Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think Rand Paul is a whiny little pussy who needs to concern himself more with the lack of vaccinated people in Kentucky than constantly harping gain of function nonsense
Their testy exchange, where each accused the other of lying is here.
It would be helpful to watch the whole thing in order to cast an informed vote.
Basically, Rand Paul uses Fauci's own testimony, a paper from one of the Wuhan virologists stating that the research was being funded by NIH, and the NIH's own definition of "gain of function" to make the case that Fauci lied.
Fauci defended himself by saying that Dr. Paul does not know what he is talking about and he is the one who is lying (effectively, "nuh-uh").
Your vote will be publicly viewable, and you cannot change your vote.
Sure looks that wayDo You Agree With Dr. Rand Paul That Dr. Anthony Fauci Lied to Congress Regarding NIH Funding Gain of Function Research in Wuhan?
Translation - "I have no idea what they were talking about, but I'm a partisan Democrat, so Fauci won."This was awesome. By my count,
Fauci 4
Paul 0
That is such bullshit. Everyone knows when there is no real evidence it's always a sign that it's Hillary who was behind it. She's the only one who has the power to disappear all the 'evidence' against her (Oh, and people, don;t forget that)!No one wants to face the fact that this is Obama's pandemic. He grew it here, sent it to China to be honed and let go. He gave the lab 3.7 million tax payer dollars for the effort. They are well funded and busy at work as we speak...
Translation - "I have no idea what they were talking about, but I'm a partisan Democrat, so Fauci won."
Their testy exchange, where each accused the other of lying is here.
It would be helpful to watch the whole thing in order to cast an informed vote.
Basically, Rand Paul uses Fauci's own testimony, a paper from one of the Wuhan virologists stating that the research was being funded by NIH, and the NIH's own definition of "gain of function" to make the case that Fauci lied.
Fauci defended himself by saying that Dr. Paul does not know what he is talking about and he is the one who is lying (effectively, "nuh-uh").
Your vote will be publicly viewable, and you cannot change your vote.
It's the euphemism for biological warfare.“Gain-of-function” is the euphemism for biological research aimed at increasing the virulence and lethality of pathogens and viruses. GoF research is government funded; its focus is on enhancing the pathogens’ ability to infect different species and to increase their deadly impact as airborne pathogens and viruses.
Let’s start with Sen Paul holding Dr Fauci responsible for 4 million deathsThanks, but that does not answer my question about what conspiracy theory you are referring to.
Fauci said "nuh-uh," but he never explained why the research in question was not gain of function.
It's not like Rand Paul accused Fauci of deliberately funding this research in order to get Trump out of office in exchange for becoming a very rich man and the highest paid US government working in America. That would be a conspiracy.![]()
No, I think Fauci's just sick and tired of being dragged before the court of Senate Republican Opinion and being asked the same questions with same assertions by the hayseed from KY.Anthony Fauci's anger, when met with the opportunity to demonstrate accountability for his malfeasant actions, certainly did reflect a generous amount of insecurity. He lost it. Observably. He clearly wasn't prepared for the likes of Rand Paul. He's so used to the talking heads in cable news entertainment slobbering all over his celebrity that he seems to have forgotten when he's speaking at the big kids table.
People like Anthony Fauci are why the Nuremberg Code exists and he should be put into a cage for lying to congress. That's not even touching on legitimate questions with regard to crimes against humanity ,an extremely serious charge. .
He clearly has no sense of self-awareness whatsoever, the exchange patently demonstrated that, and he certainly holds no regard for personal responsibility/accountability. Observably.
Grouchy Fauci is grouchy...
![]()
My granny, bless her soul, always said them chickins is comin home to roost.
Sen Paul uses the same playbook every timeThis was awesome. By my count,
Fauci 4
Paul 0
You would think that Paul would get tired of getting his ass beat but ever since his neighbor laid one on him, I've thinking he kinda likes it![]()
The paper trail leads back to Fauxi, dipschitt.Sen Paul uses the same playbook every time
Make wild accusations and keep repeating……Gain of Function, Gain of Function, Gain of Function
Then, as Dr Fauci tries to correct him, Paul keeps interrupting
Their testy exchange, where each accused the other of lying is here.
It would be helpful to watch the whole thing in order to cast an informed vote.
Basically, Rand Paul uses Fauci's own testimony, a paper from one of the Wuhan virologists stating that the research was being funded by NIH, and the NIH's own definition of "gain of function" to make the case that Fauci lied.
Fauci defended himself by saying that Dr. Paul does not know what he is talking about and he is the one who is lying (effectively, "nuh-uh").
Your vote will be publicly viewable, and you cannot change your vote.
No, I think Fauci's just sick and tired of being dragged before the court of Senate Republican Opinion and being asked the same questions with same assertions by the hayseed from KY.
So far, Paul is 0 for 4 in his attempt to manufacture..erm...produce any tangible evidence to back his BS up. Once OK. Twice. Maybe. Three times? You're just trying for a "gotcha".
Four times???
Evidently, it doesn’t.The paper trail leads back to Fauxi, dipschitt.
And as you've been told more times than I care to remember, Fauci changed his position because of what was learned from how the virus spreads.Fauci's word don't mean shit to me after he first told the nation on TV that masks were a waste of time, then retracted that to say something totally different later.
It's beyond evident that it does....But you're immune from facts that intrude into your cult of Saint Tony.Evidently, it doesn’t.
Sen Paul does not know what he is talking about