Yes, that's what the direct measurements show.
But we do understand. The actual data always keeps contradicting denier cult religious beliefs, so they have to constantly invent these new creative ways to deny the data. That's why they're called deniers.
Yes, that's what the direct measurements show.
But we do understand. The actual data always keeps contradicting denier cult religious beliefs, so they have to constantly invent these new creative ways to deny the data. That's why they're called deniers.
if we do everything the warmers want us to do, then will it be time to control the sun ? that would take even more research, and i'm guessing longer for "consensus".
Yes, that's what the direct measurements show.
But we do understand. The actual data always keeps contradicting denier cult religious beliefs, so they have to constantly invent these new creative ways to deny the data. That's why they're called deniers.
that's why we need to get busy on this, and give the government more money, apparently the sun is going to give us more trouble too.
Yes, that's what the direct measurements show.
But we do understand. The actual data always keeps contradicting denier cult religious beliefs, so they have to constantly invent these new creative ways to deny the data. That's why they're called deniers.
Gasp! OMG!
That could be a real problem in three billion years or so.
what about cremations ? when they asked bob hope where he wanted to be burried he said surprise me. i'd like a viking burial.
that's why we need to get busy on this, and give the government more money, apparently the sun is going to give us more trouble too.
Yes, that's what the direct measurements show.
But we do understand. The actual data always keeps contradicting denier cult religious beliefs, so they have to constantly invent these new creative ways to deny the data. That's why they're called deniers.
Gasp! OMG!
That could be a real problem in three billion years or so.
what if we stop global warming completely, and the sun goes into an extreme cooling period, won't the global heat people look cold and foolish.
one the big problems with cap and trade, is that no one can tell the future. i'd rather spend my global warming dough on fixing that rotten bridge, better yet, fixing Chicago and other cities murders, and stop heroin from coming to Vermont, and other states.
Mamooth, I can't help but be reminded of the great Dust Storms that devastated us during great Depression. Farmers were told for several years about the dangers of ignoring the advice to contour plow and other conservation options, and their reasoning was similar to today's scorn of climate change. Same put downs, laughter and denials. This is a very human trait, I think. I suspect the writer of the story of Noah had this part of our human DNA in mind as he described scoffers too. BTW, I have also heard that the Oglala Aquifer that lies under the same area of prairie that was devastated by the dust storms has been overused again as it was then, and is down about 50%.
Of course not. Baseline-shifting fraud is exclusively the specialty of you and several of your denier masters. It's always used in the fudged graphs that deniers post when they claim the models have been wrong, and you commonly attempt to use it, as you just did.
Oh, speaking of the models, let's check out the actual model predictions as compared to reality.
The Likelihood of Recent Record Warmth : Scientific Reports
Pretty damn good. And all the scientists know it. That's why they know, with 100% certainty, that deniers are peddling yet another of their frauds when they claim the models were bad.
(And yes, deniers will respond by screaming all the data is faked. It's what conspiracy cultists do.)
Of course not. Baseline-shifting fraud is exclusively the specialty of you and several of your denier masters. It's always used in the fudged graphs that deniers post when they claim the models have been wrong, and you commonly attempt to use it, as you just did.
Oh, speaking of the models, let's check out the actual model predictions as compared to reality.
The Likelihood of Recent Record Warmth : Scientific Reports
Pretty damn good. And all the scientists know it. That's why they know, with 100% certainty, that deniers are peddling yet another of their frauds when they claim the models were bad.
(And yes, deniers will respond by screaming all the data is faked. It's what conspiracy cultists do.)
Of course not. Baseline-shifting fraud is exclusively the specialty of you and several of your denier masters. It's always used in the fudged graphs that deniers post when they claim the models have been wrong, and you commonly attempt to use it, as you just did.
Oh, speaking of the models, let's check out the actual model predictions as compared to reality.
The Likelihood of Recent Record Warmth : Scientific Reports
Pretty damn good. And all the scientists know it. That's why they know, with 100% certainty, that deniers are peddling yet another of their frauds when they claim the models were bad.
(And yes, deniers will respond by screaming all the data is faked. It's what conspiracy cultists do.)
