BluesLegend
Diamond Member
When the left get caught lying and they can't spin it, they just move on to pushing the next lie.Too bad Politifact will learn nothing from this experience, and go on to keep lying on behalf of the DemoKKKrats.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When the left get caught lying and they can't spin it, they just move on to pushing the next lie.Too bad Politifact will learn nothing from this experience, and go on to keep lying on behalf of the DemoKKKrats.
It always has had a biased politically motivated agenda. It’s own “fact” checking must be checking with the orthodox progressive big book of permitted speech and tolerated beliefs.PolitiFact is fake nooz.
No, I am not....you claimed the law was poorly worded. I am asking you why you think that? What was so hard to understand for you about the law?I never argued that a judge shouldn't rule on the actual wording. A judge has to rule on the law as written, poorly or not. You all make this assumption I am condemning the judge. I am not. I am condemning the illiterate law makers.
No, I am not....you claimed the law was poorly worded. I am asking you why you think that? What was so hard to understand for you about the law?
I never argued that a judge shouldn't rule on the actual wording. A judge has to rule on the law as written, poorly or not. You all make this assumption I am condemning the judge. I am not. I am condemning the illiterate law makers.
What was wrong with the law in your opinion, counselor?
and i read it and quoted right from itI posted the link to your question that shouldn't even need to be asked.
you posted a link to opinions not proof,, other experts claim its worded just fine and means what it was intended to mean,,I posted the link to your question that shouldn't even need to be asked.
and i read it and quoted right from it
but it still doesn’t answer my question…what about the law did you find to be poorly written and what did you not understand???
you posted a link to opinions not proof,, other experts claim its worded just fine and means what it was intended to mean,,
you posted opinions,, other opinions say different,,I posted something to back up what I said.....you not so much.
then why did you make the claim that it was dismissed for that reason?I have no obligation to understand it. I posted what experts said.
It was poorly worded. That's been covered.
you posted opinions,, other opinions say different,,
it would help if you explained how its worded wrong,,
then why did you make the claim that it was dismissed for that reason?
your link, as i quoted, has someone saying the ruling was perfectly reasonable given the language of the stat. Really didn’t support your assertion.
so are you now saying you understood the law?
How so? All you did was post someone's opinion (probably your own).
What's legally wrong with the wording of the law?
so youre limited to what other people tell you to think,,I posted a link......you not so much.
so youre limited to what other people tell you to think,,
I think thats called a useful idiot,,
you didnt back it up,, you posted someone elses opinion,,I told you what I thought. I was then asked to back that up and I did. You not so much.
you said he ruled that way because the law was poorly written .Criminy. I said the ruling was a legit ruling........it's like discussing things with a brick wall.