In other words "separate but equal"? We
all know that isn't how it works. After Jim Crowe laws that was the state endorsed discrimination: separate but equal.
-No, how it works is one man one woman. Read a history book. Why can't they just call it a union?
Sounds good to me.
-So you are for separation from church and state..but then it is okay for the state to tell what they can and cannot do in church?
Can you say hypocrite?
If marriage isn't a right, then how come there aren't any laws against straight people doing it? What do straight people have to do to get married? Get a license and prove they aren't already married. That's it. What do gay people have to do to get married? They can't! The only people marriage is not a right for are gay.
Everyone in this nation can get married except gay people. That's how its discrimination.
-First of all...there are no laws saying a gay person can't get married. There are only laws against same-sex marriage.

"I'm straight and wanna marry my bud just to get benefits...aw but I can't." - goes both ways...watch Chuck and Larry
Are you kidding? They just want to flaunt what victory? And what "other gays" might you be referring to? The ones in the Catholic church?
And who is shoving their lives down someone else's throat?!
-Well if it looks like marriage, gets the same benefits as marriage, but
just isn't called marriage...then it seems like an agenda..
And there are gays who are more concerned with how to pay rent or put food on the table for their "partner" and that are content with being in a union together... Not to mention..plenty of straight couples stay together with not wanting to marry..to assume there are no gays like that is ignorant.
That's not even a logical argument!
- Why isn't it logical? So man and man is okay but man + man + man isn't?
Or a bi man with a husband and a wife? no polygamy? aww shoot..your discriminating now
Um, with gay people. They get to marry and so do straights. Incest is illegal. Homosexuality isn't.
-And Polygamy? Where do you draw the line for incest then? A 40 yr old and a 17 year old?
This is your church's propadanda! Don't make these kind of ignorant statments: marriage has never been sacred to aetheists or secular humanists beyond that it is a way of committing to someone for life; and it doesn't matter when there is a separation of church and state in this nation.
Religious beliefs should be kept out of government!
-but government can force churches to marry gays?
Can you spell H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E?
-Yes, unfortunately, ignorant people out number the enlightened.
LOL , unfortunately for your agenda...ignorant people are allowed to vote..
and unfortunately... Democracy does not rule out your so called ignorant.
ha..talk about fundamental rights and yet you wont defend my vote.
