Proof Obama and Schiff tried to overthrow the government

1774473457193.webp


Only the beginning. Judges, media, $1T fraud....current politicians.
 
I literally linked to the opinion

:laugh:

You've linked to AN opinion, not THE opinion.

So asstruth, what do you think think opinion is even about? Do you have any clue? Any clue at all?
 
Last edited:
The issue…read the opinion, that’s why i linked it

No dummy, they didn't.

The ruling is about Trump being able to appeal the conviction in a federal court based on possible conflict with Supreme Court ruling on immunity.

It is NOT AT ALL in itself an appeal of the conviction. You've linked it because, as usual, you don't know your face from your ass.


Any two second search would inform you that the appeal process is ongoing.
 
No dummy, they didn't.

The ruling is about Trump being able to appeal the conviction in a federal court based on possible conflict with Supreme Court ruling on immunity.

It is NOT AT ALL in itself an appeal of the conviction. You've linked it because, as usual, you don't know your face from your ass.


Any two second search would inform you that the appeal process is ongoing.
HAhaa of course it’s about his conviction you idiot
 
Not me, the circuit court said it

Hence why I linked the opinion

I've clearly explained what that particular opinion is about - Trump being able to appeal in the Federal court, and it is NOT an overturn of the coviction. Trump remains a convicted felon and the appeal process is ongoing.

I can't make you understand it, because you don't seem to WANT to understand anything.
 
Last edited:
I've clearly explained what that particular opinion is about - Trump being able to appeal in the Federal court, and it is NOT an overturn of the coviction. Trump remains a convicted felon and the appeal process is ongoing.

I can't make you understand it, because you don't seem to WANT to understand anything.
You’ve completely shown a lack of reading comprehension
 
No AntonToo .... tell us what the second crime was... It does not seem to list it. Seems the sixth amendment was not followed.... "to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation.."

For the second crime to bump the first charge into a felony... it would be listed in the indictment. Anything less is a rigged trial... Trump could not mount a defense if he did not know what the charge was

here it is show us copy and paste please
 
"Nature of accusation" is commiting the crime of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree 34 times.

He was not charged with any other crime in this case and was convicted on all those counts.
Let Judge Wilson tell you how obvious a joke the records keeping case was... the Sixth Amendment guarantees that individuals accused of crimes have the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusations against them, ensuring they can prepare an adequate defense. This is a fundamental protection within the American legal system. the was never done until the end of the trial. No where in the indictment was a second crime listed.



 
AntonToo
"to evade other laws"... what were the other laws? The first charge, record keeping, was only a misdemeanor. Please tell us that "other law" Trump was convicted of breaking that bumped it into a felony.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom