Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
thepostmillennial.com
Please demonstrate the rational basis for your claim that what happened re: Rittenhouse was "vigilante justice":If vigilante justice...
Warning!!!I can only see the opposite effect of enraging the gungoons even more.
" Can be allowed to happen ". Explain what you meant.That's America's ambition. To set the bar so low on self defense claims that even Chauvin's murder in broad daylight with video and several witnesses, can be allowed to happen.
So you're suggesting he should be convicted, and then sentenced, for political purposes and not based on evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he violated an actual crime?If vigilante justice is discouraged with a lengthy sentence for Rittenhouse, there could be the desired effect of discouraging it in the same way the police have been somewhat tamed by the Chauvin verdict.
But regardless of the verdict, I can only see the opposite effect of enraging the gungoons even more.
So you confess, then, that you're OK with judicial tyranny and political trials. Please do not pretend to be a conservative or libertarian.That’s the way our court system works.
If you have a problem with it, then I suggest you write them an angry letter.
I'm actually suggesting that America needs to apply the same rules of other democracies. The law was broken when an over anxious vigilante went hunting on the city streets with his gun.So you're suggesting he should be convicted, and then sentenced, for political purposes and not based on evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he violated an actual crime?
I'm actually suggesting that America needs to apply the same rules of other democracies. The law was broken when an over anxious vigilante went hunting on the city streets with his gun.
Doing that in Canada would be seen as premeditated murder or man slaughter at least, depending on the circumstances.
thepostmillennial.com
Are guns the only weapons of death or great bodily harm? If I attack someone with a baseball bat or even a sword or knife, they're not at risk of death or great bodily harm?Calling me a "Demmie" simply because I'm not trying to suck Rittenhouse's dick like you are is stupid. I'm an Independent, leaning conservative. I voted for Trump twice. So go fuck yourself.
Show me video or a photo of Rosenbaum and/or skateboard boy pointing a gun at Rittenhouse.
You can't do it, but you're too big of a chickenshit to simply admit that...
I'm actually suggesting that America needs to apply the same rules of other democracies. The law was broken when an over anxious vigilante went hunting on the city streets with his gun.
Doing that in Canada would be seen as premeditated murder or man slaughter at least, depending on the circumstances.
You guys don’t actually want to have a discussion based on the facts and developments in this case. Most of you just want to keep repeating the same talking points over and over again.Then charge him for that....not murder...this was self defense....
What?....You guys don’t actually want to have a discussion based on the facts and developments in this case. Most of you just want to keep repeating the same talking points over and over again.
Interesting link but not for that reason.BREAKING: Judge dismisses gun charges against Rittenhouse
Shroeder removed the charge of gun possession. Rittenhouse had pleaded not guilty to all six charges against him.
guess it was legal.
i'd ask Kmart for your money back on your law degree.
Please demonstrate your rational basis for this claim.I'm actually suggesting that America needs to apply the same rules of other democracies. T
Please demonstrate your rational basis for this claim.he law was broken when an over anxious vigilante went hunting on the city streets with his gun.
Because Canadian laws ar designed to protect criminals by making criminals out of those that defend themselves.Doing that in Canada would be seen as premeditated muder or man slaughter at least, depending on the circumstances.
Please demonstrate your rational basis for this claim.Nobody here should be missing the face of the Klan in that trial.
Each nation is sovereign...I'm actually suggesting that America needs to apply the same rules of other democracies.
If you didn't know I'm a Canadian then you know now, and so that line of spamming is off my radar.You should move to Canada or another country, With proof of your doing so, I'll happily donate some of the expenses.
Read up on the fact that there are federal laws that apply to all states, then spend some time supplying me with all the details.Each nation is sovereign...
Each State in America is also sovereign over the things it is sovereign over and isn't another nation...
That’s a compelling and persuasive argument.Kyle didn't do anything wrong----
That had nothing to do with his decision.The JUDGE after the lib media tried to destroy him with idiotic claims of racism because he made a joke about ordering lunch and hoping that it was coming via the LA ships, gave the prosecution a bone and said that they can try to claim such...
Perhaps you're a fiscal conservative. You're certainly not a justice conservative or a constitutional conservative; those conservatives don't call for the conviction of Americans for political purposes.I’m a conservative and I don’t want to see a place where we condone or encourage juvenile vigilantes to roam the streets acting as cops.
