Poll: Overwhelming majority support replacing RBG before the election.

[busybee01]

Suck on that, Dimwingers. Not just Republicans, but a majority of Dimwingers and Independents support replacing Ginsberg now.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation's highest bench.


Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020's race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.

Ginsburg’s death in the middle of 2020's election drew comparisons to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the 79-year-old conservative icon, Ronald Reagan appointee, and longtime Ginsburg friend, who died in February 2016 during the Democratic and Republican primaries. President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, to fill Scalia’s vacancy that March. But Senate Republicans declined to hold confirmation hearings or a vote, arguing that they wouldn’t confirm a justice appointed by a lame-duck president of the opposite party and that the winner in the 2016 election should fill the vacancy.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation’s highest bench. Marquette University released the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

That is untrue. There are several polls that contradict that.

 

[busybee01]

The Democrat response should be fight fire with fire.

If a blatant power grab 6 weeks from the election is the Trumpian game, let President Biden appoint three more justices.

The constitution doesn’t say anything about how many justices may sit on the SCOTUS.

Hey, retard, the Republican party would absolutely love you guys to attempt something that stupid

There is northing stupid about it. Rep8ublicans want to cheat then Democrats should do the same thing.

 

[Jackson]

Suck on that, Dimwingers. Not just Republicans, but a majority of Dimwingers and Independents support replacing Ginsberg now.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation's highest bench.


Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020's race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.

Ginsburg’s death in the middle of 2020's election drew comparisons to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the 79-year-old conservative icon, Ronald Reagan appointee, and longtime Ginsburg friend, who died in February 2016 during the Democratic and Republican primaries. President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, to fill Scalia’s vacancy that March. But Senate Republicans declined to hold confirmation hearings or a vote, arguing that they wouldn’t confirm a justice appointed by a lame-duck president of the opposite party and that the winner in the 2016 election should fill the vacancy.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation’s highest bench. Marquette University released the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

That is untrue. There are several polls that contradict that.

Can you provide a link or two, or three?

 

[Nostra]

Suck on that, Dimwingers. Not just Republicans, but a majority of Dimwingers and Independents support replacing Ginsberg now.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation's highest bench.


Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020's race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.

Ginsburg’s death in the middle of 2020's election drew comparisons to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the 79-year-old conservative icon, Ronald Reagan appointee, and longtime Ginsburg friend, who died in February 2016 during the Democratic and Republican primaries. President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, to fill Scalia’s vacancy that March. But Senate Republicans declined to hold confirmation hearings or a vote, arguing that they wouldn’t confirm a justice appointed by a lame-duck president of the opposite party and that the winner in the 2016 election should fill the vacancy.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation’s highest bench. Marquette University released the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

That is untrue. There are several polls that contradict that.

My poll is true.

I note you brought nothing but your usual bullshit

 

[busybee01]

Suck on that, Dimwingers. Not just Republicans, but a majority of Dimwingers and Independents support replacing Ginsberg now.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation's highest bench.


Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020's race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.

Ginsburg’s death in the middle of 2020's election drew comparisons to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the 79-year-old conservative icon, Ronald Reagan appointee, and longtime Ginsburg friend, who died in February 2016 during the Democratic and Republican primaries. President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, to fill Scalia’s vacancy that March. But Senate Republicans declined to hold confirmation hearings or a vote, arguing that they wouldn’t confirm a justice appointed by a lame-duck president of the opposite party and that the winner in the 2016 election should fill the vacancy.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation’s highest bench. Marquette University released the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

/——/ Well, how about that.

Majority of voters say Trump should not nominate a Supreme Court justice: poll

How about that.

 

[Nostra]

The Democrat response should be fight fire with fire.

If a blatant power grab 6 weeks from the election is the Trumpian game, let President Biden appoint three more justices.

The constitution doesn’t say anything about how many justices may sit on the SCOTUS.

Hey, retard, the Republican party would absolutely love you guys to attempt something that stupid

There is northing stupid about it. Rep8ublicans want to cheat then Democrats should do the same thing.

How is following the Constitution cheating, Simpleton?

 

[busybee01]

Suck on that, Dimwingers. Not just Republicans, but a majority of Dimwingers and Independents support replacing Ginsberg now.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation's highest bench.


Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020's race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.

Ginsburg’s death in the middle of 2020's election drew comparisons to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the 79-year-old conservative icon, Ronald Reagan appointee, and longtime Ginsburg friend, who died in February 2016 during the Democratic and Republican primaries. President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, to fill Scalia’s vacancy that March. But Senate Republicans declined to hold confirmation hearings or a vote, arguing that they wouldn’t confirm a justice appointed by a lame-duck president of the opposite party and that the winner in the 2016 election should fill the vacancy.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation’s highest bench. Marquette University released the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

That is untrue. There are several polls that contradict that.

Can you provide a link or two, or three?

Majority of voters say Trump should not nominate a Supreme Court justice: poll

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The Democrat response should be fight fire with fire.

If a blatant power grab 6 weeks from the election is the Trumpian game, let President Biden appoint three more justices.

The constitution doesn’t say anything about how many justices may sit on the SCOTUS.

Hey, retard, the Republican party would absolutely love you guys to attempt something that stupid

There is northing stupid about it. Rep8ublicans want to cheat then Democrats should do the same thing.

What cheating?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

If the nominee is Any Barteltt, they had better be careful. She's a mother of 7 (^women,) five of her own and two Haitian children she and her husband adopted (^immigrants). He resume is great and everyone is ready for the left to degrade a mother, family of 7 and show the true colors again.

The William Barr hearing should probably give us a taste of what it might be like. Someone should tell her to breathe easily, just wait for them to stop being asses and then ask "Do you want me to respond? You'll have to stop talking so I can."

They'll attack her she's too "religious", just as they did in her previous appointment.

She's a great candidate.

Bitch and moan all they want, if they held the cards they'd do the same thing.

 

[WelfareQueen]

In other words, don’t do what the Republicans did to Obama.

It was Obama's choice to wait until after the election. He didn't have a Democrat senate. He was going to push the failure on Hillary.

No. It wasn’t. It was McConnels decision not to even hold hearings. You agree with O Connell right?

"Elections have consequences"-Barry Hussein Obama.

Remember that. What goes around...comes around.

That's what your team is getting right now. How does it feel?

Depends...you guys were the ones who prevented Obama from filling court vacancies, at an unprecedented rate compared to prior presidents. You prevented Obama from filling a SCOTUS nomination he had every right to fill, and of course you will pretend that the situation is somehow different this time because that is how you justify it. But what you have done,
along with Democrats is broken established norms and bipartisanship in for the long term goal of stacking the courts, McConnell, unlike most here has been totally upfront about it. He hasn’t pretended it has been anything else or that that this is somehow a case of “what co es around goes around”...it isn’t. It is a long term well thought out strategy. So at least, be as honest as McConnellis and stop pretending it is payback. You guys have broken the system. I don’t support expanding tbe court (but term limits might be good)...but now, after seeing what the Republicans have done over court vacancies..I almost hope they do.

No. Harry Reid changed the rules first. But after the crap your team pulled with Kavanaugh all bets are off. You Dims play hardball. You can't stand it when the same is done to you.

And for the love of God, after three years of fake Russian Collusion, Impeachment, Kavanaugh and at least 50 other things Dims pretend to have the moral high ground?

What a complete joke. You lost. Deal with it.

 

[Nostra]

Suck on that, Dimwingers. Not just Republicans, but a majority of Dimwingers and Independents support replacing Ginsberg now.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation's highest bench.


Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020's race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.

Ginsburg’s death in the middle of 2020's election drew comparisons to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the 79-year-old conservative icon, Ronald Reagan appointee, and longtime Ginsburg friend, who died in February 2016 during the Democratic and Republican primaries. President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, to fill Scalia’s vacancy that March. But Senate Republicans declined to hold confirmation hearings or a vote, arguing that they wouldn’t confirm a justice appointed by a lame-duck president of the opposite party and that the winner in the 2016 election should fill the vacancy.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation’s highest bench. Marquette University released the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

/——/ Well, how about that.

Majority of voters say Trump should not nominate a Supreme Court justice: poll

How about that.

Online polls are useless.

 

[busybee01]

The Democrat response should be fight fire with fire.

If a blatant power grab 6 weeks from the election is the Trumpian game, let President Biden appoint three more justices.

The constitution doesn’t say anything about how many justices may sit on the SCOTUS.

Hey, retard, the Republican party would absolutely love you guys to attempt something that stupid

There is northing stupid about it. Rep8ublicans want to cheat then Democrats should do the same thing.

How is following the Constitution cheating, Simpleton?

The Constitution says nothing about how the vote is held. The Republicans established the rule in 2016 when they refused to even consider Obama's nomination of Graland.

 

[Nostra]

The Democrat response should be fight fire with fire.

If a blatant power grab 6 weeks from the election is the Trumpian game, let President Biden appoint three more justices.

The constitution doesn’t say anything about how many justices may sit on the SCOTUS.

Hey, retard, the Republican party would absolutely love you guys to attempt something that stupid

There is northing stupid about it. Rep8ublicans want to cheat then Democrats should do the same thing.

How is following the Constitution cheating, Simpleton?

The Constitution says nothing about how the vote is held. The Republicans established the rule in 2016 when they refused to even consider Obama's nomination of Graland.

Nothing was "established" in 2016, idiot.

What happened in 2016 has happened numerous times in the past. Go get educated.

 

[busybee01]

Suck on that, Dimwingers. Not just Republicans, but a majority of Dimwingers and Independents support replacing Ginsberg now.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation's highest bench.


Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020's race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.

Ginsburg’s death in the middle of 2020's election drew comparisons to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the 79-year-old conservative icon, Ronald Reagan appointee, and longtime Ginsburg friend, who died in February 2016 during the Democratic and Republican primaries. President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, to fill Scalia’s vacancy that March. But Senate Republicans declined to hold confirmation hearings or a vote, arguing that they wouldn’t confirm a justice appointed by a lame-duck president of the opposite party and that the winner in the 2016 election should fill the vacancy.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation’s highest bench. Marquette University released the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

/——/ Well, how about that.

Majority of voters say Trump should not nominate a Supreme Court justice: poll

How about that.

Online polls are useless.

Because you don't like what it says.

 

[Jackson]

Suck on that, Dimwingers. Not just Republicans, but a majority of Dimwingers and Independents support replacing Ginsberg now.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation's highest bench.


Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020's race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.

Ginsburg’s death in the middle of 2020's election drew comparisons to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the 79-year-old conservative icon, Ronald Reagan appointee, and longtime Ginsburg friend, who died in February 2016 during the Democratic and Republican primaries. President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, to fill Scalia’s vacancy that March. But Senate Republicans declined to hold confirmation hearings or a vote, arguing that they wouldn’t confirm a justice appointed by a lame-duck president of the opposite party and that the winner in the 2016 election should fill the vacancy.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation’s highest bench. Marquette University released the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

/——/ Well, how about that.

Majority of voters say Trump should not nominate a Supreme Court justice: poll

How about that.

That is untrue. There are several polls that contradict that

I'm waiting for the several polls.

 

[Nostra]

The Democrat response should be fight fire with fire.

If a blatant power grab 6 weeks from the election is the Trumpian game, let President Biden appoint three more justices.

The constitution doesn’t say anything about how many justices may sit on the SCOTUS.

Hey, retard, the Republican party would absolutely love you guys to attempt something that stupid

There is northing stupid about it. Rep8ublicans want to cheat then Democrats should do the same thing.

How is following the Constitution cheating, Simpleton?

The Constitution says nothing about how the vote is held. The Republicans established the rule in 2016 when they refused to even consider Obama's nomination of Graland.

The Constitution says nothing about how the vote is held.

Exactly. The Constitution leaves that up to the Senate. So tell us how holding a vote in the Senate is "cheating".

Watch him dodge this one.................

 

[busybee01]

The Democrat response should be fight fire with fire.

If a blatant power grab 6 weeks from the election is the Trumpian game, let President Biden appoint three more justices.

The constitution doesn’t say anything about how many justices may sit on the SCOTUS.

Hey, retard, the Republican party would absolutely love you guys to attempt something that stupid

There is northing stupid about it. Rep8ublicans want to cheat then Democrats should do the same thing.

How is following the Constitution cheating, Simpleton?

The Constitution says nothing about how the vote is held. The Republicans established the rule in 2016 when they refused to even consider Obama's nomination of Graland.

Nothing was "established" in 2016, idiot.

What happened in 2016 has happened numerous times in the past. Go get educated.

You need to get educated. It has not happened. It was blatant partisanship by Republicans. The Trump Republican Party must be destroyed in November.

 

[Nostra]

Suck on that, Dimwingers. Not just Republicans, but a majority of Dimwingers and Independents support replacing Ginsberg now.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation's highest bench.


Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020's race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.

Ginsburg’s death in the middle of 2020's election drew comparisons to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the 79-year-old conservative icon, Ronald Reagan appointee, and longtime Ginsburg friend, who died in February 2016 during the Democratic and Republican primaries. President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, to fill Scalia’s vacancy that March. But Senate Republicans declined to hold confirmation hearings or a vote, arguing that they wouldn’t confirm a justice appointed by a lame-duck president of the opposite party and that the winner in the 2016 election should fill the vacancy.

People favor confirmation hearings for Supreme Court vacancy in 2020: Poll

A new poll conducted shortly before the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg revealed that an overwhelming majority of U.S. adults of all political stripes supported holding hearings for a nominee if a vacancy opened on the nation’s highest bench. Marquette University released the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

/——/ Well, how about that.

Majority of voters say Trump should not nominate a Supreme Court justice: poll

How about that.

Online polls are useless.

Because you don't like what it says.

No, because they are worthless.

Even your moronic online poll showing 51% oppose has a huge margin of error that basically nullifies your claim, idiot.

 

[busybee01]

The Democrat response should be fight fire with fire.

If a blatant power grab 6 weeks from the election is the Trumpian game, let President Biden appoint three more justices.

The constitution doesn’t say anything about how many justices may sit on the SCOTUS.

Hey, retard, the Republican party would absolutely love you guys to attempt something that stupid

There is northing stupid about it. Rep8ublicans want to cheat then Democrats should do the same thing.

How is following the Constitution cheating, Simpleton?

The Constitution says nothing about how the vote is held. The Republicans established the rule in 2016 when they refused to even consider Obama's nomination of Graland.

The Constitution says nothing about how the vote is held.

Exactly. The Constitution leaves that up to the Senate. So tell us how holding a vote in the Senate is "cheating".

Watch him dodge this one.................

There should have been a vote on the Garland nimination.

 

[Nostra]

The Democrat response should be fight fire with fire.

If a blatant power grab 6 weeks from the election is the Trumpian game, let President Biden appoint three more justices.

The constitution doesn’t say anything about how many justices may sit on the SCOTUS.

Hey, retard, the Republican party would absolutely love you guys to attempt something that stupid

There is northing stupid about it. Rep8ublicans want to cheat then Democrats should do the same thing.

How is following the Constitution cheating, Simpleton?

The Constitution says nothing about how the vote is held. The Republicans established the rule in 2016 when they refused to even consider Obama's nomination of Graland.

Nothing was "established" in 2016, idiot.

What happened in 2016 has happened numerous times in the past. Go get educated.

You need to get educated. It has not happened. It was blatant partisanship by Republicans. The Trump Republican Party must be destroyed in November.

You are wrong again..........

Nomination and confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org