- Thread starter
- #21
If it is a permanent need than training new employees so working overtime isn't necessary is the best option, especially if it isnn't mandatory.WTF?
Hiring people to train them and get them up to speed.
Takes a LOT more $$$ than paying overtime.
Overtime isn't mandatory, except for salaried employees or managers who get ripped off working overtime, ALL the time.
ie when you needed them to work overtime temporarily, ie crunch as you said. Smart move.Not me, that would be your dear leader and the scummy foreigner.
Sure, by replacing/firing your employees?
BS.
I was an employer, of a small business.
I paid overtime to people who volunteered for it when I was in crunch, even strapped on my tool belt to meet the demand, often working as a helper, getting the materials to keep my journeymen working, so they wouldn't waste time looking for stuff I got for them.
They do alll the time. A employer doesn't need to know how to do every employees job but it is a wise thing if they ndid to avoid an employee frommholding him and that jobhostage.Imagine that, a boss helping their employees do manual labor.
Your dear leader or his foreign buddy would never steep to such depths.