That is, unless you of all people have suddenly come up with some kind of evidence of "cheating". Which, if so, why did you hold out until now?
The absence of evidence does not imply evidence is absent.
--- and the burden of proof lies with the asserter. Check your post.
"It coulda happened" is not the same as "it did happen".
Of course, and you are asserting it didn't happen. The burden lies also with you.
NO I AM NOT.
Go ahead, quote me.
Can't find it?
Only one of us has an assertion here. I don't assert unless I can prove, because I don't believe unless I SEE proof.
You are making the contrary argument, Pogo.
You and I both know how to glean information from inferences. And you inferred from the initial quote in this chain that cheating didn't occur.
I would appreciate it if you didn't insult my intelligence.
NO, I made no argument. I prevented you from making one you can't sustain.
I made ZERO claim of a negative. Go ahead, quote where I did.
Btw I can't 'infer' in that moment. Only you can do that.
Your contortions and mental gymnastics are duly noted.
I am nothing if not flexible