PRESIDENT Trump Re-files Texas Court Case

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I suspect the court's response will be even shorter this time.

Maybe you are imagining what your response would be?

Unlike you the Supreme Court has to at least give the appearance that they are interested in
preserving our democracy and preventing it from devolving into a Venezuelan type dictatorship.

But of course you have no interest in that.

(Venezuela, by the way, is where the democrats got their Dominion vote fixing machines from as they were developed and first put into use there. You have to say the left really knows their election stealing business.)

 

[colfax_m]

Unlike you the Supreme Court has to at least give the appearance that they are interested in
preserving our democracy and preventing it from devolving into a Venezuelan type dictatorship.

Yeah, I think preserving the democracy means going with the person who got the most votes and not the runner up because a lot of you feel like he should have won.

 

[ReinyDays]

Just a little nitpick ... SCOTUS only rejected immediate relief in the TX lawsuit ... the case can still be filed but will have to be docketed in the order it was received ... it was ruled that since TX can only file at SCOTUS, SCOTUS must let them file it ...

This nit pick, it’s just wrong. The court ruled there was no standing by Texas because they could not claim they were injured by these other states.

From the ruling:

The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.

I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.

This means TX can file the complaint ... see where it says "grant the motion to file" ... that means TX can file ... "looks like" it would be dismissed under the standing argument ... but that remains to be seen ...

 

[Gdjjr]

Precisely what BOTH sides do every 4 years- as though this time it will be different, because, well because they feel it will even though evidence says differently- SMH- fucking idiots

 

[Gdjjr]

Yeah, I think preserving the democracy means going with the person who got the most votes and not the runner up because a lot of you feel like he should have won.

This is a republic, not a democracy- FYI-a constitutional republic, stupid. Stop relying on talking points to make an invalid argument-

 

[iceberg]

Unlike you the Supreme Court has to at least give the appearance that they are interested in
preserving our democracy and preventing it from devolving into a Venezuelan type dictatorship.

Yeah, I think preserving the democracy means going with the person who got the most votes and not the runner up because a lot of you feel like he should have won.

it's funny how we see a lot of people mad about the election being stolen.

where are the ones mad and protesting they voted for biden and trump is trying to silence them? and please, no standard anti-fa / blm who are mad at everything, where are all the citizens in defense of biden "winning" the election?

 

[mdk]

I suspect the court's response will be even shorter this time.

Maybe you are imagining what your response would be?

Unlike you the Supreme Court has to at least give the appearance that they are interested in
preserving our democracy and preventing it from devolving into a Venezuelan type dictatorship.

But of course you have no interest in that.

Filing the briefs in ALL CAPS this time and stomping your feet harder isn't going make this case turn out any differently. I'm sorry that harsh truth hurts feels and all.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Just a little nitpick ... SCOTUS only rejected immediate relief in the TX lawsuit ... the case can still be filed but will have to be docketed in the order it was received ... it was ruled that since TX can only file at SCOTUS, SCOTUS must let them file it ...

This nit pick, it’s just wrong. The court ruled there was no standing by Texas because they could not claim they were injured by these other states.

From the ruling:

The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.

I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.

This means TX can file the complaint ... see where it says "grant the motion to file" ... that means TX can file ... "looks like" it would be dismissed under the standing argument ... but that remains to be seen ...

That's the dissense. 7 justices denied it.

 

[Thunk]

Yeah, I think preserving the democracy means going with the person who got the most votes

The most LEGAL votes!

Not the thousands of votes from 17 year olds and younger...leave it to the filth to endanger children by conning them into voting illegally!

 

[OldLady]

Trump Approves Filing Retooled Texas-Style Election Challenges: Giuliani


President Donald Trump’s legal team is planning on filing retooled lawsuits, his lawyer said Saturday.

“We move immediately, seamlessly, to plan B, which is to bring lawsuits now in each one of the states. We had them ready. They’re just a version of the one that was brought in the Supreme Court. So last night, the president made the decision,” Rudy Giuliani said during an appearance on “War Room: Pandemic.”

Texas filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan, alleging the elections there were run contrary to the Constitution. The nation’s top court rejected the suit late Friday.

Trump’s team is going to file suits or has already filed in the four states as well as Arizona and Nevada. The suits will incorporate allegations in the complaint filed by Texas.

“If the state doesn’t have standing, surely the president of the United States has standing. And certainly the electors in the states have standing. So they will be bringing those very cases right in those courts, starting today,” Giuliani said. “And let’s see what excuse they can try to use to avoid having a hearing on that.”

Courts have been using the matter of standing to dodge facing the facts, he alleged, adding, “Nobody wants to face the reality that this election was stolen.”

“Not a single court decision has had a hearing yet. They haven’t heard from a single witness. They haven’t looked at a single tape. They haven’t listened to a single recording. There are thousands of them. They haven’t even bothered to look at the tape in Atlanta, Georgia, which is dispositive. It shows an ongoing voter theft of 30,000 votes, enough to change the election.”

Trump Approves Filing Retooled Texas-Style Election Challenges: Giuliani

www.theepochtimes.com

Plan B? More like plan Z....he's had so many cases dismissed.

At this point...I'm sure you don't really believe this nonsense. So why are you posting it?

The Hill reported it Friday.

“The case wasn’t rejected on the merits, the case was rejected on standing. So the answer to that is to bring the case now to the district court by the president, by some of the electors, alleging some of the same facts where there would be standing,” he said in a Friday interview on Newsmax.
“There’s nothing that prevents us from filing these cases immediately in the district court in which the president of course would have standing, some of the electors would have standing in that their constitutional rights have been violated,” he added.
We're not finished,” he concluded. "Believe me.”

Giuliani says Trump team ‘not finished’ after Supreme Court defeat

Rudy Giuliani, President Trump’s personal attorney, indicated the president’s legal team will continue filing lawsuits to subvert the election results even after the Supreme Court shot down an effo…

thehill.com

I'm totally confused. All the states have reached the point where their election results and EC electors can't be challenged, I keep reading, but Trump's team is still filing new suits now in the states' district courts?

 

[colfax_m]

This means TX can file the complaint ... see where it says "grant the motion to file" ... that means TX can file ... "looks like" it would be dismissed under the standing argument ... but that remains to be seen ...

You’re only quoting from the opinion of Alito and Thomas. These two have long standing belief that all complaints in the original jurisdiction docket should be allowed to file.

But since they’re only two out of the nine, their opinions do not matter.

The 7 stated there was no standing and therefore there is no standing to even file. Therefore, the request to file the lawsuit is not allowed.

 

[colfax_m]

The most LEGAL votes!

Yeah, the problem for you guys is that you haven’t been able to show people voted illegally.

Therefore these votes are legal until proven otherwise.

 

[colfax_m]

Unlike you the Supreme Court has to at least give the appearance that they are interested in
preserving our democracy and preventing it from devolving into a Venezuelan type dictatorship.

Yeah, I think preserving the democracy means going with the person who got the most votes and not the runner up because a lot of you feel like he should have won.

it's funny how we see a lot of people mad about the election being stolen.

where are the ones mad and protesting they voted for biden and trump is trying to silence them? and please, no standard anti-fa / blm who are mad at everything, where are all the citizens in defense of biden "winning" the election?

I have no idea and I don’t really care. Trump’s lawsuits (and those of his allies) have failed miserably.

I see no personal need to protest such a pitiful effort.

 

[colfax_m]

Yeah, I think preserving the democracy means going with the person who got the most votes and not the runner up because a lot of you feel like he should have won.

This is a republic, not a democracy- FYI-a constitutional republic, stupid. Stop relying on talking points to make an invalid argument-

Yes, it is a republic. Which is why it’s so disgusting that Texas is trying to take away other state’s votes.

 

[Pogo]

Trump Approves Filing Retooled Texas-Style Election Challenges: Giuliani


President Donald Trump’s legal team is planning on filing retooled lawsuits, his lawyer said Saturday.

“We move immediately, seamlessly, to plan B, which is to bring lawsuits now in each one of the states. We had them ready. They’re just a version of the one that was brought in the Supreme Court. So last night, the president made the decision,” Rudy Giuliani said during an appearance on “War Room: Pandemic.”

Texas filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan, alleging the elections there were run contrary to the Constitution. The nation’s top court rejected the suit late Friday.

Trump’s team is going to file suits or has already filed in the four states as well as Arizona and Nevada. The suits will incorporate allegations in the complaint filed by Texas.

“If the state doesn’t have standing, surely the president of the United States has standing. And certainly the electors in the states have standing. So they will be bringing those very cases right in those courts, starting today,” Giuliani said. “And let’s see what excuse they can try to use to avoid having a hearing on that.”

Courts have been using the matter of standing to dodge facing the facts, he alleged, adding, “Nobody wants to face the reality that this election was stolen.”

“Not a single court decision has had a hearing yet. They haven’t heard from a single witness. They haven’t looked at a single tape. They haven’t listened to a single recording. There are thousands of them. They haven’t even bothered to look at the tape in Atlanta, Georgia, which is dispositive. It shows an ongoing voter theft of 30,000 votes, enough to change the election.”

Trump Approves Filing Retooled Texas-Style Election Challenges: Giuliani

www.theepochtimes.com

I hope Rooty didn't do this spiel from the garage door at Four Seasons Total Landscaping again. At least move to the porn shop.

 

[Pogo]

“the epoch times”

lol

“The Epoch Times” reports on Trump’s flatulence and calls it air freshener.

The Epoch Times is a Chinese cult rag.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Filing the briefs in ALL CAPS this time and stomping your feet harder isn't going make this case turn out any differently. I'm sorry that harsh truth hurts feels and all.

What makes you think this latest brief was filled out entirely in caps? Odd where your mind goes for refuge.
The foot stomping bit was just juvenile and idiotic.

And the last brief was rejected on a matter of jurisdiction. As if Texas, as one of the fifty states, had no interest in making sure the presidential election was not hijacked and the country was stolen (wild eye rolling).
Of course YOU are happy to see America morph into Cuba or Venezuela, but the Supreme Court cannot
be that blatant.

This time actual residents of Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania are plaintiffs in the suit...so let's see how SCOTUS worms out of this dilemma. They might actually have to do something about the theft of America. Wow!

 

[Sunsettommy]

Alito already noted that while he would have allowed the suit to be filed he wasn't going to rule for those who did.

If you don't have Alito you have zero chances. It does provide more time to raise money from the suckers though.

I think Alioto will change his mind on this latest lawsuit frenzy, as it has already been exhausted in various states with 100% failure rate.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Trump Approves Filing Retooled Texas-Style Election Challenges: Giuliani


President Donald Trump’s legal team is planning on filing retooled lawsuits, his lawyer said Saturday.

“We move immediately, seamlessly, to plan B, which is to bring lawsuits now in each one of the states. We had them ready. They’re just a version of the one that was brought in the Supreme Court. So last night, the president made the decision,” Rudy Giuliani said during an appearance on “War Room: Pandemic.”

Texas filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan, alleging the elections there were run contrary to the Constitution. The nation’s top court rejected the suit late Friday.

Trump’s team is going to file suits or has already filed in the four states as well as Arizona and Nevada. The suits will incorporate allegations in the complaint filed by Texas.

“If the state doesn’t have standing, surely the president of the United States has standing. And certainly the electors in the states have standing. So they will be bringing those very cases right in those courts, starting today,” Giuliani said. “And let’s see what excuse they can try to use to avoid having a hearing on that.”

Courts have been using the matter of standing to dodge facing the facts, he alleged, adding, “Nobody wants to face the reality that this election was stolen.”

“Not a single court decision has had a hearing yet. They haven’t heard from a single witness. They haven’t looked at a single tape. They haven’t listened to a single recording. There are thousands of them. They haven’t even bothered to look at the tape in Atlanta, Georgia, which is dispositive. It shows an ongoing voter theft of 30,000 votes, enough to change the election.”

Trump Approves Filing Retooled Texas-Style Election Challenges: Giuliani

www.theepochtimes.com

Plan B? More like plan Z....he's had so many cases dismissed.

At this point...I'm sure you don't really believe this nonsense. So why are you posting it?

No, its plan 9 from outer space!

 

[mdk]

Filing the briefs in ALL CAPS this time and stomping your feet harder isn't going make this case turn out any differently. I'm sorry that harsh truth hurts feels and all.

What makes you think this latest brief was filled out entirely in caps? Odd where your mind goes for refuge.
The foot stomping bit was just juvenile and idiotic.

And the last brief was rejected for a matter of jurisdiction. As if Texas, as one of the fifty states, had no interest in making sure the presidential election was not hijacked and the country was stolen (wild eye rolling).

This time actual residents of Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania are plaintiffs in the suit...so let's see how SCOTUS worms out of this dilemma. They might actually have to do something about the theft of America. Wow!

I can’t wait to see what delusional response you’ll have when they don’t offer the relief you seek...again.