MagicMike
Platinum Member
Here is a really good article that might clear up some of your confusion about this issue.Snowflakes' 1st mistake is falsely claiming that the United States govt, with months of prior warning and Intel, could not prevent unarmed protestors from entering the Capitol.
REALLY?! Are you guys SURE you want to go with that, that this is the best you have?
SUCCESSFULLY, in the past, existing secure fencing they have have has been erected around the WH and USSC, preventing anyone from trespassing.
I appreciate the admission by snowflakes that prior to and on J6 the 'people powerless to prevent it' - yet who were successful in doing so in the past by protecting the WH & USSC Building - FAILED to do so on J6.
Of course since it is an article it IS going to require a little (just a tiny) bit of reading.
I know MAGAts aren't really fond of reading. I mean, if they were they probably wouldn't be MAGAts in the first place.
Anyway....give it your best try.
It will surprise no one to hear that many of these witnesses have been primarily concerned with defending their own performance. But when their testimony is read together, a pattern emerges. There is consensus, if not perfect consistency, about the lapses on January 6th.
The main takeaway: The January 6th security lag—the fact that it took more than three hours for the National Guard to arrive on Capitol Hill and secure the grounds—can largely be attributed to three factors: Washington bureaucracy, a backlash to the militarized response to Lafayette Square in June 2020, and concerns over how Trump might use the military for his political purposes.

Why the January 6th Mob Wasn’t Stopped in Time
Transcripts reveal where the bottlenecks were.
