President Trump orders attack on Venezuelan drug runners at sea

You’d guess wrong, as usual.


If it was proven to your satisfaction that they were drug runners, would you care, or still take the anti-American position on this incident?
 
I guess I prefer boarding to bombing.


Question, do you think that we as a nation have the right to use force to defend ourselves from the flow of drugs that are killing us by the hundreds of thousands?
 
President Trump orders attack on Venezuelan drug runners at sea

And our forces did just that.

See the President message, below with the video.

It is a meaningful start toward the objective of making drug dealers reconsider their life choices. At least that crew won’t be doing it again.



View attachment 1157648
Dangerous precedent legally and otherwise. What say you - oh supposed great legal mind?
 
Question, do you think that we as a nation have the right to use force to defend ourselves from the flow of drugs that are killing us by the hundreds of thousands?
What’s wrong with boarding? Maybe people onboard had info on future events that could be useful. Intel was wasted for convenience.
 
What’s wrong with boarding? Maybe people onboard had info on future events that could be useful. Intel was wasted for convenience.

Boarding a terrorist ship is a big risk for the sailors you ask to do it.

If its considered unlikely that anyone important is onboard, makes better sense to just sink them.

Of course, the libs are hoping for casualties they can "blame Trump" for, so its no risk to them at all.
 
I guess I prefer boarding to bombing.
You prefer banging away at your keyboard while others accept the risk of taking action.

You’re the hero of message board tough guys.
 
Boarding a terrorist ship is a big risk for the sailors you ask to do it.
If its considered unlikely that anyone important is onboard, makes better sense to just sink them.
In this case, the CG tried to get the boat to stop so they could board it.
They ran.
Federal laws says the CG can shoot the fleeing vessel.


 
What’s wrong with boarding? Maybe people onboard had info on future events that could be useful. Intel was wasted for convenience.

Or maybe they didn't and it would have been a waster of time.
 
What’s wrong with boarding? Maybe people onboard had info on future events that could be useful. Intel was wasted for convenience.
It's puts Americans lives at risk. Why do you want to put Americans lives at risk?
 
Just be honest. You’re incensed that President Tump is as’plodin’ your drug trafficking heroes.
Oh I've seen this one before, this is exactly what Duterte (ex president of the Philippines) said before he killed a bunch of drug dealers, some of which were coincidentally his political opponents
 
15th post
Oh I've seen this one before, this is exactly what Duterte (ex president of the Philippines) said before he killed a bunch of drug dealers, some of which were coincidentally his political opponents
If you get in to politics it’s best to give up the drug game
 
Oh I've seen this one before, this is exactly what Duterte (ex president of the Philippines) said before he killed a bunch of drug dealers, some of which were coincidentally his political opponents
I see. You think the drug runners were democrat hopefuls who would challenge Republicans in tbe mid-terms?
 
I guess I prefer boarding to bombing.
How has that policy been working for you?

1757095019605.webp
 
I think capture and boarding would have served us better and establish exactly what we are trying to do. If the purpose was to send a message, I guess it did that, Mexico and Colombia and Asscrackistan now know that we only support controllable importers. Everything is on the table except some transparency; I think that didn't make it.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom