Poll to condemn or condone "the violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"

[TemplarKormac]

Unaffiliated and I don't support the violence. The peaceful protest was fine.

Though, I'm beginning to think the violence was staged.

 

[HappyJoy]

Armed means with guns

So, prevent I'm coming at you with a baseball bat.

Am I unarmed?

View attachment 503691

Unarmed people according to kyzr.

The 1/6 protesters were unarmed, i.e. no guns.
Ashli Babbitt was unarmed when she was shot in the neck by a black guy wearing a mask.

They were armed. Bear spray, flag poles, knives and other hand held weapons. They also took tasers from the police and used them.

Stop lying.

Compare those "weapons" to guns. You are lying saying that they were armed.
As soon as the SWAT teams showed up with ARs the party was over. No contest. No insurrection.

What did I lie about?

Sure, the insurrectionists had only been ripping up and shitting (literally) in the Capital for hours and yeah, their courage came in crowd form and when finally challenged by a deadly force they left.

Why are you defending them?

I'm not defending the rioters. I'm defending the insurrection charge.
It was NOT an insurrection, which by definition requires the insurrectionists to be armed.
The lie I'm saying you made is saying that the rioters were "armed".
They did not all have guns. as would be needed to have a real insurrection.
They trespassed, they damaged US property, they got arrested, they were NOT charged with insurrection, QED.

History will record it as a failed insurrection. You must be able to see that writing on the wall.

What I saw were rioters, no one was charged with "insurrection".
So the dems continual whining about an insurrection are bullshit.

Yes...I understand that is how you feel. I'm stating facts. This will be recorded in history as a failed insurrection.

Maybe the Marxists who write and publish books will re-write history, but since not one of the rioters was charged with "insurrection" that is PROOF that it was NOT an insurrection. The "insurrection" is just a lie, just a democrat talking point. It's not a "feel" its a fact, no charges of insurrection, QED. Maybe we can charge the FBI with fomenting an "insurrection"?

Sure, you can get all ridiculous about it but I’m still just stating a fact.

kyzr has practically created his own dictionary to rewrite the definition of the words he uses in his own posts.

Kyzr always copies definitions right from the "google definition". What word(s) are you whining about?
However, you do know that most words have multiple definitions/meanings.

What's the definition of insurrection or armed?

 

[Seawytch]

Unaffiliated and I don't support the violence. The peaceful protest was fine.

Though, I'm beginning to think the violence was staged.

Because Tucker Carlson said so? Fucking dupes…

 

[bripat9643]

Armed means with guns

So, prevent I'm coming at you with a baseball bat.

Am I unarmed?

View attachment 503691

Unarmed people according to kyzr.

The 1/6 protesters were unarmed, i.e. no guns.
Ashli Babbitt was unarmed when she was shot in the neck by a black guy wearing a mask.

They were armed. Bear spray, flag poles, knives and other hand held weapons. They also took tasers from the police and used them.

Stop lying.

Compare those "weapons" to guns. You are lying saying that they were armed.
As soon as the SWAT teams showed up with ARs the party was over. No contest. No insurrection.

What did I lie about?

Sure, the insurrectionists had only been ripping up and shitting (literally) in the Capital for hours and yeah, their courage came in crowd form and when finally challenged by a deadly force they left.

Why are you defending them?

I'm not defending the rioters. I'm defending the insurrection charge.
It was NOT an insurrection, which by definition requires the insurrectionists to be armed.
The lie I'm saying you made is saying that the rioters were "armed".
They did not all have guns. as would be needed to have a real insurrection.
They trespassed, they damaged US property, they got arrested, they were NOT charged with insurrection, QED.

History will record it as a failed insurrection. You must be able to see that writing on the wall.

What I saw were rioters, no one was charged with "insurrection".
So the dems continual whining about an insurrection are bullshit.

Yes...I understand that is how you feel. I'm stating facts. This will be recorded in history as a failed insurrection.

Maybe the Marxists who write and publish books will re-write history, but since not one of the rioters was charged with "insurrection" that is PROOF that it was NOT an insurrection. The "insurrection" is just a lie, just a democrat talking point. It's not a "feel" its a fact, no charges of insurrection, QED. Maybe we can charge the FBI with fomenting an "insurrection"?

Sure, you can get all ridiculous about it but I’m still just stating a fact.

The fact is that no one was charged with "insurrection".

Again, that is not going to change how this incident is written in the history books. It will be written as a failed insurrection. There is nothing you can say or do about it.

No it won't, turd. It will go down as a swindle.

And I’m sure that is a deeply held believe in your heart. It’s also very wrong.

NOT.

Wanna bet?

Sure.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Unaffiliated and I don't support the violence. The peaceful protest was fine.

Though, I'm beginning to think the violence was staged.

Because Tucker Carlson said so? Fucking dupes…

Because unlike you, I listen to and research what I hear.

The height of intellectual dishonesty is to discredit someone because you don't like them.

I doubt you even listened to what he said.

 

[Seawytch]

Unaffiliated and I don't support the violence. The peaceful protest was fine.

Though, I'm beginning to think the violence was staged.

Because Tucker Carlson said so? Fucking dupes…

Because unlike you, I listen to and research what I hear.

The height of intellectual dishonesty is to discredit someone because you don't like them.

I doubt you even listened to what he said.

You didn’t research jack shit. Don’t lie. Do you listened to Tucker’s bullshit and bought it.

Seriously? A false flag operation? You’ve all gone around the bend jumping off a shark.

 

[jc456]

Each state has it's own laws that prescribes audits. A partisan audit being conducted over a halve a year after the election to appease el'Trumpia is lot like

Perhaps if the judiciary did its job we wouldn’t be here. Can’t illegally remove ballots asshole

 

[Crepitus]

Armed means with guns

So, prevent I'm coming at you with a baseball bat.

Am I unarmed?

View attachment 503691

Unarmed people according to kyzr.

The 1/6 protesters were unarmed, i.e. no guns.
Ashli Babbitt was unarmed when she was shot in the neck by a black guy wearing a mask.

They were armed. Bear spray, flag poles, knives and other hand held weapons. They also took tasers from the police and used them.

Stop lying.

Compare those "weapons" to guns. You are lying saying that they were armed.
As soon as the SWAT teams showed up with ARs the party was over. No contest. No insurrection.

What did I lie about?

Sure, the insurrectionists had only been ripping up and shitting (literally) in the Capital for hours and yeah, their courage came in crowd form and when finally challenged by a deadly force they left.

Why are you defending them?

I'm not defending the rioters. I'm defending the insurrection charge.
It was NOT an insurrection, which by definition requires the insurrectionists to be armed.
The lie I'm saying you made is saying that the rioters were "armed".
They did not all have guns. as would be needed to have a real insurrection.
They trespassed, they damaged US property, they got arrested, they were NOT charged with insurrection, QED.

History will record it as a failed insurrection. You must be able to see that writing on the wall.

What I saw were rioters, no one was charged with "insurrection".
So the dems continual whining about an insurrection are bullshit.

Yes...I understand that is how you feel. I'm stating facts. This will be recorded in history as a failed insurrection.

Maybe the Marxists who write and publish books will re-write history, but since not one of the rioters was charged with "insurrection" that is PROOF that it was NOT an insurrection. The "insurrection" is just a lie, just a democrat talking point. It's not a "feel" its a fact, no charges of insurrection, QED. Maybe we can charge the FBI with fomenting an "insurrection"?

Sure, you can get all ridiculous about it but I’m still just stating a fact.

The fact is that no one was charged with "insurrection".

Again, that is not going to change how this incident is written in the history books. It will be written as a failed insurrection. There is nothing you can say or do about it.

And more and more is coming out that this was a heavily INCEL insurrection.

Incoherent babble

So... You're taking shortcuts and just posting "incoherent babble" rather that having to actually think up any?

 

[Crepitus]

Armed means with guns

So, prevent I'm coming at you with a baseball bat.

Am I unarmed?

View attachment 503691

Unarmed people according to kyzr.

The 1/6 protesters were unarmed, i.e. no guns.
Ashli Babbitt was unarmed when she was shot in the neck by a black guy wearing a mask.

They were armed. Bear spray, flag poles, knives and other hand held weapons. They also took tasers from the police and used them.

Stop lying.

Compare those "weapons" to guns. You are lying saying that they were armed.
As soon as the SWAT teams showed up with ARs the party was over. No contest. No insurrection.

What did I lie about?

Sure, the insurrectionists had only been ripping up and shitting (literally) in the Capital for hours and yeah, their courage came in crowd form and when finally challenged by a deadly force they left.

Why are you defending them?

I'm not defending the rioters. I'm defending the insurrection charge.
It was NOT an insurrection, which by definition requires the insurrectionists to be armed.
The lie I'm saying you made is saying that the rioters were "armed".
They did not all have guns. as would be needed to have a real insurrection.
They trespassed, they damaged US property, they got arrested, they were NOT charged with insurrection, QED.

History will record it as a failed insurrection. You must be able to see that writing on the wall.

What I saw were rioters, no one was charged with "insurrection".
So the dems continual whining about an insurrection are bullshit.

Yes...I understand that is how you feel. I'm stating facts. This will be recorded in history as a failed insurrection.

Maybe the Marxists who write and publish books will re-write history, but since not one of the rioters was charged with "insurrection" that is PROOF that it was NOT an insurrection. The "insurrection" is just a lie, just a democrat talking point. It's not a "feel" its a fact, no charges of insurrection, QED. Maybe we can charge the FBI with fomenting an "insurrection"?

Sure, you can get all ridiculous about it but I’m still just stating a fact.

The fact is that no one was charged with "insurrection".

Again, that is not going to change how this incident is written in the history books. It will be written as a failed insurrection. There is nothing you can say or do about it.

And more and more is coming out that this was a heavily INCEL insurrection.

You mean the prog morons keep making up more stuff?

Aww. You had such a good thing going with the shortcut.

 

[bodecea]

Unaffiliated and I don't support the violence. The peaceful protest was fine.

Though, I'm beginning to think the violence was staged.

Because Tucker Carlson said so? Fucking dupes…

Because unlike you, I listen to and research what I hear.

The height of intellectual dishonesty is to discredit someone because you don't like them.

I doubt you even listened to what he said.

Ok...so tell us. What in all your listening and research leads you to believe the violence was staged?

 

[WEATHER53]

Protests to see what might have gone awry

Might have! Might haves are not covered by the election laws in any state. Well at least so far they are not. Courts demand evidence, not hearsay, wild CS's, ultra violet light, creases, panda poop......whatever!

They didn't even look at the evidence, you fucking moron.

This guy had to be slipped away quick

 

[bodecea]

Unaffiliated and I don't support the violence. The peaceful protest was fine.

Though, I'm beginning to think the violence was staged.

Because Tucker Carlson said so? Fucking dupes…

Because unlike you, I listen to and research what I hear.

The height of intellectual dishonesty is to discredit someone because you don't like them.

I doubt you even listened to what he said.

Ok...so tell us. What in all your listening and research leads you to believe the violence was staged?

 

[TheGreenHornet]

"....murder of a unarmed White woman by an unnamed Black Capital Police Officer."

She was White.
He is Black.

And that matters to you why?

Obvious hate crime....yet even though blacks committ the most hate crimes of any race....few are ever charged with a hate crime and not even to mention the msm still maintains their fallacious narrative of black victimhood.

So why are you so 'sensitive' about mentioning the race of killers?

No problem can be solved until the problem is identified....the msm covers up to the best of their ability the true nature of inter-racial crimes(blacks are guilty of most of it) and then there is the fact that the DOJ maintains a double-standard in the prosecution of black criminals....as in far too many of them get probation.

That is why one of these black thugs running around on some street in our larger cities gets arrested for striking a Asian or Jew.....are often on probation and have a rap sheet as long as their arm...they should be in jail for past crimes but they are allowed to roam the streets and attack innocent people.

 

[BlindBoo]

Protests to see what might have gone awry

Might have! Might haves are not covered by the election laws in any state. Well at least so far they are not. Courts demand evidence, not hearsay, wild CS's, ultra violet light, creases, panda poop......whatever!

They didn't even look at the evidence, you fucking moron.

Contrary to known reality. In every case where the Trumpybear lawyers presented evidence, the judges ruled on it.

 

[BlindBoo]

Each state has it's own laws that prescribes audits. A partisan audit being conducted over a halve a year after the election to appease el'Trumpia is lot like

Perhaps if the judiciary did its job we wouldn’t be here. Can’t illegally remove ballots asshole

Each state did their job. The election is over sourpuss.

 

[John T. Ford]

Contrary to known reality. In every case where the Trumpybear lawyers presented evidence, the judges ruled on it.

Fuckin' LYING ASS Moron ....

 

[BlindBoo]

Contrary to known reality. In every case where the Trumpybear lawyers presented evidence, the judges ruled on it.

Fuckin' LYING ASS Moron ....

 

[John T. Ford]

See comment # 400 BE-Atch .....

 

[BlindBoo]

See comment # 400 BE-Atch .....

 

[bripat9643]

Protests to see what might have gone awry

Might have! Might haves are not covered by the election laws in any state. Well at least so far they are not. Courts demand evidence, not hearsay, wild CS's, ultra violet light, creases, panda poop......whatever!

They didn't even look at the evidence, you fucking moron.

Contrary to known reality. In every case where the Trumpybear lawyers presented evidence, the judges ruled on it.

They didn't look at it, moron.