Didn't you know that almost all of America is populated by phony Christians and neofascists?Remember, whenever a magaturd says Real American, they mean them.
Nope. Didn't know that. Must be my commie/socialist/Marxist/purple haired/nose ring preventing me from seeing 'da troof'.Didn't you know that almost all of America is populated by phony Christians and neofascists?
You didn't know that? Really? I thought EVERYBODY knew that! Hell, Trump got almost half the vote!
Well, the free press is dead. I heard it here.Nope. Didn't know that. Must be my commie/socialist/Marxist/purple haired/nose ring preventing me from seeing 'da troof'.
Entitled rubes (magaturds) helped kill it.
RIP, press.
How does this (from your link), not comply with a court order:A Smoking Gun Document
A newly unsealed court filing has revealed previously unknown details about the Trump administration’s operation to remove Venezuelan nationals under the Alien Enemies Act and threatens to undermine key elements of its legal defense.
The filing is a declaration by ICE official Carlos D. Cisneros in an Alien Enemies Act case in federal court in the Southern District of Texas. The implications of what Cisneros has revealed could reverberate in AEA cases around the country, including at the Supreme Court.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/morni...key-parts-of-trumps-alien-enemies-act-defense
- Timing: The headline news was Cisneros’ revelation that detainees are being given “no less than 12 hours” to decide whether to contest their imminent removal under the AEA and another 24 hours to file a habeas case. This is supposed to satisfy the notice requirement the Supreme Court imposed earlier this month in AEA cases, but it is unlikely any court is going to find the 12/24-hour combo sufficient. By way of comparison, U.S. District Judge Charlotte Sweeney of Colorado earlier this week imposed a 21-day notice requirement and other procedural safeguards on the government in an Alien Enemies Act ruling.
Chris Geidner analyzes of how the Cisneros declaration reveals the regime is telling the SC one thing and apparently doing another.
ICE contradicts DOJ filing at SCOTUS that a pending habeas case blocks AEA removal
All of which begs the question........what's the strategy behind the open defiance of court orders? I'm beginning to wonder if trump wants protests to break down in to violent interactions with police so he can declare martial law.
After Flynn called for martial law, Trump wanted to put him in charge
After Flynn called for martial law, Trump wanted to put him in charge: NYTimes
Rachel Maddow shares reporting from the New York Times that even after disgraced former Trump NSA Michael Flynn called for using the U.S. military towww.msnbc.com
You brought up the death of free press, did you not? How does this magically become my 'lie'?Also, you stating a news program is on right now changes nothing.
Did my question trigger you, they/them?
Since nothing you say is of interest to me, I'm going to go with no.
At least we have that in common. Enjoy the next few years of the Trump dictatorship!
I enjoy shitting on it. It triggers magaturds.
After 4 years of ignoring the law, Dems suddenly want everyone to obey the law.
The fakest of fake newsI am heartened that the majority of Americans support the rule of law....even if they disagree
With many of the administration’s actions facing legal challenges in federal courts, there is widespread – largely bipartisan – sentiment that the administration would have to end an action if a federal court deemed it illegal.
- 78% say the Trump administration should have to follow a federal court’s ruling, rising to 88% if the Supreme Court were to issue the ruling.
- 91% of Democrats and 65% of Republicans say the administration would need to stop an action if a federal court ruled it illegal, rising to 95% of Democrats and 82% of Republicans for a Supreme Court ruling.
However, the latest national survey by Pew Research Center, conducted April 7-13 among 3,589 adults, finds much wider partisan differences in evaluations of Trump’s overall job performance and some key policies.
Seven-in-ten or more Republicans and Republican-leaning independents approve of:
- Trump’s job performance (75%)
- The administration’s cuts to government (78%)
- Increased tariffs (70%)
- Ending diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the federal government (78%)
By comparison, even wider majorities of Democrats and Democratic leaners disapprove of:
- Trump’s job performance (93%)
- The administration’s cuts to government (89%)
- Increased tariffs (90%)
- Ending DEI policies in the federal government (86%)
You are helping grow MAGA, good job Tubleweed
You trigger no one, skippy.
^^^ Says the guy who posts disagree emojis on most of my posts.
