Prices stubbornly staying high in trump land

“… because I say so”

Just ignore the date on the link as a means to calm your emotional requirement to press a false narrative.

The date of the link you were given was Jan. 30, 2025.

Weeks earlier would still be Jan. 2025.

Do I need to link you to a modern invention we call a calendar?

Weeks earlier. Before anyone saw Trump try to **** it up.
 
I dont understand this. Trump said he sould sort this out on day 1. Americans were des of a real leader.up with the years of biden dithering and longed for the firm hand of a real leader.

I expected a decree on day 1 telling chickens to lay more and the weather to improve in coffee growing areas. But that never happened.

Do you think his strategic focus on Greenland caused him to forget about the important things ?

Or maybe a Prez can only have a limited influence on food prices ? Sometimes world affairs intervene.

How long do you think maga will give him before they lose patience ?


Checking back in here, any move in prices?
 

Weeks earlier. Before anyone saw Trump try to **** it up.
That was quite the sidestep. Did you finally discover what a calendar is?

Identify for us your factual data that “Trump try to **** it up”.
 
That was quite the sidestep. Did you finally discover what a calendar is?

Identify for us your factual data that “Trump try to **** it up”.


 


That was a lot of cutting and pasting.

Did you understand why Trump was looking to impose tariffs, (foreign tariffs on US goods)?

Otherwise, none of your cutting and pasting is relevant to, “Trump try to **** it up”.
 
That was a lot of cutting and pasting.

Did you understand why Trump was looking to impose tariffs, (foreign tariffs on US goods)?

Otherwise, none of your cutting and pasting is relevant to, “Trump try to **** it up”.
It doesn’t matter why Trump wants to impose tariffs. It matters if it affects the economy.
 
It doesn’t matter why Trump wants to impose tariffs. It matters if it affects the economy.
Another song and dance. Your whining was about, “Trump try to **** it up”.

Identify for us how and why, “Trump try to **** it up”.
 
Like you said, you dont understand how befuddled you are.


Note the date. Jan. 2025.

Try paying attention to what is presented to you rather than falsifying what you cut and paste.

You really need to read your own links, Hollie:

That said, ISG doesn't expect US equities to meaningfully outperform non-US equities over the next five years - and most definitely not by the magnitude seen over the last 15 years. ISG's base case is for the S&P 500 index to deliver an 8% return in 2025 and 5% annualized over the next 5 years. ISG's forecast may differ from those of other groups at Goldman Sachs.

The piece then goes on to tout the performance of the US economy under Joe Biden, and extrapolates that the rule of law, and the governmental infrastructure underpinning US business would remain intact.

As we have seen, the governmental infrastructures underpinning US business, are being destroyed with a sledgehammer, and there are no checks or balances.
 
You really need to read your own links, Hollie:



The piece then goes on to tout the performance of the US economy under Joe Biden, and extrapolates that the rule of law, and the governmental infrastructure underpinning US business would remain intact.

As we have seen, the governmental infrastructures underpinning US business, are being destroyed with a sledgehammer, and there are no checks or balances.
You really need to read the links you were given.

Nothing in your frantic tirade says anything about “governmental infrastructures underpinning US business, are being destroyed with a sledgehammer”. That’s your nonsense, melodramatic mewling.
 
Another song and dance. Your whining was about, “Trump try to **** it up”.

Identify for us how and why, “Trump try to **** it up”.
Articles already did so.

Tariffs
Layoffs
Spending cuts
Uncertainty

These all adversely affect the economy. Trump was handed a good, healthy economy. He’s doing a lot to **** that up.
 
Articles already did so.

Tariffs
Layoffs
Spending cuts
Uncertainty

These all adversely affect the economy. Trump was handed a good, healthy economy. He’s doing a lot to **** that up.
Your articles are opinions from leftist tabloids.

Identify for us how spending cuts to wasteful, bloated, leftist slush funds like USAID will adversely affect the economy.

Identify for us how spending cuts to wasteful, bloated government bureaucracies will adversely affect the economy.
 
How incredibly stupid to think sitting down in the Oval Office on day one would miraculously change everything that needs to be changed, on day one. He started ON DAY ONE to get his Cabinet working on the promises he made. And they are.
The swamp is draining nicely. Egg prices will return to normal when all the dead chickens have been replaced. As our GDP goes up, our inflation will come down. DOGE continues to save us money. On day one, he stopped the stranglehold Biden put on our oil. Oil companies are gearing up to produce again. Countries that have been making fools of us by charging us big tariffs on our goods, while we let them skate into our country, are now telling Trump they want to stop hitting us so hard.
He's keeping his promises.
You might want to concern yourself with your own Muslim UK. In fact, if one of us decided to complain that your posts hurt our feelings, you could find yourself in cuffs tomorrow:



Sweep your own porch...
 
Your articles are opinions from leftist tabloids.

Identify for us how spending cuts to wasteful, bloated, leftist slush funds like USAID will adversely affect the economy.

Identify for us how spending cuts to wasteful, bloated government bureaucracies will adversely affect the economy.
They’re economists, just like your post from Goldman Sachs.

Government spending is part of GDP. Those employees being fired are no longer drawing a paycheck and not spending money. Government used to buy food to ship to poor nations. If they don’t buy it, then the farmers don’t get the income.

This isn’t complicated.
 
They’re economists, just like your post from Goldman Sachs.

Government spending is part of GDP. Those employees being fired are no longer drawing a paycheck and not spending money. Government used to buy food to ship to poor nations. If they don’t buy it, then the farmers don’t get the income.

This isn’t complicated.
Those bloated, government bureaucracies are no longer wasting taxpayer dollars on tranny comic books and queer musicals.

Government has no business buying food that is shipped to Islamic terrorists in places like Gaza.

The government has no business spending $hundreds of millions of dollars on ports in places like Gaza.

This seems too complicated for you.
 
Those bloated, government bureaucracies are no longer wasting taxpayer dollars on tranny comic books and queer musicals.

Government has no business buying food that is shipped to Islamic terrorists in places like Gaza.

The government has no business spending $hundreds of millions of dollars on ports in places like Gaza.
You missed the point.

Your opinion on what they should and shouldn’t do is irrelevant.

The fact is that it’ll affect the economy.
 
15th post
You missed the point.

Your opinion on what they should and shouldn’t do is irrelevant.

The fact is that it’ll affect the economy.
Your “phacts” are hilarious piffle as are your unfounded opinions.

A’splain us how eliminating waste and fraud will negatively affect the economy.
 
Your “phacts” are hilarious piffle as are your unfounded opinions.

A’splain us how eliminating waste and fraud will negatively affect the economy.
Asked and answered.

Government expenditures are a part of GDP.

1740778147835.webp
 
Asked and answered.

Government expenditures are a part of GDP.

View attachment 1084348
I see. Government waste and fraud is part of your requirement for expanding GDP.

What percentage of the GDP is represented by your tranny comic books being sent to foreign nations?

Will we expand the GDP by increasing our worldwide distribution of tranny comic books?
 
I see. Government waste and fraud is part of your requirement for expanding GDP.

What percentage of the GDP is represented by your tranny comic books being sent to foreign nations?

Will we expand the GDP by increasing our worldwide distribution of tranny comic books?
Reducing government spending will reduce GDP.

That’s just a fact.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom