Politico Breaking: Jack Smith Lays Out His Case Against Trump In Vivid Detail.

[Frankenstein]

I do? They're telling me to vote third party/write in?

You're so proud of your ignorance. In other words, a typical Trumpster.

Boring.

Your vote for third party is a vote for the democrat nominee! My ignorance?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I’m pointing out that you have no argument.

The prosecutors have the argument.

And the indictments.

You have a bunch of mouth frothing and drywall punching.

Note the difference.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Doesn’t matter how long it was delayed, it hasn’t been proven in court, until then, it’s just accusations

Not in the court of public opinion.

Trump's guilt has been well chronicled by the Jan 6 hearings and the publicly released info from the criminal cases.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That statement was to Jared and Ivanka.

And his family pleaded with Trump, as far as I know.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Wow, talk about a politically motivated judge in swaying/tampering/interfering with an election!!

Oh, look who suddenly wants to protect the norms.

A Trump shill.

This is my surprised face

 

[Frankenstein]

The prosecutors have the argument.

And the indictments.

You have a bunch of mouth frothing and drywall punching.

Note the difference.

it is simply the same argument, dressed up differently, closer to the election, and election interference, he has no standing as he was not approved by congress sit down shut up and take what is coming to you

Jack Smith Isn’t a Special Counsel ‘by Law’​

Federal prosecutors must be duly appointed and confirmed by the Senate. He fails both tests.​

 

[IM2]

No.
None of these cases would have gone forward if Trump had gone away after 2020. All of this has been political, and it gives us a front row seat to Stalinistic tactics.

Incorrect.

 

[IM2]

it is simply the same argument, dressed up differently, closer to the election, and election interference, he has no standing as he was not approved by congress sit down shut up and take what is coming to you

Jack Smith Isn’t a Special Counsel ‘by Law’​

Federal prosecutors must be duly appointed and confirmed by the Senate. He fails both tests.​

BS.

 

[IM2]

Jack Smith should crawl back under the bridge he came from.
The bum looks like a meth-head, and he has no standing as an unappointed prosecutor.

Your boy Trump broke the law. Deal with this reality.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I really doubt this is going to move the needle. The fact is, Donald Trump is essentially an island. He's not held to any standards whatsoever. Especially by those who claim to carthis e about morality or the law or the Constitution.

The law may try to go after him, and that's one thing. But half the public either won't hear about this, won't bother to absorb it, or won't care.

I couldn't tell you why, but that's a fact.

Thinking people recognize this as a hysterical hit piece of election interference.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Just a reminder for those that need it.

#1 Thank Chief Justice Roberts
The SCOTUS held off issuing the decision until July 1st instead of issuing it's decision months before. As a result the SCOTUS directed Judge Chutkan to hold an evidentiary hearing to examine the evidence in support of the Superseding Indictment to evaluate it in accordance with the three categories the SCOTUS defined.
A. Official Duties - Full Immunity
B. Peripheral Duties - Where there will be some immunity but it can be overcome for criminal actions outside of scope
C. Unofficial Actions - No Immunity.

There is, IIRC, an 89 day delay from when the SCOTUS issues a decision for it to be remanded back to the trial court. That means the trial court couldn't take ANY action as a result of the July 1st SCOTUS decision until the remand period ended at the end of SEP.

So you wonder why Judge Chutkan is taking action now? It's because of the timing the SCOTUS laid out.

#2 EVIDENCE
Remember the evidence that supports the motion for determination on immunity is based on Grand Jury testimony, witness statements, emails, texts, phone records, etc.

Where did this evidence come from? Trump own actions, Trump staff, and Trump supporters. In other words the evidence that is being presented against Trump comes from Republicans.

WW

 

[IM2]

You’re right, only the accusations, but it sure seems like they want to thrust an untried case out into the public so public opinion will be swayed.

Trump has been running his mouth about these things for a long time trying to sway the public. So the facts should be shown to the public as well.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

There are plenty of other US Code crimes that fall under treasonistic acts, that don't deserve the death penalty. Treason is usually never charged, but the sub crimes under it are....

There's only one law that applies: 18 USC 2383

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Wrong, of course. They were long underway before Trump declared his candidacy early in an effort to interfere with them.

The fact that he was a president is the reason they took too long.

So, wrong on every level.

Had Trump went away after 2020, nothing would be going on right now.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Trump will end up being the next Nelson Mandela.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Had Trump went away after 2020, nothing would be going on right now.

No. The investigations started before his candidacy.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump will end up being the next Nelson Mandela.

Mandela will be remembered in history as changing the world for the better.

Trump will go down as a rapist charity thief insurrectionist.

 

[Vrenn]

Joe McCarthy wasn't wrong.....

Will you at least admit you are a member of the John Birch Society? And if you aren't, you should be.

 

[Vrenn]

Try looking up the Venona documents.......

Okay, the KGB did have some sleepers wake up in 1939. But what does that have to do with today considering Putin backs tRump. Sounds like a conflict of interest on your part.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Will you at least admit you are a member of the John Birch Society? And if you aren't, you should be.

Yuri Bezmenov warned us about YOU.