President to use Executive Powers to do Environmental agenda!!!

[skookerasbil]

Obama Making Plans to Use Executive Power - NYTimes.com


Geee...............what a suprise!!!


Now since the "man-made" global warming hoax has been fully exposed and has ZERO chance of making it through congress, the president is going to make sure he appeases his k00k base and go slam the middle class with gigantic taxes and destroy even more jobs!!!!


Wait 'till folks in the Northeast see their electric bills now!!!!

Gotta say one thing for this guy..............he's got balls!!!!!


Personally? I hope he goes for it..............and makes 100% certain that a lefty radical does not sit in the White House for at least 2 generations!!!!


You think you people have seen tea parties????? Ohhhhhhhhhhh..............wait'll you get a load of them now!!!!!!

 

[rightwinger]

Thank you President Obama. "We the People" elected you to do a job. Use whatever powers you have to get it done

 

[Ame®icano]

Thank you President Obama. "We the People" elected you to do a job. Use whatever powers you have to get it done

The end justify the means, right?

 

[skookerasbil]

Thank you President Obama. "We the People" elected you to do a job. Use whatever powers you have to get it done

Amen to that s0n...........whatever it takes to ramp up the revolvution!!!

Within 3 years, all regular Americans will know well the meaning of the bumper sticker, "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder!!"

 

[Annie]

Thank you President Obama. "We the People" elected you to do a job. Use whatever powers you have to get it done

Just follow the money:

Climategate, UK Edition: Following the Money, All ?4 Trillion of It - Big Journalism

...But hard-core warmists, intent on skepticizing the skeptics, invariably ask: “why would the media go along with this poppycock?”
Yes, why are the media so invested in the warming notion, given the countervailing evidence, the fact that the last climate theory (the global cooling scare of the 1970s) was so quickly disproven, and that it is self-evident that CO2, that most persecuted of molecules, is essential for life… for plant life. (When an elephant sighs, a tree smiles.)



Well, the BBC, a prime proponents of warming theory, or AGW, has heavily invested its pension fund in the theory, and thus have had a major non-Scientific reason for their bias. As revealed this weekend in The Express [6]:

The corporation is under investigation after being inundated with complaints that its editorial coverage of climate change is biased in favour of those who say it is a man-made phenomenon. The £8billion pension fund is likely to come under close scrutiny over its commitment to promote a low-carbon economy while struggling to reverse an estimated £2billion deficit. Concerns are growing that BBC journalists and their bosses regard disputed scientific theory that climate change is caused by mankind as “mainstream” while huge sums of employees’ money is invested in companies whose success depends on the theory being widely accepted. The BBC is the only media organisation in Britain whose pension fund is a member of the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, which has more than 50 members across Europe.

The IIGCC is an interesting group. As their website explains [7]:

The IIGCC is a forum for collaboration on climate change for European investors. The group’s objective is to catalyse greater investment in a low carbon economy by bringing investors together to use their collective influence with companies, policymakers and investors. The group currently has over 50 members, including some of the largest pension funds and asset managers in Europe, and represents assets of around €4 trillion.

Wait… I hate to be a skeptic, but did they just say… “Four Trillion Euros”?

They did.

The Chairman of IIGCC investment group is Peter Dunscombe, who also happens to be the BBC’s Head of Pensions Investment.

Cui bono, my friend, cui bono?

Then there are a few admissions:

...Did anyone else just hear the “bump-bump” of the Jones bus running right over the infamous Hockey Stick?

Dr. Phil Jones, the man at the center of the Climategate scandal, has for the first time admitted that the Medieval Warm Period could have been warmer than the present day, flying directly in the face of the stupid Hocleystick Graph that caused so much of the Climate panic in the first place. From the BBC report, titled “Climate data ‘not well organised“:

Phil Jones, the professor behind the “Climategate” affair, has admitted some of his decades-old weather data was not well enough organised.

He said this contributed to his refusal to share raw data with critics – a decision he says he regretted.

But Professor Jones said he had not cheated the data, or unfairly influenced the scientific process.

He said he stood by the view that recent climate warming was most likely predominantly man-made.

But he agreed that two periods in recent times had experienced similar warming. And he agreed that the debate had not been settled over whether the Medieval Warm Period was warmer than the current period.​

Here is why that is important. If there was a warmer Medieval Warm Period, then the current warming could be more likely due to natural variation, instead of CO2 and man-made. as the models don’t account for this earlier warmer condition. At the very least, the “certainty” and of doom and gloom warming predictions is overstated, as the world may have been warmer and the world didn’t end.

 

[skookerasbil]

Thank you President Obama. "We the People" elected you to do a job. Use whatever powers you have to get it done

Just follow the money:

Climategate, UK Edition: Following the Money, All ?4 Trillion of It - Big Journalism

...But hard-core warmists, intent on skepticizing the skeptics, invariably ask: “why would the media go along with this poppycock?”
Yes, why are the media so invested in the warming notion, given the countervailing evidence, the fact that the last climate theory (the global cooling scare of the 1970s) was so quickly disproven, and that it is self-evident that CO2, that most persecuted of molecules, is essential for life… for plant life. (When an elephant sighs, a tree smiles.)



Well, the BBC, a prime proponents of warming theory, or AGW, has heavily invested its pension fund in the theory, and thus have had a major non-Scientific reason for their bias. As revealed this weekend in The Express [6]:

The corporation is under investigation after being inundated with complaints that its editorial coverage of climate change is biased in favour of those who say it is a man-made phenomenon. The £8billion pension fund is likely to come under close scrutiny over its commitment to promote a low-carbon economy while struggling to reverse an estimated £2billion deficit. Concerns are growing that BBC journalists and their bosses regard disputed scientific theory that climate change is caused by mankind as “mainstream” while huge sums of employees’ money is invested in companies whose success depends on the theory being widely accepted. The BBC is the only media organisation in Britain whose pension fund is a member of the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, which has more than 50 members across Europe.

The IIGCC is an interesting group. As their website explains [7]:

The IIGCC is a forum for collaboration on climate change for European investors. The group’s objective is to catalyse greater investment in a low carbon economy by bringing investors together to use their collective influence with companies, policymakers and investors. The group currently has over 50 members, including some of the largest pension funds and asset managers in Europe, and represents assets of around €4 trillion.

Wait… I hate to be a skeptic, but did they just say… “Four Trillion Euros”?

They did.

The Chairman of IIGCC investment group is Peter Dunscombe, who also happens to be the BBC’s Head of Pensions Investment.

Cui bono, my friend, cui bono?

Then there are a few admissions:

...Did anyone else just hear the “bump-bump” of the Jones bus running right over the infamous Hockey Stick?

Dr. Phil Jones, the man at the center of the Climategate scandal, has for the first time admitted that the Medieval Warm Period could have been warmer than the present day, flying directly in the face of the stupid Hocleystick Graph that caused so much of the Climate panic in the first place. From the BBC report, titled “Climate data ‘not well organised“:

Phil Jones, the professor behind the “Climategate” affair, has admitted some of his decades-old weather data was not well enough organised.

He said this contributed to his refusal to share raw data with critics – a decision he says he regretted.

But Professor Jones said he had not cheated the data, or unfairly influenced the scientific process.

He said he stood by the view that recent climate warming was most likely predominantly man-made.

But he agreed that two periods in recent times had experienced similar warming. And he agreed that the debate had not been settled over whether the Medieval Warm Period was warmer than the current period.​

Here is why that is important. If there was a warmer Medieval Warm Period, then the current warming could be more likely due to natural variation, instead of CO2 and man-made. as the models don’t account for this earlier warmer condition. At the very least, the “certainty” and of doom and gloom warming predictions is overstated, as the world may have been warmer and the world didn’t end.

Annie pwns the k00ks!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Kex]

Thank you President Obama. "We the People" elected you to do a job. Use whatever powers you have to get it done

The end justify the means, right?

Always.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Thank you President Obama. "We the People" elected you to do a job. Use whatever powers you have to get it done

You need a King. Maybe Emperor?

 

[Ame®icano]

Thank you President Obama. "We the People" elected you to do a job. Use whatever powers you have to get it done

You need a King. Maybe Emperor?

Rather a doctor.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Can a President "Executive Power" himself the funds to pay for his Executive Power-grab?

 

[LibocalypseNow]

How many Executive Orders is this guy up to? He has behaved like a Dictator since day one in my opinion. How many Executive Orders did he sign in just his first week in office? The Republicans need to take some power back real soon. It's time for some Checks & Balances on this guy. He's a perfect example of absolute power corrupting absolutely.

 

[Kex]

How many Executive Orders is this guy up to? He has behaved like a Dictator since day one in my opinion. How many Executive Orders did he sign in just his first week in office? The Republicans need to take some power back real soon. It's time for some Checks & Balances on this guy. He's a perfect example of absolute power corrupting absolutely.

You tell me and then do your homework and check his predecessors.

 

[Conspiracist]

How many Executive Orders is this guy up to? He has behaved like a Dictator since day one in my opinion. How many Executive Orders did he sign in just his first week in office? The Republicans need to take some power back real soon. It's time for some Checks & Balances on this guy. He's a perfect example of absolute power corrupting absolutely.

39 in 2009 and 3 so far in 2010

 

[CMike]

Thank you President Obama. "We the People" elected you to do a job. Use whatever powers you have to get it done

You need a King. Maybe Emperor?

I think it's their Golden Calf.

 

[Conspiracist]

Administration of George W. Bush (2001-2009)
Disposition of Executive orders signed by President George W. Bush:

Subject Index


2009 - E.O. 13484 - E.O. 13488 (5 Executive orders issued)
2008 - E.O. 13454 - E.O. 13483 (30 Executive orders issued)
2007 - E.O. 13422 - E.O. 13453 (31 Executive orders issued)
2006 - E.O. 13395 - E.O. 13421 (27 Executive orders issued)
2005 - E.O. 13369 - E.O. 13394 (26 Executive orders issued)
2004 - E.O. 13324 - E.O. 13368 (45 Executive orders issued)
2003 - E.O. 13283 - E.O. 13323 (41 Executive orders issued)
2002 - E.O. 13252 - E.O. 13282 (31 Executive orders issued)
2001 - E.O. 13198 - E.O. 13251 (54 Executive orders issued)

 

[CMike]

Obama and the democrats should remember what is lurking the next election.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOqk_q4NLLI]YouTube - Twisted Sister - We're Not Gonna Take It with lyrics[/ame]

 

[Kex]

Administration of George W. Bush (2001-2009)
Disposition of Executive orders signed by President George W. Bush:

Subject Index


2009 - E.O. 13484 - E.O. 13488 (5 Executive orders issued)
2008 - E.O. 13454 - E.O. 13483 (30 Executive orders issued)
2007 - E.O. 13422 - E.O. 13453 (31 Executive orders issued)
2006 - E.O. 13395 - E.O. 13421 (27 Executive orders issued)
2005 - E.O. 13369 - E.O. 13394 (26 Executive orders issued)
2004 - E.O. 13324 - E.O. 13368 (45 Executive orders issued)
2003 - E.O. 13283 - E.O. 13323 (41 Executive orders issued)
2002 - E.O. 13252 - E.O. 13282 (31 Executive orders issued)
2001 - E.O. 13198 - E.O. 13251 (54 Executive orders issued)

Reagan- 480 executive orders. So lets average it, 80 per year. Obama a whooping 39, what a dictator! The second coming of Mao! Marxist I tell ya!

Edit: I admit I suck at math, it is 60. Still.

 

[potter 58]

We warned the wingnuts that Bush's abuse of E.O.'s would would come back and bite them the ass and it sure as hell did

 

[Conspiracist]

Link to Bush EO's

George W. Bush Executive Orders Disposition Tables


Link to the Obamanator EO's


Barack Obama Executive Orders Disposition Tables

 

[rightwinger]

Go for it Obama...

Use Executive Orders the way Republicans use fillibusters. It is the way business is conducted in Washington these days