President Obama scolds CBS reporter

[Ernie S.]

is anyone trying to claim that question was anything other than an attack?

Any questioning of the deal leader is an attack! That reporter should be sent for reeducation at once! I'll bet he even dared to look the deal leader directly in the eye when speaking to him!!!!!!!

Ogiboo----it was a fair question------it was a press conference ----not afternoon tea with the duchess

not the way it was asked. that was an attack. you know that. you can't honestly think phrasing it that way was fair or unbiased.

I posted a link to the article with a video above. Use your judgment, such as it is.
I suppose obama was mostly flummoxed because it was Garrett and not a FOX reporter that asked the question. I guess he felt betrayed.

 

[Penelope]

Lets see Obama values life and not war, but the neocons don't, and the neocons would just as soon bomb them along with the rest of the Iranians.

To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran

By JOHN R. BOLTONMARCH 26, 2015

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/26/opinion/to-stop-irans-bomb-bomb-iran.html?_r=0

 

[rightwinger]

If Obama had gotten the Hostages released as part of this deal, would Republicans be calling it an arms for hostages deal?

 

[ogibillm]

is anyone trying to claim that question was anything other than an attack?

Any questioning of the deal leader is an attack! That reporter should be sent for reeducation at once! I'll bet he even dared to look the deal leader directly in the eye when speaking to him!!!!!!!

Ogiboo----it was a fair question------it was a press conference ----not afternoon tea with the duchess

not the way it was asked. that was an attack. you know that. you can't honestly think phrasing it that way was fair or unbiased.

I posted a link to the article with a video above. Use your judgment, such as it is.
I suppose obama was mostly flummoxed because it was Garrett and not a FOX reporter that asked the question. I guess he felt betrayed.

i've seen it. the president handled it well.

 

[ogibillm]

Lets see Obama values life and not war, but the neocons don't, and the neocons would just as soon bomb them along with the rest of the Iranians.

To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran

By JOHN R. BOLTONMARCH 26, 2015

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/26/opinion/to-stop-irans-bomb-bomb-iran.html?_r=0

well yeah, but before you drop bombs on them you make sure they give back the prisoners

 

[rightwinger]

is anyone trying to claim that question was anything other than an attack?

Any questioning of the deal leader is an attack! That reporter should be sent for reeducation at once! I'll bet he even dared to look the deal leader directly in the eye when speaking to him!!!!!!!

Ogiboo----it was a fair question------it was a press conference ----not afternoon tea with the duchess

A fair question would have been
What are you doing about the hostage release
Did you attempt to get a hostage release as part of this deal?

To imply that the president somehow condones their capture or is celebrating while they suffer was out of line

 

[irosie91]

is anyone trying to claim that question was anything other than an attack?

Any questioning of the deal leader is an attack! That reporter should be sent for reeducation at once! I'll bet he even dared to look the deal leader directly in the eye when speaking to him!!!!!!!

Ogiboo----it was a fair question------it was a press conference ----not afternoon tea with the duchess

A fair question would have been
What are you doing about the hostage release
Did you attempt to get a hostage release as part of this deal?

To imply that the president somehow condones their capture or is celebrating while they suffer was out of line

it was slightly hostile--------it was a press conference-----the man was
expressing a kind of general hostility to the CELEBRATORY response
Obama exhibited-----vitually pounding on his chest

 

[Zoom-boing]

Garrett shouldn't have used the word "content", that was his mistake.

Having said that, obama cherry picked that term out of the questions, scolded Garrett, then never did answer the question.

Typical obutthead.

 

[irosie91]

Garrett shouldn't have used the word "content", that was his mistake.

Having said that, obama cherry picked that term out of the questions, scolded Garrett, then never did answer the question.

Typical obutthead.

good point-----Obama took advantage of the opportunity to
GRANDSTAND-------whilst the prisoners----could have been
watching their betrayal. However----Obama probably regrets
his response

 

[Ernie S.]

is anyone trying to claim that question was anything other than an attack?

Any questioning of the deal leader is an attack! That reporter should be sent for reeducation at once! I'll bet he even dared to look the deal leader directly in the eye when speaking to him!!!!!!!

Ogiboo----it was a fair question------it was a press conference ----not afternoon tea with the duchess

not the way it was asked. that was an attack. you know that. you can't honestly think phrasing it that way was fair or unbiased.

I posted a link to the article with a video above. Use your judgment, such as it is.
I suppose obama was mostly flummoxed because it was Garrett and not a FOX reporter that asked the question. I guess he felt betrayed.

i've seen it. the president handled it well.

Of course you'd think that.
I purposely linked to the video on Huff Po so you could read your daily talking points while you were there.

 

[rightwinger]

is anyone trying to claim that question was anything other than an attack?

Any questioning of the deal leader is an attack! That reporter should be sent for reeducation at once! I'll bet he even dared to look the deal leader directly in the eye when speaking to him!!!!!!!

Ogiboo----it was a fair question------it was a press conference ----not afternoon tea with the duchess

A fair question would have been
What are you doing about the hostage release
Did you attempt to get a hostage release as part of this deal?

To imply that the president somehow condones their capture or is celebrating while they suffer was out of line

it was slightly hostile--------it was a press conference-----the man was
expressing a kind of general hostility to the CELEBRATORY response
Obama exhibited-----vitually pounding on his chest

Obamas response was slightly hostile

I have yet to see anything close to celebration outside of stating the merits of the deal

 

[ogibillm]

is anyone trying to claim that question was anything other than an attack?

Any questioning of the deal leader is an attack! That reporter should be sent for reeducation at once! I'll bet he even dared to look the deal leader directly in the eye when speaking to him!!!!!!!

Ogiboo----it was a fair question------it was a press conference ----not afternoon tea with the duchess

A fair question would have been
What are you doing about the hostage release
Did you attempt to get a hostage release as part of this deal?

To imply that the president somehow condones their capture or is celebrating while they suffer was out of line

it was slightly hostile--------it was a press conference-----the man was
expressing a kind of general hostility to the CELEBRATORY response
Obama exhibited-----vitually pounding on his chest

so he could have asked that question - is it appropriate to celebrate the deal while the prisoners are still being held?

instead he chose to phrase the question not just as if the president was content with their situation but that he was also somehow betraying the conscience of the nation.

 

[ogibillm]

Any questioning of the deal leader is an attack! That reporter should be sent for reeducation at once! I'll bet he even dared to look the deal leader directly in the eye when speaking to him!!!!!!!

Ogiboo----it was a fair question------it was a press conference ----not afternoon tea with the duchess

not the way it was asked. that was an attack. you know that. you can't honestly think phrasing it that way was fair or unbiased.

I posted a link to the article with a video above. Use your judgment, such as it is.
I suppose obama was mostly flummoxed because it was Garrett and not a FOX reporter that asked the question. I guess he felt betrayed.

i've seen it. the president handled it well.

Of course you'd think that.
I purposely linked to the video on Huff Po so you could read your daily talking points while you were there.

and of course you would think he didn't.
it was a legit question asked in a biased manner. garrett deserved the smack down he got.

 

[Unkotare]

Ogiboo----it was a fair question------it was a press conference ----not afternoon tea with the duchess

not the way it was asked. that was an attack. you know that. you can't honestly think phrasing it that way was fair or unbiased.

I posted a link to the article with a video above. Use your judgment, such as it is.
I suppose obama was mostly flummoxed because it was Garrett and not a FOX reporter that asked the question. I guess he felt betrayed.

i've seen it. the president handled it well.

Of course you'd think that.
I purposely linked to the video on Huff Po so you could read your daily talking points while you were there.

and of course you would think he didn't.
it was a legit question asked in a biased manner. garrett deserved the smack down he got.

You were born in the wrong place at the wrong time.

 

[warf]

There seems to be this right wing idea that if something doesn't cover every single problem existing then it's no good.

The Iran nuke deal is about nukes. It's not about hostages, terrorism or anything but nukes.

If one can't understand that it's not Obama's fault.

 

[irosie91]

There seems to be this right wing idea that if something doesn't cover every single problem existing then it's no good.

The Iran nuke deal is about nukes. It's not about hostages, terrorism or anything but nukes.

If one can't understand that it's not Obama's fault.

Negotiations are CIRCUMSCRIBED by law? ------there was an
agreement that no other issues be introduced?-------I do not see
your pointless point

 

[Ernie S.]

not the way it was asked. that was an attack. you know that. you can't honestly think phrasing it that way was fair or unbiased.

I posted a link to the article with a video above. Use your judgment, such as it is.
I suppose obama was mostly flummoxed because it was Garrett and not a FOX reporter that asked the question. I guess he felt betrayed.

i've seen it. the president handled it well.

Of course you'd think that.
I purposely linked to the video on Huff Po so you could read your daily talking points while you were there.

and of course you would think he didn't.
it was a legit question asked in a biased manner. garrett deserved the smack down he got.

You were born in the wrong place at the wrong time.

It was a legitimate question ask of an impertinent child who threw a tantrum.

 

[Penelope]

Like the other poster said, this news conference was not about anything but the nuclear deal and sanctions. the other 5 countries and IAEA is not involved in the US prisoners in Iran. That is a separate issue altogether, its like putting pork into the bills that then get vetoed and we wonder why.

 

[rightwinger]

I posted a link to the article with a video above. Use your judgment, such as it is.
I suppose obama was mostly flummoxed because it was Garrett and not a FOX reporter that asked the question. I guess he felt betrayed.

i've seen it. the president handled it well.

Of course you'd think that.
I purposely linked to the video on Huff Po so you could read your daily talking points while you were there.

and of course you would think he didn't.
it was a legit question asked in a biased manner. garrett deserved the smack down he got.

You were born in the wrong place at the wrong time.

It was a legitimate question ask of an impertinent child who threw a tantrum.

It was an impertinent question responded in a pertinent way
To imply that the president does not care about hostages because of this deal was out of bounds

 

[irosie91]

Like the other poster said, this news conference was not about anything but the nuclear deal and sanctions. the other 5 countries and IAEA is not involved in the US prisoners in Iran. That is a separate issue altogether, its like putting pork into the bills that then get vetoed and we wonder why.

el presidente----did not say----"another issue for another day"-----he got hysterical and did a GRANDSTAND routine

i've seen it. the president handled it well.

Of course you'd think that.
I purposely linked to the video on Huff Po so you could read your daily talking points while you were there.

and of course you would think he didn't.
it was a legit question asked in a biased manner. garrett deserved the smack down he got.

You were born in the wrong place at the wrong time.

It was a legitimate question ask of an impertinent child who threw a tantrum.

It was an impertinent question responded in a pertinent way
To imply that the president does not care about hostages because of this deal was out of bounds

celebration of a lousy agreement with Iran which will serve only to
EMBOLDEN its perverse ambitions-----was far more "impertinent"