just couldn't document any. Then in congressional testimony he said that bias put a cloud over the whole damn thing. Go figure.
.

WTF? He couldn't document any because he didn't find any.

 

[BlindBoo]

how was he wrong? Do you ever get tired of posting nonsense, with no specific rebuttal of other's posts?

Also not true. You guys should get along well.

See you have to learn how to reply

what was also not true?

his post?
my saying you post nonsense?

I mean dude, I gave you an opportunity to say what was wrong about his post

you didn't

so I'll ask again, what is wrong about his post?

If it is not reported by NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSLSD, NYT, WAPO, etc....many Americans won't accept it.

These same Americans will do well in our Orwellian future.

Probably because it and the memo are GOP BS, doop. All investigated multiple times and nothing.... Except as propaganda to make Hillary lose.

If you don't think Cankles is a criminal, you are incapable of thinking. She is the worst of the worst. That is pretty bad when you KNOW that the entire political class are criminals.

...but partisans like you, are unable to see the truth. You reflexively believe whatever DNC media tell you.

You would never take your news from the Rs, why do you accept it from the Ds?

She's not just a criminal, she's a Master Criminal with capital letters damn it!

Either that or the Retrumplicans are feckless fascist followers. The 2018 version of the Keystone Cops.

 

[OKTexas]

Hey dipshit, what part of I hate Trump in texts by investigators do you not get?


you really are retarded....he lists tons of bias.....read the report not the summary.

You can hate whoever you want, thats your private right so long as you conduct yourself PROFESSIONALLY at work.

IG has seen no evidence of bias in Strzok’s descision making in Clinton case and reported as much in black and white.

The email exchanges between him and his girlfriend show clear bias in decision making.

Which decision specifically? Because IG found ZERO in Clinton case.

Actually he didn't, he just couldn't document any. Then in congressional testimony he said that bias put a cloud over the whole damn thing. Go figure.
.

WTF? He couldn't document any because he didn't find any.

Yeah, keep ignoring what he said because it doesn't fit your propaganda. 5 of the 6 major players in the investigation are no longer in the FBI, the 6th was escorted out of the building last Friday. Name any other major investigation where that has happened.


.