wow someone went through a lot of pain to put that together. However, if I may politely tell you that it means zip to my request. So, I'm glad you know how to maneuver through the internet. Good for you. but doesn't answer my post. Oh and btw, I did go to a few of the links and the one I found outstanding was the one to the sea level rise. showing millimeter on the axis to make 3.5 inches look like a mountain. very funny. but not unexpected.
GOP Catholics more convinced about climate change than other Republicans
Of non-Catholic Republicans, who will henceforth be referred to in this topic as pagans (), 42 percent agree global warming is happening.
Of Catholic Republicans, 51 percent agree global warming is happening.
answered in the previous post, this is a duplicate.
doesn't answer the request to show what 120 PPM of CO2 does. It is purely measurements. fail.
doesn't answer the request to show what 120 PPM of CO2 does. It is purely measurements. fail.
doesn't answer the request to show what 120 PPM of CO2 does. It is purely measurements. fail.
doesn't answer the request to show what 120 PPM of CO2 does. It is purely measurements. fail.
doesn't answer the request to show what 120 PPM of CO2 does. It is purely measurements. fail.
graph shows 3.5 inches after converting the millimeters to inches. funny stuff but fail.
no evidence of CO2 causes temperature changes. everyone and their brother knows CO2 follows temperatures, or do you not agree?
abstract: "Kirpotin describes an "ecological landslide that is probably irreversible and is undoubtedly connected to climatic warming"."
so I'm not going to play your game any longer, so do you have one link with evidence or not? I can debunk each and everyone you posted. So what you're actually proving is you have zip to prove your hypothesis. Thanks for playing. But you are lying.
I never stated climate didn't change, so not sure why you presented this one.
lines at the service stations waiting on gas to be delivered. Funny stuff, why Carter lost the election to Reagan. Yep, but to the punks on here that all never happened.
Mr. jc, this has been posted many, many times. It is a site of the largest scientific society on this planet, the American Institute of Physics, and it explains the history of the science concerning GHGs in the atmosphere.
Mr. Flacaltenn, since a good part of our system of government and commerce is socialistic, as is everybody else's that are not economic failures, how is socialism an attack on our system? From the National Park System, to the Armed Services, socialism is a part of our system. That you cannot see this only addresses your intellectual problems, not those of the sane portion of our voting population.
Mr. Blackrook, you are not old enough to remember the scientific community going along with 'global cooling' because that never happened. While there was some debate concerning the dimming effect of the aerosols, the majority of papers even in the '70's stated that the big danger was from the warming effects of the GHG's.
