Pools kill more people each year than AR-15 rifles...time to ban pools...right?

[2aguy]

The anti-gun logic goes....people are killed by AR-15 rifles....we must ban AR-15 rifles....

So...using that kind of insane logic....pools kill more people....a lot more people.....than AR-15 rifles each and every year...therefore...we need to ban pools.....

People killed by all rifle types in 2017....403

People killed by pools every year? Over 3,500

No One Really Needs to Have a Pool in Their Yard - The Truth About Guns

In the news recently, was another celebrity toddler drowning. As horrible as that is, this tragedy was one of over 3500 unintentional drownings that occur yearly in the U.S. , not counting boating accidents. Skier Bode Miller‘s family experienced a similar heartache just last year.


Why am I bringing up these horrible toddler deaths on a gun page? Because child death by drowning is a far bigger problem than child death by firearms. In fact as the CDC itself states: “Drowning is responsible for more deaths among children 1-4 than any other cause except congenital anomalies (birth defects). Among those 1-14, fatal drowning remains the second-leading cause of unintentional injury-related death behind motor vehicle crashes.”

Yet you wouldn’t know that by the amount of noise we hear from the American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical societies about firearms versus what we hear about water safety.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has recently updated their policy statement regarding drowning and has a web page which includes a list of Swim Safety Tips.

The tips run the gamut from ways to secure your pool, to CPR training for adults, to safety equipment that should be available near a pool.

You know what is conspicuously absent from all of this advice? Telling parents to NOT have a pool, to NOT buy a boat, and to NEVER EVER go to the beach or lake.

Another conspicuous absence is the lobbying of government officials to place ever greater restrictions on swimming pools, boats, and bodies of natural water large and small, and even to ban some pools and boats completely.

Also absent is the demonization of the bathtub industry and the pool lobby, bills to sue pool manufacturers for deaths that they callously enable, and the advice to grill other parents about their pool habits and if there is any standing water or toilets where children play.

According to your logic, since “few” people are killed by bazookas, they should be legal and easily purchased?
Maybe that guy in Las Vegas could have killed more people that night, which would change your argument then.

No, twit......a Bazooka is not used for self defense......it doesn't fit the definition of bearable arms, and we haven't had bazookas for about 50 years.....

OK
RPGs

Area effect weapon....not suitable for civilians......

 

[Rustic]

It doesn't matter one is the actual cause of deaths by drowning it doesn't take a person to make you drown in a pool

The other all by itself cannot harm anyone and must be wielded by a person

Like a Car.

or a knife or a baseball bat etc

People like to say a gun is designed to kill therefore that is the purpose of a gun.

I disagree with that and say that it is the person who is using the tool that defines the purpose of the tool.

sorry but guns are designed to kill,,,you can of course do other things with them,,,

No

Guns are designed to propel a projectile at a target of the users choosing.

Whether or not that gun kills is decided by the person firing it.

A hammer is designed to concentrate the force of a blow to a very small area. The purpose of the hammer is whatever the person using it decides it is.

I think when the first gun was made it was for the purpose of killing,,whether that be food or human,,,

the last thing they were thinking about was a tin can or piece of paper

Someone else’s Firearm ownership is an absolute personal thing, none of your fucking business.

 

[22lcidw]

AR-15 is designed to maximize the slaughter of people

^^^
A lie

AR-15 was designed along with the M 16 to maximize the number of kills in a short period of time.

It was not designed to hunt squirrels

What you say could be true. But after all these years it is trust. We did not have these issues in the numbers we see back in the bad old days. People have been driven crazy.......Agendas have proliferated so far towards social justice that the nation is a petri dish of psyche disorders.... Dumber is smarter. Better is suppressed....traditional values are no good....the one time oppressed are the rulers.....excellence is replaced by qualified...living by rules is hate....and so much more. I mean who the hell dresses their toddler boys in girls outfits or even worse gets them a sex change operation! So to some thrown over the edge, suicide is painless and they take some with them. Others are just full of hate and convinced by others of it.

 

[Rustic]

or a knife or a baseball bat etc

People like to say a gun is designed to kill therefore that is the purpose of a gun.

I disagree with that and say that it is the person who is using the tool that defines the purpose of the tool.

sorry but guns are designed to kill,,,you can of course do other things with them,,,

No

Guns are designed to propel a projectile at a target of the users choosing.

Whether or not that gun kills is decided by the person firing it.

A hammer is designed to concentrate the force of a blow to a very small area. The purpose of the hammer is whatever the person using it decides it is.

I think when the first gun was made it was for the purpose of killing,,whether that be food or human,,,

the last thing they were thinking about was a tin can or piece of paper

It was made to fire a projectile at a target faster and with more power than a bow and arrow or a spear.

The target is the choice of the person

Gun powder was invented for fireworks not weapons but it is the user of the gun powder that decides the purpose

What was the original purpose of a gun?
Guns were originally created for the purpose of killing other people in war. Every advancement in firearm technology was for the purpose of making firearms more effective in killing.
'Guns have an original purpose of killing.' What are your thoughts ...

https://www.quora.com/Guns-have-an-original-purpose-of-killing-What-are-your-thoug...

Search for: What was the original purpose of a gun?

There is a reason why we have the Second Amendment, To deal with fucked up thinking...

 

[ph3iron]

The anti-gun logic goes....people are killed by AR-15 rifles....we must ban AR-15 rifles....

So...using that kind of insane logic....pools kill more people....a lot more people.....than AR-15 rifles each and every year...therefore...we need to ban pools.....

People killed by all rifle types in 2017....403

People killed by pools every year? Over 3,500

No One Really Needs to Have a Pool in Their Yard - The Truth About Guns

In the news recently, was another celebrity toddler drowning. As horrible as that is, this tragedy was one of over 3500 unintentional drownings that occur yearly in the U.S. , not counting boating accidents. Skier Bode Miller‘s family experienced a similar heartache just last year.


Why am I bringing up these horrible toddler deaths on a gun page? Because child death by drowning is a far bigger problem than child death by firearms. In fact as the CDC itself states: “Drowning is responsible for more deaths among children 1-4 than any other cause except congenital anomalies (birth defects). Among those 1-14, fatal drowning remains the second-leading cause of unintentional injury-related death behind motor vehicle crashes.”

Yet you wouldn’t know that by the amount of noise we hear from the American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical societies about firearms versus what we hear about water safety.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has recently updated their policy statement regarding drowning and has a web page which includes a list of Swim Safety Tips.

The tips run the gamut from ways to secure your pool, to CPR training for adults, to safety equipment that should be available near a pool.

You know what is conspicuously absent from all of this advice? Telling parents to NOT have a pool, to NOT buy a boat, and to NEVER EVER go to the beach or lake.

Another conspicuous absence is the lobbying of government officials to place ever greater restrictions on swimming pools, boats, and bodies of natural water large and small, and even to ban some pools and boats completely.

Also absent is the demonization of the bathtub industry and the pool lobby, bills to sue pool manufacturers for deaths that they callously enable, and the advice to grill other parents about their pool habits and if there is any standing water or toilets where children play.

Stupid.
One 5 year old killing his sister is one too ,many
Youd flee for the hills from your double wide clutching you guns if the Chinese showed up

 

[ph3iron]

sorry but guns are designed to kill,,,you can of course do other things with them,,,

No

Guns are designed to propel a projectile at a target of the users choosing.

Whether or not that gun kills is decided by the person firing it.

A hammer is designed to concentrate the force of a blow to a very small area. The purpose of the hammer is whatever the person using it decides it is.

I think when the first gun was made it was for the purpose of killing,,whether that be food or human,,,

the last thing they were thinking about was a tin can or piece of paper

It was made to fire a projectile at a target faster and with more power than a bow and arrow or a spear.

The target is the choice of the person

Gun powder was invented for fireworks not weapons but it is the user of the gun powder that decides the purpose

What was the original purpose of a gun?
Guns were originally created for the purpose of killing other people in war. Every advancement in firearm technology was for the purpose of making firearms more effective in killing.
'Guns have an original purpose of killing.' What are your thoughts ...

https://www.quora.com/Guns-have-an-original-purpose-of-killing-What-are-your-thoug...

Search for: What was the original purpose of a gun?

There is a reason why we have the Second Amendment, To deal with fucked up thinking...

Nice foul mouth.
Trump u?
Indoctrinating kids into foul spew?

 

[Rustic]

AR-15 is designed to maximize the slaughter of people

^^^
A lie

AR-15 was designed along with the M 16 to maximize the number of kills in a short period of time.

It was not designed to hunt squirrels

The .223/5.56 is an small to medium game Cartridge, Very well-suited for coyotes, rabbits, prairie dogs, antelope, etc.
It’s a .22 caliber with Decent ballistic coefficient, Little to no recoil, not loud, Short action, lightweight, cheap and very abundant.

Which makes it just about perfect for varmint hunting… Hence the reason for Existence of the AR15.

That cartridge is used in bolt actions, single actions, “semi-auto”, “autos”, lever actions...

And ARs are chambered in just about every cartridge there is... So basically you’re talking generics when you say ARs are designs for “killing, warfare or whatever”… It makes you sound incredibly ignorant… In fact stupidly ignorant.

 

[miketx]

The anti-gun logic goes....people are killed by AR-15 rifles....we must ban AR-15 rifles....

So...using that kind of insane logic....pools kill more people....a lot more people.....than AR-15 rifles each and every year...therefore...we need to ban pools.....

People killed by all rifle types in 2017....403

People killed by pools every year? Over 3,500

No One Really Needs to Have a Pool in Their Yard - The Truth About Guns

In the news recently, was another celebrity toddler drowning. As horrible as that is, this tragedy was one of over 3500 unintentional drownings that occur yearly in the U.S. , not counting boating accidents. Skier Bode Miller‘s family experienced a similar heartache just last year.


Why am I bringing up these horrible toddler deaths on a gun page? Because child death by drowning is a far bigger problem than child death by firearms. In fact as the CDC itself states: “Drowning is responsible for more deaths among children 1-4 than any other cause except congenital anomalies (birth defects). Among those 1-14, fatal drowning remains the second-leading cause of unintentional injury-related death behind motor vehicle crashes.”

Yet you wouldn’t know that by the amount of noise we hear from the American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical societies about firearms versus what we hear about water safety.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has recently updated their policy statement regarding drowning and has a web page which includes a list of Swim Safety Tips.

The tips run the gamut from ways to secure your pool, to CPR training for adults, to safety equipment that should be available near a pool.

You know what is conspicuously absent from all of this advice? Telling parents to NOT have a pool, to NOT buy a boat, and to NEVER EVER go to the beach or lake.

Another conspicuous absence is the lobbying of government officials to place ever greater restrictions on swimming pools, boats, and bodies of natural water large and small, and even to ban some pools and boats completely.

Also absent is the demonization of the bathtub industry and the pool lobby, bills to sue pool manufacturers for deaths that they callously enable, and the advice to grill other parents about their pool habits and if there is any standing water or toilets where children play.

Hear hear! All that is needed is to pass laws that limit the dangerous accessories that can be used with pools and passing sensible safety laws. No dangerous high diving boards, no water allowed to be spilled on the walking areas around the pool. 12 foot high fences with razor wire to keep out stray kids. Remove all chemicals from the water, and require all pool nuts to wear scuba gear at all times, requiring its use 30 minutes before and after using the pool. Hiring armed guards to enforce who has access to these killing machines as well. And last but not least when the pool is not in use, the water must be stored in a separate location from the actual pool.

 

[2aguy]

The anti-gun logic goes....people are killed by AR-15 rifles....we must ban AR-15 rifles....

So...using that kind of insane logic....pools kill more people....a lot more people.....than AR-15 rifles each and every year...therefore...we need to ban pools.....

People killed by all rifle types in 2017....403

People killed by pools every year? Over 3,500

No One Really Needs to Have a Pool in Their Yard - The Truth About Guns

In the news recently, was another celebrity toddler drowning. As horrible as that is, this tragedy was one of over 3500 unintentional drownings that occur yearly in the U.S. , not counting boating accidents. Skier Bode Miller‘s family experienced a similar heartache just last year.


Why am I bringing up these horrible toddler deaths on a gun page? Because child death by drowning is a far bigger problem than child death by firearms. In fact as the CDC itself states: “Drowning is responsible for more deaths among children 1-4 than any other cause except congenital anomalies (birth defects). Among those 1-14, fatal drowning remains the second-leading cause of unintentional injury-related death behind motor vehicle crashes.”

Yet you wouldn’t know that by the amount of noise we hear from the American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical societies about firearms versus what we hear about water safety.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has recently updated their policy statement regarding drowning and has a web page which includes a list of Swim Safety Tips.

The tips run the gamut from ways to secure your pool, to CPR training for adults, to safety equipment that should be available near a pool.

You know what is conspicuously absent from all of this advice? Telling parents to NOT have a pool, to NOT buy a boat, and to NEVER EVER go to the beach or lake.

Another conspicuous absence is the lobbying of government officials to place ever greater restrictions on swimming pools, boats, and bodies of natural water large and small, and even to ban some pools and boats completely.

Also absent is the demonization of the bathtub industry and the pool lobby, bills to sue pool manufacturers for deaths that they callously enable, and the advice to grill other parents about their pool habits and if there is any standing water or toilets where children play.

Stupid.
One 5 year old killing his sister is one too ,many
Youd flee for the hills from your double wide clutching you guns if the Chinese showed up

Pools kill over 3,500 people every year, including 5 year olds....so as I suggest, we need to ban pools...according to your logic...right?

 

[2aguy]

The anti-gun logic goes....people are killed by AR-15 rifles....we must ban AR-15 rifles....

So...using that kind of insane logic....pools kill more people....a lot more people.....than AR-15 rifles each and every year...therefore...we need to ban pools.....

People killed by all rifle types in 2017....403

People killed by pools every year? Over 3,500

No One Really Needs to Have a Pool in Their Yard - The Truth About Guns

In the news recently, was another celebrity toddler drowning. As horrible as that is, this tragedy was one of over 3500 unintentional drownings that occur yearly in the U.S. , not counting boating accidents. Skier Bode Miller‘s family experienced a similar heartache just last year.


Why am I bringing up these horrible toddler deaths on a gun page? Because child death by drowning is a far bigger problem than child death by firearms. In fact as the CDC itself states: “Drowning is responsible for more deaths among children 1-4 than any other cause except congenital anomalies (birth defects). Among those 1-14, fatal drowning remains the second-leading cause of unintentional injury-related death behind motor vehicle crashes.”

Yet you wouldn’t know that by the amount of noise we hear from the American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical societies about firearms versus what we hear about water safety.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has recently updated their policy statement regarding drowning and has a web page which includes a list of Swim Safety Tips.

The tips run the gamut from ways to secure your pool, to CPR training for adults, to safety equipment that should be available near a pool.

You know what is conspicuously absent from all of this advice? Telling parents to NOT have a pool, to NOT buy a boat, and to NEVER EVER go to the beach or lake.

Another conspicuous absence is the lobbying of government officials to place ever greater restrictions on swimming pools, boats, and bodies of natural water large and small, and even to ban some pools and boats completely.

Also absent is the demonization of the bathtub industry and the pool lobby, bills to sue pool manufacturers for deaths that they callously enable, and the advice to grill other parents about their pool habits and if there is any standing water or toilets where children play.

Hear hear! All that is needed is to pass laws that limit the dangerous accessories that can be used with pools and passing sensible safety laws. No dangerous high diving boards, no water allowed to be spilled on the walking areas around the pool. 12 foot high fences with razor wire to keep out stray kids. Remove all chemicals from the water, and require all pool nuts to wear scuba gear at all times, requiring its use 30 minutes before and after using the pool. Hiring armed guards to enforce who has access to these killing machines as well. And last but not least when the pool is not in use, the water must be stored in a separate location from the actual pool.

Before you use a pool you need to take a swim test...every time you use the pool......

 

[progressive hunter]

sporting is what you do with them,,,same as assault,,,

its these descriptions that confuse the discussions,,,all guns are designed for killing but can be used for other things like sporting,,,

Sporting means hunting, plinking, etc...
ARs and the like have never been military grade... They could never pass muster.

So calling them assault weapons is plainly dishonest and ignorant...

I dont consider hunting a sport,,,,its called getting food, if it were a sport the animal would have a gun too,,,
a sport is two sides competing under the same rules

but if you use one to assault people that makes it an assault weapon,,

and only because we have better they dont pass muster, but they would be very effective in a war situation,,,

Make no mistake Hunting is a sport, Both sustenance and trophy.


Most rifles sold are semi automatic you pull the trigger and one round is fired… That’s what semi automatic is. And no military would except Ars and the like for warfare... Military weapons have to pass military muster… ARs would never

they would if they didnt have something better

and trophy hunters disgust me

its these play on words that have us losing the debate on the 2nd A

Over the counter ARs and the like have never been used by any military, they are useless for such purposes. They don’t have m-4 ramps, barrels and gas chambers Which of all three are absolutely necessary for any type of military grade weapon.

You don’t understand trophy hunting, It actually is the best thing for game populations....
It adds value to a species much greater than any other form of conservation...
It ensures the best genetics into the population for the longest amount of time...
It ensures that declining/old animals do not pass on their genetics...
It make sure that animals with disease and bad genetics are not part of the population...
Trophy Hunting is as old is civilization itself... It is a great sport
In Third World countries it feeds populations and gives them a source of income....
Here in North America it is absolutely the best way to prolong a healthy population of game animals...
You need to be more open minded on the subject

The Second Amendment is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves... And political correctness is no way to judge anything that is good

whos military are you referring to??? some military still use bolt action,,,

trophy hunting is for guys with little dicks,,,

herd population can be controlled by real hunters looking for food and not to compensate for a little dick,,

trophy hunting in history was for rich pricks with little dicks,,real men hunt for food not pleasure,,,

all arms can and are weapons of war,, which is exactly what the 2nd was for,,

dont be shy,,stand up for your rights,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

sorry but guns are designed to kill,,,you can of course do other things with them,,,

No

Guns are designed to propel a projectile at a target of the users choosing.

Whether or not that gun kills is decided by the person firing it.

A hammer is designed to concentrate the force of a blow to a very small area. The purpose of the hammer is whatever the person using it decides it is.

I think when the first gun was made it was for the purpose of killing,,whether that be food or human,,,

the last thing they were thinking about was a tin can or piece of paper

It was made to fire a projectile at a target faster and with more power than a bow and arrow or a spear.

The target is the choice of the person

Gun powder was invented for fireworks not weapons but it is the user of the gun powder that decides the purpose

What was the original purpose of a gun?
Guns were originally created for the purpose of killing other people in war. Every advancement in firearm technology was for the purpose of making firearms more effective in killing.
'Guns have an original purpose of killing.' What are your thoughts ...

https://www.quora.com/Guns-have-an-original-purpose-of-killing-What-are-your-thoug...

Search for: What was the original purpose of a gun?

There is a reason why we have the Second Amendment, To deal with fucked up thinking...

the only fucked up thinking zI know of is those that say it wasnt for weapons of war

 

[Theowl32]

The rich elitist left will be able to own pools.

Just like how the elitist left all live behind walls in predominantly white neighborhoods. Even the elitist negro (white libs call them African Americans for some stupid reason) live in those neighborhoods. Huh....

Just like the elitist leftists all have ginormous carbon footprints and yet yell and scream about THE global WARMING that does not exist. Like al gore and what big sacrifices has that aoc made for the sake of THE global WARMING? Any? Does she ride a bike to work? Nooo?

Fucking hypocrisy of the left. If and when they conclude that pools are dangerous to the environment, the movement will be to take pools away from the middle class. Why they all enjoy swimming in swimming pools.

Trust that.

 

[Rustic]

Sporting means hunting, plinking, etc...
ARs and the like have never been military grade... They could never pass muster.

So calling them assault weapons is plainly dishonest and ignorant...

I dont consider hunting a sport,,,,its called getting food, if it were a sport the animal would have a gun too,,,
a sport is two sides competing under the same rules

but if you use one to assault people that makes it an assault weapon,,

and only because we have better they dont pass muster, but they would be very effective in a war situation,,,

Make no mistake Hunting is a sport, Both sustenance and trophy.


Most rifles sold are semi automatic you pull the trigger and one round is fired… That’s what semi automatic is. And no military would except Ars and the like for warfare... Military weapons have to pass military muster… ARs would never

they would if they didnt have something better

and trophy hunters disgust me

its these play on words that have us losing the debate on the 2nd A

Over the counter ARs and the like have never been used by any military, they are useless for such purposes. They don’t have m-4 ramps, barrels and gas chambers Which of all three are absolutely necessary for any type of military grade weapon.

You don’t understand trophy hunting, It actually is the best thing for game populations....
It adds value to a species much greater than any other form of conservation...
It ensures the best genetics into the population for the longest amount of time...
It ensures that declining/old animals do not pass on their genetics...
It make sure that animals with disease and bad genetics are not part of the population...
Trophy Hunting is as old is civilization itself... It is a great sport
In Third World countries it feeds populations and gives them a source of income....
Here in North America it is absolutely the best way to prolong a healthy population of game animals...
You need to be more open minded on the subject

The Second Amendment is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves... And political correctness is no way to judge anything that is good

whos military are you referring to??? some military still use bolt action,,,

trophy hunting is for guys with little dicks,,,

herd population can be controlled by real hunters looking for food and not to compensate for a little dick,,

trophy hunting in history was for rich pricks with little dicks,,real men hunt for food not pleasure,,,

all arms can and are weapons of war,, which is exactly what the 2nd was for,,

dont be shy,,stand up for your rights,,,

lol
You’re Obsessed with penis just like Joe...
Just because a weapon looks like a military weapon does not mean it is a military weapon... You cannot judge a book by its cover

Trophy hunting is invaluable to game populations, First of all it only excepts the best genetics. It culls out the worst genetics, it allows the best animals to pass their Genetics to the herd for the longest possible time.
If you had any common sense, You would realize trophy hunting only allows for the best genetics. That’s what it’s all about.
As an example, A mule deer is in its prime Between the ages of 2 1/2 to 6 years old. As a trophy Hunter you want to wait till it hits its peak before you harvest the animal. That way it passes It’s genetics to the most does possible.
Once the mule deer goes past its peak that is where the bad genetics will hurt the game population.

And no one’s going to spend any money to harvest substandard mule deer...

Trophy hunting is all about improving the game species for future harvesting… He can’t get any more simple than that. Lol

 

[progressive hunter]

I dont consider hunting a sport,,,,its called getting food, if it were a sport the animal would have a gun too,,,
a sport is two sides competing under the same rules

but if you use one to assault people that makes it an assault weapon,,

and only because we have better they dont pass muster, but they would be very effective in a war situation,,,

Make no mistake Hunting is a sport, Both sustenance and trophy.


Most rifles sold are semi automatic you pull the trigger and one round is fired… That’s what semi automatic is. And no military would except Ars and the like for warfare... Military weapons have to pass military muster… ARs would never

they would if they didnt have something better

and trophy hunters disgust me

its these play on words that have us losing the debate on the 2nd A

Over the counter ARs and the like have never been used by any military, they are useless for such purposes. They don’t have m-4 ramps, barrels and gas chambers Which of all three are absolutely necessary for any type of military grade weapon.

You don’t understand trophy hunting, It actually is the best thing for game populations....
It adds value to a species much greater than any other form of conservation...
It ensures the best genetics into the population for the longest amount of time...
It ensures that declining/old animals do not pass on their genetics...
It make sure that animals with disease and bad genetics are not part of the population...
Trophy Hunting is as old is civilization itself... It is a great sport
In Third World countries it feeds populations and gives them a source of income....
Here in North America it is absolutely the best way to prolong a healthy population of game animals...
You need to be more open minded on the subject

The Second Amendment is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves... And political correctness is no way to judge anything that is good

whos military are you referring to??? some military still use bolt action,,,

trophy hunting is for guys with little dicks,,,

herd population can be controlled by real hunters looking for food and not to compensate for a little dick,,

trophy hunting in history was for rich pricks with little dicks,,real men hunt for food not pleasure,,,

all arms can and are weapons of war,, which is exactly what the 2nd was for,,

dont be shy,,stand up for your rights,,,

lol
You’re Obsessed with penis just like Joe...
Just because a weapon looks like a military weapon does not mean it is a military weapon... You cannot judge a book by its cover

Trophy hunting is invaluable to game populations, First of all it only excepts the best genetics. It culls out the worst genetics, it allows the best animals to pass their Genetics to the herd for the longest possible time.
If you had any common sense, You would realize trophy hunting only allows for the best genetics. That’s what it’s all about.
As an example, A mule deer is in its prime Between the ages of 2 1/2 to 6 years old. As a trophy Hunter you want to wait till it hits its peak before you harvest the animal. That way it passes It’s genetics to the most does possible.
Once the mule deer goes past its peak that is where the bad genetics will hurt the game population.

And no one’s going to spend any money to harvest substandard mule deer...

Trophy hunting is all about improving the game species for future harvesting… He can’t get any more simple than that. Lol

obviously you dont know shit about trophy hunting,,,they always take the biggest and healthiest,,,thats why its called a trophy and not food,,heck even some of the pricks dont even keep the meat and give it away,,,

they never take the unhealthy or runts,,,

like I said real people that hunt for food do the same thing

you never said,,what military are you talking about??? cause its all a matter of money and resources that determine what weapon you carry,,,sure an M-5 is better than a AR,,and some are better than an M-5,,,

but I would rather have an AR than a 22 or bolt action,,,

guns were created for the purpose of killing or war, what you decide to do with them other than that is your business

 

[progressive hunter]

I dont consider hunting a sport,,,,its called getting food, if it were a sport the animal would have a gun too,,,
a sport is two sides competing under the same rules

but if you use one to assault people that makes it an assault weapon,,

and only because we have better they dont pass muster, but they would be very effective in a war situation,,,

Make no mistake Hunting is a sport, Both sustenance and trophy.


Most rifles sold are semi automatic you pull the trigger and one round is fired… That’s what semi automatic is. And no military would except Ars and the like for warfare... Military weapons have to pass military muster… ARs would never

they would if they didnt have something better

and trophy hunters disgust me

its these play on words that have us losing the debate on the 2nd A

Over the counter ARs and the like have never been used by any military, they are useless for such purposes. They don’t have m-4 ramps, barrels and gas chambers Which of all three are absolutely necessary for any type of military grade weapon.

You don’t understand trophy hunting, It actually is the best thing for game populations....
It adds value to a species much greater than any other form of conservation...
It ensures the best genetics into the population for the longest amount of time...
It ensures that declining/old animals do not pass on their genetics...
It make sure that animals with disease and bad genetics are not part of the population...
Trophy Hunting is as old is civilization itself... It is a great sport
In Third World countries it feeds populations and gives them a source of income....
Here in North America it is absolutely the best way to prolong a healthy population of game animals...
You need to be more open minded on the subject

The Second Amendment is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves... And political correctness is no way to judge anything that is good

whos military are you referring to??? some military still use bolt action,,,

trophy hunting is for guys with little dicks,,,

herd population can be controlled by real hunters looking for food and not to compensate for a little dick,,

trophy hunting in history was for rich pricks with little dicks,,real men hunt for food not pleasure,,,

all arms can and are weapons of war,, which is exactly what the 2nd was for,,

dont be shy,,stand up for your rights,,,

lol
You’re Obsessed with penis just like Joe...
Just because a weapon looks like a military weapon does not mean it is a military weapon... You cannot judge a book by its cover

Trophy hunting is invaluable to game populations, First of all it only excepts the best genetics. It culls out the worst genetics, it allows the best animals to pass their Genetics to the herd for the longest possible time.
If you had any common sense, You would realize trophy hunting only allows for the best genetics. That’s what it’s all about.
As an example, A mule deer is in its prime Between the ages of 2 1/2 to 6 years old. As a trophy Hunter you want to wait till it hits its peak before you harvest the animal. That way it passes It’s genetics to the most does possible.
Once the mule deer goes past its peak that is where the bad genetics will hurt the game population.

And no one’s going to spend any money to harvest substandard mule deer...

Trophy hunting is all about improving the game species for future harvesting… He can’t get any more simple than that. Lol

sorry,,,

but what money needs spent other than a permit???,,OH and 1 bullet,,,

 

[Rustic]

Make no mistake Hunting is a sport, Both sustenance and trophy.


Most rifles sold are semi automatic you pull the trigger and one round is fired… That’s what semi automatic is. And no military would except Ars and the like for warfare... Military weapons have to pass military muster… ARs would never

they would if they didnt have something better

and trophy hunters disgust me

its these play on words that have us losing the debate on the 2nd A

Over the counter ARs and the like have never been used by any military, they are useless for such purposes. They don’t have m-4 ramps, barrels and gas chambers Which of all three are absolutely necessary for any type of military grade weapon.

You don’t understand trophy hunting, It actually is the best thing for game populations....
It adds value to a species much greater than any other form of conservation...
It ensures the best genetics into the population for the longest amount of time...
It ensures that declining/old animals do not pass on their genetics...
It make sure that animals with disease and bad genetics are not part of the population...
Trophy Hunting is as old is civilization itself... It is a great sport
In Third World countries it feeds populations and gives them a source of income....
Here in North America it is absolutely the best way to prolong a healthy population of game animals...
You need to be more open minded on the subject

The Second Amendment is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves... And political correctness is no way to judge anything that is good

whos military are you referring to??? some military still use bolt action,,,

trophy hunting is for guys with little dicks,,,

herd population can be controlled by real hunters looking for food and not to compensate for a little dick,,

trophy hunting in history was for rich pricks with little dicks,,real men hunt for food not pleasure,,,

all arms can and are weapons of war,, which is exactly what the 2nd was for,,

dont be shy,,stand up for your rights,,,

lol
You’re Obsessed with penis just like Joe...
Just because a weapon looks like a military weapon does not mean it is a military weapon... You cannot judge a book by its cover

Trophy hunting is invaluable to game populations, First of all it only excepts the best genetics. It culls out the worst genetics, it allows the best animals to pass their Genetics to the herd for the longest possible time.
If you had any common sense, You would realize trophy hunting only allows for the best genetics. That’s what it’s all about.
As an example, A mule deer is in its prime Between the ages of 2 1/2 to 6 years old. As a trophy Hunter you want to wait till it hits its peak before you harvest the animal. That way it passes It’s genetics to the most does possible.
Once the mule deer goes past its peak that is where the bad genetics will hurt the game population.

And no one’s going to spend any money to harvest substandard mule deer...

Trophy hunting is all about improving the game species for future harvesting… He can’t get any more simple than that. Lol

obviously you dont know shit about trophy hunting,,,they always take the biggest and healthiest,,,thats why its called a trophy and not food,,heck even some of the pricks dont even keep the meat and give it away,,,

they never take the unhealthy or runts,,,

like I said real people that hunt for food do the same thing

you never said,,what military are you talking about??? cause its all a matter of money and resources that determine what weapon you carry,,,sure an M-5 is better than a AR,,and some are better than an M-5,,,

but I would rather have an AR than a 22 or bolt action,,,

guns were created for the purpose of killing or war, what you decide to do with them other than that is your business

lol
You need to educate yourself, The best animals will be able to spread their genes to the most Females With trophy hunting. Then before they decline they are harvesting.

As an example, The mule deer that I harvested last year on public land. I watched him for three seasons. He passed his genes along to who knows how many does in those three years before his decline.
Without trophy hunting some joker would’ve shot him when he was two years old most likely.
M-5?
You do realize ARs are available in most every cartridge? Get a grip man you don’t know what you’re talking about. Lol

 

[progressive hunter]

they would if they didnt have something better

and trophy hunters disgust me

its these play on words that have us losing the debate on the 2nd A

Over the counter ARs and the like have never been used by any military, they are useless for such purposes. They don’t have m-4 ramps, barrels and gas chambers Which of all three are absolutely necessary for any type of military grade weapon.

You don’t understand trophy hunting, It actually is the best thing for game populations....
It adds value to a species much greater than any other form of conservation...
It ensures the best genetics into the population for the longest amount of time...
It ensures that declining/old animals do not pass on their genetics...
It make sure that animals with disease and bad genetics are not part of the population...
Trophy Hunting is as old is civilization itself... It is a great sport
In Third World countries it feeds populations and gives them a source of income....
Here in North America it is absolutely the best way to prolong a healthy population of game animals...
You need to be more open minded on the subject

The Second Amendment is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves... And political correctness is no way to judge anything that is good

whos military are you referring to??? some military still use bolt action,,,

trophy hunting is for guys with little dicks,,,

herd population can be controlled by real hunters looking for food and not to compensate for a little dick,,

trophy hunting in history was for rich pricks with little dicks,,real men hunt for food not pleasure,,,

all arms can and are weapons of war,, which is exactly what the 2nd was for,,

dont be shy,,stand up for your rights,,,

lol
You’re Obsessed with penis just like Joe...
Just because a weapon looks like a military weapon does not mean it is a military weapon... You cannot judge a book by its cover

Trophy hunting is invaluable to game populations, First of all it only excepts the best genetics. It culls out the worst genetics, it allows the best animals to pass their Genetics to the herd for the longest possible time.
If you had any common sense, You would realize trophy hunting only allows for the best genetics. That’s what it’s all about.
As an example, A mule deer is in its prime Between the ages of 2 1/2 to 6 years old. As a trophy Hunter you want to wait till it hits its peak before you harvest the animal. That way it passes It’s genetics to the most does possible.
Once the mule deer goes past its peak that is where the bad genetics will hurt the game population.

And no one’s going to spend any money to harvest substandard mule deer...

Trophy hunting is all about improving the game species for future harvesting… He can’t get any more simple than that. Lol

obviously you dont know shit about trophy hunting,,,they always take the biggest and healthiest,,,thats why its called a trophy and not food,,heck even some of the pricks dont even keep the meat and give it away,,,

they never take the unhealthy or runts,,,

like I said real people that hunt for food do the same thing

you never said,,what military are you talking about??? cause its all a matter of money and resources that determine what weapon you carry,,,sure an M-5 is better than a AR,,and some are better than an M-5,,,

but I would rather have an AR than a 22 or bolt action,,,

guns were created for the purpose of killing or war, what you decide to do with them other than that is your business

lol
You need to educate yourself, The best animals will be able to spread their genes to the most Females With trophy hunting. Then before they decline they are harvesting.

As an example, The mule deer that I harvested last year on public land. I watched him for three seasons. He passed his genes along to who knows how many does in those three years before his decline.
Without trophy hunting some joker would’ve shot him when he was two years old most likely.
M-5?
You do realize ARs are available in most every cartridge? Get a grip man you don’t know what you’re talking about. Lol

m5 I think is what the military carries,,I dont know for sure but it doesnt matter,,,
whats the cartridge got to do with it???

what did I say thats not correct???

almost every major advancement in gun tech throughout history was because of military use,,,ie killing,,,

 

[Rustic]

Over the counter ARs and the like have never been used by any military, they are useless for such purposes. They don’t have m-4 ramps, barrels and gas chambers Which of all three are absolutely necessary for any type of military grade weapon.

You don’t understand trophy hunting, It actually is the best thing for game populations....
It adds value to a species much greater than any other form of conservation...
It ensures the best genetics into the population for the longest amount of time...
It ensures that declining/old animals do not pass on their genetics...
It make sure that animals with disease and bad genetics are not part of the population...
Trophy Hunting is as old is civilization itself... It is a great sport
In Third World countries it feeds populations and gives them a source of income....
Here in North America it is absolutely the best way to prolong a healthy population of game animals...
You need to be more open minded on the subject

The Second Amendment is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves... And political correctness is no way to judge anything that is good

whos military are you referring to??? some military still use bolt action,,,

trophy hunting is for guys with little dicks,,,

herd population can be controlled by real hunters looking for food and not to compensate for a little dick,,

trophy hunting in history was for rich pricks with little dicks,,real men hunt for food not pleasure,,,

all arms can and are weapons of war,, which is exactly what the 2nd was for,,

dont be shy,,stand up for your rights,,,

lol
You’re Obsessed with penis just like Joe...
Just because a weapon looks like a military weapon does not mean it is a military weapon... You cannot judge a book by its cover

Trophy hunting is invaluable to game populations, First of all it only excepts the best genetics. It culls out the worst genetics, it allows the best animals to pass their Genetics to the herd for the longest possible time.
If you had any common sense, You would realize trophy hunting only allows for the best genetics. That’s what it’s all about.
As an example, A mule deer is in its prime Between the ages of 2 1/2 to 6 years old. As a trophy Hunter you want to wait till it hits its peak before you harvest the animal. That way it passes It’s genetics to the most does possible.
Once the mule deer goes past its peak that is where the bad genetics will hurt the game population.

And no one’s going to spend any money to harvest substandard mule deer...

Trophy hunting is all about improving the game species for future harvesting… He can’t get any more simple than that. Lol

obviously you dont know shit about trophy hunting,,,they always take the biggest and healthiest,,,thats why its called a trophy and not food,,heck even some of the pricks dont even keep the meat and give it away,,,

they never take the unhealthy or runts,,,

like I said real people that hunt for food do the same thing

you never said,,what military are you talking about??? cause its all a matter of money and resources that determine what weapon you carry,,,sure an M-5 is better than a AR,,and some are better than an M-5,,,

but I would rather have an AR than a 22 or bolt action,,,

guns were created for the purpose of killing or war, what you decide to do with them other than that is your business

lol
You need to educate yourself, The best animals will be able to spread their genes to the most Females With trophy hunting. Then before they decline they are harvesting.

As an example, The mule deer that I harvested last year on public land. I watched him for three seasons. He passed his genes along to who knows how many does in those three years before his decline.
Without trophy hunting some joker would’ve shot him when he was two years old most likely.
M-5?
You do realize ARs are available in most every cartridge? Get a grip man you don’t know what you’re talking about. Lol

m5 I think is what the military carries,,I dont know for sure but it doesnt matter,,,
whats the cartridge got to do with it???

what did I say thats not correct???

almost every major advancement in gun tech throughout history was because of military use,,,ie killing,,,

You mean m-4 Carbine?
You really didn’t ask that did you? what does it matter what cartridge?
ARs don’t shoot a specific cartridge/caliber... lol

If you would do some research you would realize that Ars and the like are no different than any other sporting rifle. Available in a multitude of cartridges/calibers and one pull of the trigger = one shot

 

[progressive hunter]

whos military are you referring to??? some military still use bolt action,,,

trophy hunting is for guys with little dicks,,,

herd population can be controlled by real hunters looking for food and not to compensate for a little dick,,

trophy hunting in history was for rich pricks with little dicks,,real men hunt for food not pleasure,,,

all arms can and are weapons of war,, which is exactly what the 2nd was for,,

dont be shy,,stand up for your rights,,,

lol
You’re Obsessed with penis just like Joe...
Just because a weapon looks like a military weapon does not mean it is a military weapon... You cannot judge a book by its cover

Trophy hunting is invaluable to game populations, First of all it only excepts the best genetics. It culls out the worst genetics, it allows the best animals to pass their Genetics to the herd for the longest possible time.
If you had any common sense, You would realize trophy hunting only allows for the best genetics. That’s what it’s all about.
As an example, A mule deer is in its prime Between the ages of 2 1/2 to 6 years old. As a trophy Hunter you want to wait till it hits its peak before you harvest the animal. That way it passes It’s genetics to the most does possible.
Once the mule deer goes past its peak that is where the bad genetics will hurt the game population.

And no one’s going to spend any money to harvest substandard mule deer...

Trophy hunting is all about improving the game species for future harvesting… He can’t get any more simple than that. Lol

obviously you dont know shit about trophy hunting,,,they always take the biggest and healthiest,,,thats why its called a trophy and not food,,heck even some of the pricks dont even keep the meat and give it away,,,

they never take the unhealthy or runts,,,

like I said real people that hunt for food do the same thing

you never said,,what military are you talking about??? cause its all a matter of money and resources that determine what weapon you carry,,,sure an M-5 is better than a AR,,and some are better than an M-5,,,

but I would rather have an AR than a 22 or bolt action,,,

guns were created for the purpose of killing or war, what you decide to do with them other than that is your business

lol
You need to educate yourself, The best animals will be able to spread their genes to the most Females With trophy hunting. Then before they decline they are harvesting.

As an example, The mule deer that I harvested last year on public land. I watched him for three seasons. He passed his genes along to who knows how many does in those three years before his decline.
Without trophy hunting some joker would’ve shot him when he was two years old most likely.
M-5?
You do realize ARs are available in most every cartridge? Get a grip man you don’t know what you’re talking about. Lol

m5 I think is what the military carries,,I dont know for sure but it doesnt matter,,,
whats the cartridge got to do with it???

what did I say thats not correct???

almost every major advancement in gun tech throughout history was because of military use,,,ie killing,,,

You mean m-4 Carbine?
You really didn’t ask that did you? what does it matter what cartridge?
ARs don’t shoot a specific cartridge/caliber... lol

If you would do some research you would realize that Ars and the like are no different than any other sporting rifle. Available in a multitude of cartridges/calibers and one pull of the trigger = one shot

I never said they did,,,what I said is this qualifier of saying its a sporting rifle,,,assault rifle,,, is anti 2nd A bullshit and has led to more gun laws,,,

weapons of war is relative to the war and whos fighting it,,,and any gun will do even an AR if thats all you got,,,I prefer a mini 14 myself

the 2nd under its original intent was for any weapon thats why it said arms and not guns,,,