Projection suits you.Nothing but diversion and that form of fallacy for your Cause; i got it.Apparently you only selectively read it. While the court say the government had a compelling reason within the realm of citizen safety itSo what; just the right (hand) slapping itself (which can be quite a feat in itself), through the cognitive dissonance of Appealing to Ignorance of our Commerce Clause.Ok, let's get back to the point of this thread; the liberal gun grabbers getting bitch-slapped by the NRA, the 2nd Amendment, and the American People.
In this latest slapping, a law against state to state transfer of weapons was shot down:
BREAKING Federal Judge Strikes Down Interstate Handgun Transfer Ban - The Truth About Guns
I already told you, you chose to ignore or reject it in favor of your own MODERN world view. I can't help it if you don't or won't get it and opt to continue your line of rationality.Ah yes, a zealot. Bet you hope that if you keep repeating your lie often enough people will believe it.Dude, There is no appeal to ignorance of the Intent and Purpose of any law, much less a supreme law of the land which declares what is necessary (and proper) to the security of a free State. 10USC311 defines the Militia of the United States. Any Thing else is a simple, Appeal to Ignorance.And based on the writings of the founding fathers, the laws in place in the colonies which remained in force when each colony became a state AND the historical context (their concept of not only militia but specifically HOW they wrote it) which differs from your MODERN interpretation, you'd be wrong.
Beside SCOTUS disagrees with you........ go figure.
My suggestion is do some historical research, both in documentation and the cultural aspect (what and how they thought as well as the meanings of words in there era which have "evolved" today) and if you still believe what you do now then it's by choice, bereft of any basis in fact, remember Original Intent is always the key.
I guess Original Intent means nothing to you tovarich.
dude, what part of the original Intent and Purpose do you suppose you have to appeal to ignorance of, to advance such an unsound line of reasoning?
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.![]()
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State
There is no Appeal to Ignorance of the Intent and Purpose of Any law, much less our supreme law of the land.
