Again, two things: (a) it's not up to the gummint what gets drilled and what doesn't -- oil companies are already sitting on millions of acres of land they have leased and are not developing; it's all about profit.
It's good that you can recite the mewling points so well...
And it's true that oil companies have exploration permits for vast tracts of land, mostly granted under the Bush administration. Despite your chicanery, these are not "leases" but rather exploratory permits.
So why don't they drill? Simple, they don't know where the oil is, which is why they're exploratory. Of course in SOME cases we know exactly where the oil is, such as in ANWR, where the far left, which includes the administration, blocks production of known reserves.
In addition, 72% of the permits are for off-shore wells, which Obama has placed a ban on.
Did Obama Really Take Away Those Oil Leases? - Forbes
So Obama and sheep like you condemn the Oil companies for not drilling when they are prohibited from drilling, by Obama....
So opening up this or that new area in no way guarantees it's going to be exploited -- unless, again, you want to nationalize the oil industry.
And the agenda pops it's head up - SURPRISE, guess what the Obamunists want?
From each according to his ability, to each according the diktats of faceless apparatchiks. (Obamunist Maxim)
And (b) even when those areas are developed, just as the sources being tapped in the present, they go to an international marketplace. There's no such thing as a direct pipeline from our shores to our streets. Doesn't work that way. Never did.
Of course this isn't even close to true.
Crude oil is not generic. The "light sweet" that American refineries are tuned for is significantly different than the heavier crude favored in China.
Sweet crude oil - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
But hey, you just spew the Soros line Pogo, reality has no place in the debate....