I don't understand why the US doesn't follow Germany's conservative approach, it's certainly working there. Cut spending and raising taxes has jettisoned Germany's recovery, while the US's spins it's wheels going nowhere. It's been a pain for the German people in the short term but the long term result is proving rewarding.
Because the US has elected the socialists into power and Germany elected conservatives.
We can be compared to France and their idiocy of 75% tax on a million euro ( ruled unconstitutional, btw), not to Germany.
Germany actually proves that CONSERVATISM works, we prove - that LEFTISM does not.
You do know conservatives in Germany are much more moderate than their American counterparts and much more socialistic too.
Germany is more socialist than the US. It's not even close. Germany spends 28.8% of their GDP on social programs, the US spends 23.4% of it's GDP on social programs.
Net Social Expenditure % of gdp statistics - Countries compared - NationMaster
Hi Kiwiman: i was amazed that the leaders in Congress managed to trim down the demands to just those two conditions: a. to delay the individual mandates for one year and b. to cut the tax on medical equipment that would have hurt businesses and services trying to provide medically related services
I did not realize what a big concession this was
until I ran into opponents against ACA who wouldn't even go along with the year delay
to fix problems with the bill, but want the whole thing scrapped as unconstitutional
So that compromise WAS a HUGE push to meet in the middle
after already conceding that Judge Roberts passed this as a "tax" when it wasn't set up
and passed through Congress as a tax
This makes me very moderate and inclusive to accept both the
support and opposition to ACA as EQUALLY protected by law
as long as people are free to support the options of their choice
And as this constitutionalist moderate
I still oppose pushing the ACA as imposing such a restrictive mandate
that adds penalties and fines to taxpayers while taking away choices
instead of rewarding taxpayers for investing in better solutions
I think the fear of conservatives blocked the ability to accept
what was already a good offer to buy time to amend the problematic bill
I found more liberal friends who also thought the offer was reasonable
but have not found one person who really wants to fund the mandates
or be held to them. not one. sorry!
most people want other choices and/or believe
what we're already paying should be enough without adding more cost to taxpayers