Post the Law or Regulation that...

[g5000]

I can’t believe what our country is doing. Qaddafi in Libya is killing thousands of people, nobody knows how bad it is, and we’re sitting around, we have soldiers all have the Middle East, and we’re not bringing them in to stop this horrible carnage and that’s what it is: It’s a carnage.

You talk about things that have happened in history; this could be one of the worst. Now we should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives. This is absolutely nuts. We don’t want to get involved and you’re gonna end up with something like you’ve never seen before.

Now, ultimately, the people will appreciate it. They're gonna end up taking over the country eventually, but the people will appreciate it, and they should pay us back.

But we have go in to save these lives; these people are being slaughtered like animals. It’s horrible what’s going on; it has to be stopped.

We should do on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and save the lives.

- Donald J. Trump can’t believe what our country is doing. Qaddafi in Libya is killing thousands of people, nobody knows how bad it is, and we’re sitting around, we have soldiers all have the Middle East, and we’re not bringing them in to stop this horrible carnage and that’s what it is: It’s a carnage.

You talk about things that have happened in history; this could be one of the worst. Now we should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives. This is absolutely nuts. We don’t want to get involved and you’re gonna end up with something like you’ve never seen before.

Now, ultimately, the people will appreciate it. They're gonna end up taking over the country eventually, but the people will appreciate it, and they should pay us back.

But we have go in to save these lives; these people are being slaughtered like animals. It’s horrible what’s going on; it has to be stopped.

We should do on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and save the lives.

- Donald J. Trump can’t believe what our country is doing. Qaddafi in Libya is killing thousands of people, nobody knows how bad it is, and we’re sitting around, we have soldiers all have the Middle East, and we’re not bringing them in to stop this horrible carnage and that’s what it is: It’s a carnage.

You talk about things that have happened in history; this could be one of the worst. Now we should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives. This is absolutely nuts. We don’t want to get involved and you’re gonna end up with something like you’ve never seen before.

Now, ultimately, the people will appreciate it. They're gonna end up taking over the country eventually, but the people will appreciate it, and they should pay us back.

But we have go in to save these lives; these people are being slaughtered like animals. It’s horrible what’s going on; it has to be stopped.

We should do on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and save the lives.

- Donald J. Trump

 

[easyt65]

The code found on several liberal PCs, which does not prove successful Russian hacking, is out-dated Ukrainian code that can currently be downloaded off the internet and used by anyone.

 

[g5000]

https://buzzfeed-video1.s3.amazonaws.com/video/2016/01/19/FromTheDeskOfDonaldTrump2-28-624x350.mp4

 

[g5000]

The code found on several liberal PCs, which does not prove successful Russian hacking, is out-dated Ukrainian code that can currently be downloaded off the internet and used by anyone.

The malware fed back to servers used by the Russian intelligence services, retard.

 

[Moonglow]

Chapter I, Article 2, paragraph 7 of the United Nations Charter prohibits one country from ******* with the internal matters of another country that are within the jurisdiction of that country.

You're welcome.

No one did any such thing. Assange insists the hack was an inside job and NO ONE has shown any evidence it was not.

He has yet to prove that it was, which makes such information questionable of intent...

Assange is the person who released the info, right?

Is Assange Russian?

Prove the connection between him and the Russians.

Do you always jump the gun before the land run?
To tell you the truth, until verification can be obtained..I wouldn't trust the info..

 

[g5000]

It is highly amusing one of the biggest rubes of propaganda outlets on this forum is now doing backbends to protect Putin.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I can’t believe what our country is doing. Qaddafi in Libya is killing thousands of people, nobody knows how bad it is, and we’re sitting around, we have soldiers all have the Middle East, and we’re not bringing them in to stop this horrible carnage and that’s what it is: It’s a carnage.

You talk about things that have happened in history; this could be one of the worst. Now we should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives. This is absolutely nuts. We don’t want to get involved and you’re gonna end up with something like you’ve never seen before.

Now, ultimately, the people will appreciate it. They're gonna end up taking over the country eventually, but the people will appreciate it, and they should pay us back.

But we have go in to save these lives; these people are being slaughtered like animals. It’s horrible what’s going on; it has to be stopped.

We should do on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and save the lives.

- Donald J. Trump can’t believe what our country is doing. Qaddafi in Libya is killing thousands of people, nobody knows how bad it is, and we’re sitting around, we have soldiers all have the Middle East, and we’re not bringing them in to stop this horrible carnage and that’s what it is: It’s a carnage.

You talk about things that have happened in history; this could be one of the worst. Now we should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives. This is absolutely nuts. We don’t want to get involved and you’re gonna end up with something like you’ve never seen before.

Now, ultimately, the people will appreciate it. They're gonna end up taking over the country eventually, but the people will appreciate it, and they should pay us back.

But we have go in to save these lives; these people are being slaughtered like animals. It’s horrible what’s going on; it has to be stopped.

We should do on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and save the lives.

- Donald J. Trump can’t believe what our country is doing. Qaddafi in Libya is killing thousands of people, nobody knows how bad it is, and we’re sitting around, we have soldiers all have the Middle East, and we’re not bringing them in to stop this horrible carnage and that’s what it is: It’s a carnage.

You talk about things that have happened in history; this could be one of the worst. Now we should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives. This is absolutely nuts. We don’t want to get involved and you’re gonna end up with something like you’ve never seen before.

Now, ultimately, the people will appreciate it. They're gonna end up taking over the country eventually, but the people will appreciate it, and they should pay us back.

But we have go in to save these lives; these people are being slaughtered like animals. It’s horrible what’s going on; it has to be stopped.

We should do on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and save the lives.

- Donald J. Trump

So it was ok to bomb another Country and cause the death of it's leader , it is ok to interfere witha referendum on wheter a Country will maintain ties with other Countries, it is ok to interfere by pumping money to opponents of a leader in national election, it is ok to threaten a Sovereign Government with military action if it does not bend to our will and ok to arm and bomb a sovereign nation, but damn some civilian hacks a DNC computer and with absolutely no evidence we can blame the Russians and threaten them.

 

[Moonglow]

Still waiting........ It is neither illegal or immoral to post or provide information against a political party or candidate by 3rd parties. There is no law preventing this from happening. The Russians can IN FACT provide information to a third party in the US and that party can release that information. But while we talk about the Russians there is NO actual evidence they provided any information on Hillary Clinton, in fact all the intel says that an OPEN SOURCE code once used by the Russians and now available to ANYONE with an internet connection was used to hack the DNC. And then the intel agencies REFUSED to provide Congress with information about the Intel claims they had proof the Russians hacked the DNC.

It is also information which can't be verified, so it falls under ethical dilemmas...

Sure it can if the people that control the emails want to claim it was false they can release the emails. Failure to do so proves the information is actually truthful.

Not necessarily.....It is upon the accuser to supplement evidence...

Wrong, the leak can only be proven false by the original document. The leaker has no way to prove it other then the refusal of the original to release.

Then it would never be considerable applicable as evidence in a court of law...It would be considered hearsay..

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The code found on several liberal PCs, which does not prove successful Russian hacking, is out-dated Ukrainian code that can currently be downloaded off the internet and used by anyone.

The malware fed back to servers used by the Russian intelligence services, retard.

Really? That is in fact NOT stated in the report nor was it reported in the files given to Congress. Perhaps you can link to this claim?

 

[Moonglow]

It is highly amusing one of the biggest rubes of propaganda outlets on this forum is now doing backbends to protect Putin.

I have a yuge amount of quandary as to why these people are doing this..Which casts more suspicion upon the information released..

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Still waiting........ It is neither illegal or immoral to post or provide information against a political party or candidate by 3rd parties. There is no law preventing this from happening. The Russians can IN FACT provide information to a third party in the US and that party can release that information. But while we talk about the Russians there is NO actual evidence they provided any information on Hillary Clinton, in fact all the intel says that an OPEN SOURCE code once used by the Russians and now available to ANYONE with an internet connection was used to hack the DNC. And then the intel agencies REFUSED to provide Congress with information about the Intel claims they had proof the Russians hacked the DNC.

It is also information which can't be verified, so it falls under ethical dilemmas...

Sure it can if the people that control the emails want to claim it was false they can release the emails. Failure to do so proves the information is actually truthful.

Not necessarily.....It is upon the accuser to supplement evidence...

Wrong, the leak can only be proven false by the original document. The leaker has no way to prove it other then the refusal of the original to release.

Then it would never be considerable applicable as evidence in a court of law...It would be considered hearsay..

It isn't required to be admissible in a Cort of law, it is admissible and was used in the Court of Public Opinion. And Hillary and Company never claimed any of it was false.

 

[Moonglow]

The code found on several liberal PCs, which does not prove successful Russian hacking, is out-dated Ukrainian code that can currently be downloaded off the internet and used by anyone.

The malware fed back to servers used by the Russian intelligence services, retard.

Really? That is in fact NOT stated in the report nor was it reported in the files given to Congress. Perhaps you can link to this claim?

Yet you will deny that info, but push and trust info that can't be verified because it supports your ideology...

 

[Moonglow]

It is also information which can't be verified, so it falls under ethical dilemmas...

Sure it can if the people that control the emails want to claim it was false they can release the emails. Failure to do so proves the information is actually truthful.

Not necessarily.....It is upon the accuser to supplement evidence...

Wrong, the leak can only be proven false by the original document. The leaker has no way to prove it other then the refusal of the original to release.

Then it would never be considerable applicable as evidence in a court of law...It would be considered hearsay..

It isn't required to be admissible in a Cort of law, it is admissible and was used in the Court of Public Opinion. And Hillary and Company never claimed any of it was false.

Well the court of public opinion has killed many people, that were innocent..not that I am saying that Hillary is innocent..I would have never voted for her even if she was the only candidate..

 

[g5000]

Hey, tards. WE HAD UN PERMISSION TO INTERVENE IN LIBYA!

FAIL!

Try again.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The code found on several liberal PCs, which does not prove successful Russian hacking, is out-dated Ukrainian code that can currently be downloaded off the internet and used by anyone.

The malware fed back to servers used by the Russian intelligence services, retard.

Really? That is in fact NOT stated in the report nor was it reported in the files given to Congress. Perhaps you can link to this claim?

Yet you will deny that info, but push and trust info that can't be verified because it supports your ideology...

Deny unverified information? You are the one doing that. I asked for a link.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Hey, tards. WE HAD UN PERMISSION TO INTERVENE IN LIBYA.

FAIL!

Did we have UN permission to intervene in Britain, Israel or Egypt?

 

[g5000]

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973

 

[RetiredGySgt]

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973

Again does that allow for intervention in Britain, Egypt and Israel?

 

[Synthaholic]

But while we talk about the Russians there is NO actual evidence they provided any information on Hillary Clinton

Unless you are privy to classified information, and are divulging it illegally, you are talking out your ass.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

But while we talk about the Russians there is NO actual evidence they provided any information on Hillary Clinton

Unless you are privy to classified information, and are divulging it illegally, you are talking out your ass.

Actually Congress demanded the proof and they have the clearance and guess what? The agencies REFUSED to brief them. No evidence hurts when called on it.